Tenis radi tenisa

[harper]

harpere, baci neki tekst, dosadno u tri materine sada kada nema turnira :D

Dobio si ga za manje od cetiri minuta. Jel' ti sad jasno kako uspevam da nakucam tolike tekstove?

[freakns]

Dobio si ga za manje od cetiri minuta. Jel' ti sad jasno kako uspevam da nakucam tolike tekstove?

broj 1 i Klodovik, zajedno, u svom najboljem izdanju! :D

[anantaram]

Harpere, vrati se !

ili barem ukljuci anonymous login. izgledas smesno ovako :P

[Time Crisis]

Ako je neko propustio, dobar tekst :)

Llodra-Zimonjic: Strength & UnityDEUCE Magazineby Matt Fitzgerald | 24.08.2011Nenad Zimonjic and Michael Llodra head to New York City as one of the US Open favourites, having won 11 of their past 12 matches.They have established themselves as one of the most imposing doubles teams on the ATP World Tour this season. With powerful serves, solid hands at the net and years of experience winning matches on the grandest stages, it’s no surprise that Nenad Zimonjic and Michael Llodra have flourished in 2011 - their first year together.Zimonjic had the perfect end to the 2010 season. After closing out a three-year partnership with Daniel Nestor by winning the Barclays ATP World Tour Finals, the 35 year old was part of Serbia’s first Davis Cup champion team.Llodra's story was the complete opposite. "We've known each other for a long time, but I didn't know Michael that well off court"Across the net from the spirited Serbians was the disheartened French squad. Llodra helped put his country ahead 2-1 with Arnaud Clement, rallying from two sets down to claim the doubles rubber against Zimonjic and Viktor Troicki, only to see his Davis Cup dreams dashed in a loss to Troicki in the deciding singles match.It was a tough situation, but playing against each other on the world stage wasn’t as complicated as it could have been, given the two hadn’t been teammates yet, according to Zimonjic. “I think it was easier that way than playing the tie after being together for a year or two,” Zimonjic expressed to DEUCE in Cincinnati. “We are both professionals. When you step on the court, you try to win no matter which player is on the other side. We were very respectful to our opponents and there was no exception in that match.“Michael was trying to do his best for his team and I was trying to do the same. He won the doubles match but we ended up winning the tie. I was very disappointed to lose the doubles rubber since we were up two sets to love. But at the end, Mika had to play the deciding match against Viktor which he lost, and it was really difficult for him. The whole year, he played unbelievable… didn’t lose one match in the Davis Cup until the last one.”Zimonjic, Llodra In forming a new partnership, their alliance has provided both different perspectives, a change-up to what they’ve been accustomed to in the past.Llodra’s previous full-time partnerships were with his countrymen and good friends, Fabrice Santoro and Clement, so his decision to join forces with Zimonjic wasn’t a foregone conclusion. "Last year, Nenad called me and said it would be a good opportunity to play with him, because he had a high ranking and thought we would play good together," Llodra discloses."I said, 'Thank you for the offer but I have to think about it. Usually I play with French players.' After a week, I decided to play with him because it was a great opportunity. With my age, I think I can play singles and doubles and I thought I have the chance to play with one of the best doubles players in the world."Llodra has been a change of pace for Zimonjic too; his past partners include Nestor, Santoro, Leander Paes and Julian Knowle. "We’ve known each other for a long time, but I didn’t know Michael that well off court," Zimonjic admits. "I knew that he likes to joke around and that he’s not the most serious guy. It’s nice off the court as you spend a lot of time with your partner and he makes it more fun and interesting."Zimonjic calculated their combined experience on the court and common approach of playing serve and volley tennis to be a winning formula. "You try to predict if you can play well together, if you can complement each other both on and off the court," says the Serb. "I thought with