Jump to content
IGNORED

Trump - hoće li biti impeachment ili 8 godina drugačijeg predsednikovanja?


radisa

Recommended Posts

foreign policy

Is America a Failing State?

Our country is at a crossroads, and the right path forward must not include Donald Trump as president.
BY DAVID ROTHKOPFMAY 10, 2017facebooktwittergoogle-plusredditLinkedIn email
Is America a Failing State? 
We have the tin-pot leader whose vanity knows no bounds. We have the rapacious family feathering their nests without regard for the law or common decency. We have utter disregard for values at home and abroad, the disdain for democracy, the hunger for constraining a free press, the admiration for thugs and strongmen worldwide.
 
We have all the makings of a banana republic. But worse, we are showing the telltale signs of a failing state. Our government has ceased to function. Party politics and gross self-interest has rendered the majority party oblivious to its responsibilities to its constituents and the Constitution of the United States. On a daily basis, Republicans watch their leader violate not only the traditions and standards of the high office he occupies, but through inaction they enable him to personally profit from the presidency, promote policies that benefit his cronies and his class to the detriment of the majority of the American people, and serially attack the principles on which the country was founded — from freedom of religion to the separation of powers.

 
Recent events have taken this grim situation and turned it dire. We now know that Donald Trump chose a man as his top national security advisor whom the prior president had both fired and warned him against hiring. We know that Trump’s White House failed to vet this man who would be entrusted with some of America’s most sensitive secrets and decisions. We know they did not get him the security clearances his position required, yet allowed him to operate freely in that position. We know that this man, Gen. Michael Flynn, took significant cash payments from an enemy, Russia, and from a nominal ally with which we have precarious relations, Turkey. We know Flynn failed to disclose those payments in violation of the law.
 
Indeed, we know that the only thing likely to keep Flynn from serving time for felonies is if he strikes a bargain with the prosecutors who are now investigating his behavior. As a consequence of revelations associated with those investigations, we know that Flynn, had on-going contact with Russians officials during the campaign and, after he was named national security advisor, had conversations with the Russian ambassador about which he lied to the American people and, ostensibly, to the vice president of the United States. We know these conversations were likely illegal as well.
 
We do not know when the president became aware of Flynn’s Russia ties or whether he approved or disapproved of them. We do know that other members of his campaign team — including his campaign chairman and a named foreign policy advisor — also had ties to Moscow that were close enough that they were compelled to resign during the campaign. We also believe they may be at the center of a federal investigation that began during last year’s campaign into the nature of the relationships between the Trump campaign and a Russian government that was actively trying to undermine U.S. democracy. We also know that another Trump campaign advisor, Roger Stone, admitted to contact with known Russian agents including contact that might be seen to suggest collusion regarding the timing of releases of hacked documents damaging to the Hillary Clinton campaign.
 
Trump has been aware of the controversy surrounding these ties even before the GOP Convention last year. He has obviously been aware of the investigations into these ties since his victory. Not only has this apparently not colored his public actions, but, on the contrary, he has repeatedly expressed admiration for Vladimir Putin, support for Moscow’s attack on U.S. democracy, support for policies that would benefit the Russians, and as recently as the past week has espoused a view that the Russians were not behind these attacks — despite the unanimous view of the entire U.S. intelligence community.
 
When on January 24, Trump was told by the acting attorney general of the United States, Sally Yates, that there was compelling evidence that Flynn had lied and that he might be compromised by the Russians, Trump did nothing. For three weeks, Flynn continued to serve as national security advisor, take classified briefings, sit in on sensitive calls, appoint personnel, and oversee the national security activities of the Trump administration. It was not until a newspaper report revealed the investigation into Flynn that Trump was forced to reluctantly let him go. Before that, ostensibly for other reasons but that also showed his contempt for the independent operations of the Justice Department, Trump fired the woman who had brought him the news about Flynn.
 