Mika, we'd have great potential, both being aggressive serve and volley players. He's a lefty and I'm a righty and both of us have big serves." "We have a good energy on the court and off"Equally as valuable as being in tune on court is a harmony away from the game, believes Llodra. "We have a good time on the court and also off, which I think is the most important thing… to enjoy the person you are playing with."He’s a great guy. It’s crucial for me to play with a guy I enjoy being around. Also, he has the perfect game for doubles with a huge serve and pretty good hands and volleys. He has a lot of experience, has been World No. 1, has won Grand Slams, so it’s very important for me to realise the chance to play with him. But also I try to help him with my experience in singles and doubles. We listen to each other and have good communication."Zimonjic concurs with the Paris resident. “We have a good energy on the court and off. When we’re on the court, we’re pretty serious, trying to concentrate, trying to do our best.“Off the court he’s the boss, organising where we’re going to go, whether it’s to celebrate or to go to dinner. He likes red wine, and knows a lot about it, so I get to learn and taste some great wines being with him.“Once you get to play with somebody more, you get to know them better. You get to know what they like to do and how you can help them. Those are the things we are still learning about each other and developing."Zimonjic, Llodra Their synchronicity has come to life during the North American summer hard-court season, after displaying consistency throughout the year, including semi-final showings at Roland Garros and Wimbledon.Ashley Fisher explains, "Llodra and Zimonjic really do all the things well that make a good doubles team. Nenad is as fundamentally sound a doubles player as you will find and has had success with a variety of partners. Llodra is one of the few players that has the ability to successfully serve and volley in singles and has the ability to take over a doubles match with his shot making. Together they make a formidable doubles team who are capable of beating any team in the world."In recent weeks, Llodra and Zimonjic have broken through for their first team title at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic in Washington D.C., saving four match points in both the semi-finals and final, and followed their triumph up with an impressive title run at the Rogers Cup, defeating World No. 1 Bob Bryan and Mike Bryan in the championship match. “It’s definitely a great feeling to finally get the titles. We didn’t play our best tennis, but we found a way to win as a team,” says Zimonjic.“On the way to the title, we saved four match points in both the semi-finals and final, which was like a miracle, but we made it and that helped us the following week in Montreal when we got into tight situations. I’m really happy the way the partnership is going and I think we are improving with every match.” "It took Llodra and Zimonjic half the year to fire on all cylinders, but now that they are, the rest of the doubles tour better look out"Though it took eight months to claim their first title together, Llodra wasn’t concerned, believing the two were well on their way to success after reaching the final of the Mutua Madrid Open in May. "It’s always difficult when you play with a new player. You need time to see how you will play together," states Llodra. "Since Madrid, we’ve played pretty good. Our tactics are much better and we understand each other more on the court. It just takes time, as you need practice and matches to feel comfortable. Since we’ve arrived in the US, we’ve played well."Neither player has advanced to the US Open final, but Llodra is optimistic about their chances. "The goal is to win the majors. We’ll have to work hard to get there but if we play well like we did this summer, we have a good chance. But there are many doubles teams that can win.”For Fisher, the duo have been slow burners. Sending a warning to Llodra and Zimonjic's rivals, he says, "Doubles requires chemistry and it has taken Llodra and Zimonjic half the year to fire on all cylinders, but now that they are, the rest of the doubles tour better look out."

[nexus13]

Red je da se ova malo zapostavljena tema podigne....:)Primecujem da provejava misljenje kako je Rafa sinoc odigrao najbolju partiju protiv Novaka ove sezone. Ja bih rekao da mu je Nole dalji nego ikada. Tri seta brutalnog oducavanja od tenisa, gde je brejknut 11 puta, i nadigran u svakom mogucem smislu. Za zivota ne videh reterniranje slicno sinocnjem. Najveci udeo u proslogodisnjem uzimanju USO imao je Rafin servis. U drugom setu, covek ima preko 80% ubacenog prvog servisa, i ne moze da opepeli. Svaki je ritern isao ili pod noge, na samu liniju, ili u cosak. Takvu nemoc na svom servisu ne videh od Dementijeve. Samo upornost i ludi sticaj okolnosti (ledja), spasli su Rafu totalnog rezultatskog debakla, sto se na srecu nije desilo jer bi bilo apsolutno nezasluzeno, u mecu gde je prosecan gem trajao punih 7 minuta. Tu dolazimo do Bodove konstatacije...It’s also futile to take a macro-view of a match in which the two men combined to produce 88 unforced errors (Djokovic, the winner, accounted for 51 of them). Those stats tell you nothing whatsoever about the contest, for most of those errors occurred after either man had seemingly won the point two or three times, and were mistakes born of courage and vision rather than fear or calculation. Most players would die to make errors of the quality these men coughed up today.Rafa se trudio da poen produzi sto je vise moguce, jos jacim spinovima sa forhenda, i jako velikim brojem slajs bekenda. Rezultovalo je nizom spektakularnih poena, gemova, ali i jos jednim porazom, gde realno, ni u jednom trenutku nije imao sansu. U tome se vidi velicina Noletove igre. U jednom od najboljih meceva decenije, gde doskorasnji br.1 igra svoj maksimum, u top formi, ti na sve imas odgovor, i suvim kvalitetom takav mec rutinski dobijas.Takodje bih dodao da je po meni ovo najbolji match-up u poslednjih 15-20 godina, uz Sampras-Agassi varijantu. U svakom mecu jedan iz drugog izvlace apsolutni maksimum, i jako je malo medjusobnih susreta, gde se pobednik lako dobio.

[Jean-Luc Picard]

Nemam pojma gde ovo može da ide. Dal ovde ili na "tenis 2011" il možda na "smešni tenis"... sve u svemu suza mi je u oku zaiskrila ..... "tata, oprosti mi moju ružnu prošlost" link

[dùda]

ovi uz monda su napravili pateticnu, srceparajucu pricu. tipicno za nase novinare.kada se pogleda klip, devojka prica posve normalno, bez patetike. sada mi je jos draza.sto rece onomad jedna forumasica na nekom drugom mestu, iz jelene prosto izbija neki aristokratski duh.

Edited September 27, 2011 by duda

[anantaram]

Na TENNIS.COM ide odbrojavanje najboljih sezona u Open Eri (od 1968)Za sad su stigli do 6. mesta10. Borg 19799. McEnroe 19818. Wilander 19887. Nadal 20106. Federer 2007I sad dolazi najkontroverzniji deo. Treba razvrstati od 1. do 5. mesta: Fed 2004 i 2006, Nole 2011, McEnroe 1984, Connors 1974. Ja bi to ovako:5. Connors (jeste 3 slema, ali druga su to vremena bila, molim lepo)4. Fed 2004 2/3 Fed 2006 i Nole 1. McEnroe Nole je imao vise vaznih turnira i pozitivan skor protiv svih igraca, ali nije stigao do finala svih slemova i zabrljao je u finisu. Federer je imao vise turnira ukupno, finala sva 4 slema (kao i WTFa), bolji procenat pobeda, mnogo vise odigranih meceva, ali jedan manje Masters, los skor protiv Nadala i katastrofalnu konkurenciju (Ljuba No.3 ).

Edited December 4, 2011 by anantaram

[anantaram]

Zaboravio sam Lejvera. Mrzi me da ga ubacujem, niti imam blage veze kako se tad igrao tenis, na kom nivou je bila konkurencija, vaznost turnira i slicno ... a Wikipedia mi je tek peto-sesto mesto informisanja.

Edited December 4, 2011 by anantaram

[dùda]

meni se čini da je jednom prilikom i sam mcenroe izjavio da je noletova sezona bolja od njegove i to zato što ju je ostvario u eri feda i nadala, tj goata je pobedio 4 puta a aktuelanog broja 1 isto 4 puta pa još dva puta (kao broja 2 već) u finalima slemačini mi se da u tom smislu niko nije imao takav učinak ni blizu

[Jean-Luc Picard]

Jeste! stoposto je J.Mc. to izjavio. Dobro se sećam...