Now, days after that woman’s testimony before Congress and prior testimony by the director of the FBI made it clear that there was an ongoing, serious investigation of the Trump team’s ties to Russia, the president has chosen to fire the head of the FBI. In the middle of an investigation into the possibility that some of his closest advisors committed extraordinarily serious crimes — and before anyone could know what Trump’s role in or knowledge of those crimes might have been — Trump has fired the man heading the investigation into his team. When one includes the dismissal of former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, this makes the third high-profile firing of someone playing a pivotal role into the investigation of the Trump administration in the brief time since the president took office.
 
We don’t know what crimes may or may not have been committed — but we do see several patterns of behavior. All are deeply worrisome. Trump has repeatedly shown a reckless disregard for U.S. national security and national interests. He has shown a contempt for the law and for the American legal system. And when challenges to the legality of the behavior of his associates have arisen, Trump has repeatedly acted in ways that appear intended to prevent or impede the ability of those who would seek the truth. (Perhaps worse, he regularly takes to Twitter and other media to do to them what he never does to the Russians who attacked our democracy: denigrate and discredit those individuals for doing their jobs and upholding their sworn duties.)
 
This deeply disturbing behavior is only made more worrisome by the fact that in other circumstances, as when the legality of immigration policies were repeatedly struck down by the courts, he has attacked judges and shown no appreciation for their independent and equivalent status to the executive branch in our system of government. In other words, he has repeatedly shown a desire to attack the system, laws, and Constitution he swore an oath to uphold. He has done so using all the tools of a demagogue and some of those more commonly associated with authoritarian regimes.

 
We have reached a moment of crisis in the history of American democracy. One has to go back to Richard Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre to find an effort equivalent to the Slow Motion Massacre of Yates, Bharara, and Comey as they carried forward their investigative responsibilities. But the pressure on others in government will grow. CNN has reported that grand jury subpoenas have been issued for Flynn associates with regard to the Russia matter. They have also reported that the Senate Finance Committee is seeking financial records of the Trump team (which must necessarily include Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, given the history of their business dealings with Russians) as part of their investigation.
 

But while this investigation is gaining momentum, Trump is acting more brazenly and desperately (as illustrated not just by the Comey action or his tweets seeking to intimidate Sally Yates prior to her testimony, but also by his bizarre behavior including, for example, the weird, distorted, and misleading interpretation of the testimony of former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper). Trump’s dismissal letter of Comey also strangely referenced “three separate occasions” on which the FBI director informed the president that he was not “under investigation” before going on to say, that he “nevertheless” agreed with the Department of Justice that Comey should be fired.
 
What does that “nevertheless” mean? It seems to suggest that had Comey not allegedly said Trump wasn’t under investigation, he would have had grounds to dismiss him.

 
Trump is acting like a desperate man, not to mention a guilty one. That his team, in particular Kellyanne Conway, has gone on television to argue that somehow the Comey firing was okay because Trump is not personally under investigation is the defense of a narcissist who does not understand the responsibilities he has as president. It is lie after lie after deception after misstatement to protect their man. With every syllable they utter, they make him look more guilty.
 
This activity is not lost on the rest of the world. They see an America unlike any they can recall and a leader who is clearly not fit for office. Said one diplomat from a close ally in this hemisphere, “We often have discussions at home as to whether Trump is crazy. We think he is. We have had experience with leaders like this in South America. But I never expected to see it in Washington.” It is a sentiment I have heard in one form or another often in the past few weeks.
 
America looks like a country it has never been. Trump is a laughingstock in the best of circumstances, a disgrace based on his known behavior to date, and a threat to global order and security with each action he takes. He discredits the office he holds and the government he leads.
 
But for every depredation or attack on our system by Trump and his team, for every act of complicity by the invertebrates who lead the GOP on Capitol Hill, there has been some portion of the U.S. government and system to counterbalance it. Judges have stayed bad executive orders. The FBI has investigated — personal career consequences for the investigators be damned.
 
The brazen firing of Comey is an escalation. If Trump is allowed to get away with this and appoint a lackey as chief investigator into his team’s alleged wrong-doing, the world will see the United States as a failing state, one that is turning its back on the core ideas on which it was founded — that no individual is above the law and that those in the government, at every level including the president, work for the people. Only if an independent prosecutor is appointed will America be seen as being the nation of laws it has long represented itself to be. Only if a thorough investigation takes place that includes an examination of Trump family ties in Russia (and elsewhere) and how these may have compromised the United States will the message be sent that America is the nation that has for so long been seen as an example to the world.
 
It will require a bipartisan commitment to truth and justice. Ultimately, and the sooner the better, it will require our system and people to reject Trump and those surrounding him — who have already done so much to disgrace the offices they hold undermine America’s standing in the world.
 

 

Link to comment

radikalni rezovi su bili neophodni u fbi, ako trampara želi da isuši močvaru, potreban mu je direktor koji će narediti agentima da iskopaju prljavštinu čitavog vojno-industrijskog kompleksa, a ne samo kao do sada kada su ozbiljno češljali predsedničke kandidate i uhvatili po nekog poslanika u primanju mita svake prestupne godine ^_^

Edited by gone fishing
Link to comment

...krvožedna babetina na koju sečeš vene,...

 

Ma pusti babu, jesi video kako su generali-pucisti smenili hrabrog sefa policije koji samo sto nije objavio dokaze da su babi krvave ruke do lakata? Steta sto su Trampari vezane ruke, odma bi reagovao na ovu svinjariju generala. 

 

Budjo, racunaj da sam i tebe prozvao djuture sa drama efendijom.

Link to comment

Cenim da ce nam ti objasniti - koliko ono imas uopste iskustva sa "pravim" demokratijama? Jesi ikada glasao u jednoj od njih? Bio clan neke demokratske stranke sa 150 godina tradicije? Angazovao se politicki kao gradjanin nekog razvijenog demokratskog drustva? 

 

 

Banana drzava indeed - ni ne cudi sa toliko politickih nepismenih biraca.

 

Nesto citam ove tvoje umotvorine, pa mi dodje tesko i mucno: njihtm tamotm sad odjednom ima тушта и тма politicki nepismenih.

A ziveli, glasali preko 150 godina u razvijenom demokratskom drustvu, imaju iskustva sa pravim demokratijama, bili clanovi...

 

Nije tebi lako... :cry:

Link to comment

Ma pusti babu, jesi video kako su generali-pucisti smenili hrabrog sefa policije koji samo sto nije objavio dokaze da su babi krvave ruke do lakata? Steta sto su Trampari vezane ruke, odma bi reagovao na ovu svinjariju generala. 

 

Budjo, racunaj da sam i tebe prozvao djuture sa drama efendijom.

 

Obama is gone, Hillary is still a loser, Comey is gone, Bannon and Gorka are still in place and you get the privilege of enjoying another day of being under your president, Donald. J. Trump.

Link to comment

Ma pusti babu, jesi video kako su generali-pucisti smenili hrabrog sefa policije koji samo sto nije objavio dokaze da su babi krvave ruke do lakata? Steta sto su Trampari vezane ruke, odma bi reagovao na ovu svinjariju generala. 

 

Budjo, racunaj da sam i tebe prozvao djuture sa drama efendijom.

 

ObiW, je l si video Maxine?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/10/maxine_waters_i_dont_support_trump_firing_comey_i_would_support_hillary_clinton_firing_comey.html

 

 

Maxine Waters: I Don't Support Trump Firing Comey, I Would Support Hillary Clinton Firing Comey
Link to comment

 

E Budjo jesi video sta rade generali puchisti, teraju jadnog Trampa da kao marioneta pozira sa Lavrovim i kagebeovcem ruskim amabsadorom:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/oval-office-photos-donald-trump-russians/index.html

 

(redoran, racunaj da sam i tebe prozvao u vezi ovoga)

Link to comment

zvanicni fotograf pravi fotografije i objavljuje ih na internetu?  :ohmy: skandal.

srecom tu su istrazivaci iz vasington posta. mozda je fotograf nosio i naliv-pero koje se pretvara u pistolj?

 

The White House may have permitted a security breach when it let the Russian government take photographs

 

Former American intelligence officials are criticizing TASS’s ability to enter the White House as a potential major security breach, according to a report by The Washington Post. Surveillance equipment like listening devices can be concealed in electronic equipment like cameras, according to these experts, and it was irresponsible at best for the White House to allow a foreign government with a history of spying like Russia to enter a sensitive government building with them.

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...