[dùda]

Ja bi to ovako:5. Connors (jeste 3 slema, ali druga su to vremena bila, molim lepo)4. Fed 2004 2/3 Fed 2006 i Nole 1. McEnroe Nole je imao vise vaznih turnira i pozitivan skor protiv svih igraca, ali nije stigao do finala svih slemova i zabrljao je u finisu. Federer je imao vise turnira ukupno, finala sva 4 slema (kao i WTFa), bolji procenat pobeda, mnogo vise odigranih meceva, ali jedan manje Masters, los skor protiv Nadala i katastrofalnu konkurenciju (Ljuba No.3 ).

broj 5 si pogodio. čekamo sledeće :)

No. 5: Jimmy Connors, 1974The Brash Basher of Belleville had been occasionally beating his elders for four years, but 1974 was the season when all of young Jimbo’s prophecies of dominance came true. Mowing opponents down with his revolutionary two-handed backhand, the 21-year-old bashed his way to the first three Grand Slam wins of his career, at the Australian Open, Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. Most famously, he put exclamation points on the last two with his merciless demolitions of aging Australian legend Ken Rosewall in the finals—his 6-1, 6-0, 6-1 win in the Open final was the most lopsided in the tournament’s history. It wasn’t just the majors where Connors excelled; he went 93-4, the second-highest winning percentage (95.9) in the Open era, after John McEnroe’s in 1984. But ’74 would leave the bittersweet taste of “what if” in Connors’ mouth. Because Connors had played World Team Tennis that year, angering the ATP and ITF—he was barred from playing the French Open.

[freakns]

za mene je Pedererova 2006 top. simply put, igrao je finale RG, NJole je igrao polufinale. taj wtf na kraju, za to sam rekao, to je meni neozbiljan tenis i nebitan turnir(znam da ga ljudi mahom cene, ali pricam iz moje perspektive). i taj jedan mec je razlika. mada zaista za dlaku zbog onih silnih Mastersa sto ih NJole opro... e sada dal no2 NJole ili Mac, tja, ipak bih dao NJoletu prednost jer kada je Mac to odradio vise me je brinulo dal mi se pelene slazu sa zepicama nego sto sam uopste i znao sta je tenis :D

[MrX]

Nema dileme da je Novakova 2011. jaca od Mekove najjace sezone jer tada nije bilo mastersa, cak ni na AO nisu svi dolazili, a lakse je osvajati turnire i praviti nizove sa okrnjenom konkurencijom nego kad imas 14 skupova gde se okupe bukvalno svi.Sto se tice poredjenja 2006. vs 2011. slazem se da 3 GS + 4 mastersa + finale + WTF zvuci bolje od 3 GS + polufinale + 5 mastersa, slazem se i da je Novak zavrsio sezonu nekoliko meseci pre roka, ali ono sta je Novakova najveca prednost u ovom poredjenju, a koju ne treba zaboraviti je da je Fed u svojoj najboljoj sezoni imao 2:4 protiv najveceg rivala dok je Novak svog najveceg rivala oduvao svuda i svugde, u finalima, na sljaci, u njegovoj avliji sa 6:0 (plus i njega sa 4:1, dok 2006. treci reket nije bio merodavan)

[Afterburner]

meni se čini da je jednom prilikom i sam mcenroe izjavio da je noletova sezona bolja od njegove i to zato što ju je ostvario u eri feda i nadala, tj goata je pobedio 4 puta a aktuelanog broja 1 isto 4 puta pa još dva puta (kao broja 2 već) u finalima slemačini mi se da u tom smislu niko nije imao takav učinak ni blizu

mc, zajendo sa jos nekim teniskim legendama je takodje izjavio i da je novakova 2011 sezona najbolje do sada vidjeno u tenisudominacija nad prvim i drugim igracem od kojih je jedan goat, a drugi potencijalni goat po meni eliminise bilo kakvu dvojbu oko prvog mesta