malkin Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) ne videh nigde drugde na forumu, pa reko ovde da okačim: The 2015 Universitas 21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems, published on 21 May The ranking of 50 countries compares 25 measures across four weighted areas: spending by the government and the private sector on teaching and research; the number of research articles produced and the quality of the top institutions; connections with businesses and international institutions; and government policy and the regulatory environment. For a second year, Universitas 21, a group of research-intensive universities from across the world, has also produced an alternative ranking that looks at whether a country does better or worse on these measures than would be expected based on the purchasing power of an average citizen. Serbia takes the top spot in the income-adjusted ranking. :0.6: Its rise from fourth in last year’s list was driven by high scores for output and resources devoted to higher education. bang for the buck, bato! mada moglo je komotno da ide i na Srbin pobedijo However, Professor Marginson warned that Serbia’s prominence was “idiosyncratic” and a consequence of its very low per capita GDP for a European country and of its concentration of research resources and talent at the University of Belgrade, which boosts its score on the output measures. Edited May 30, 2015 by malkin
Shan Jan Posted May 31, 2015 Posted May 31, 2015 Tuga bozja... BTW, 10. RSA se vecito kotira kao jedna od najgorih zemalja po kvalitetu skolstva. To koliko para spucas u njega ne mora puno da znaci...
Time Crisis Posted June 3, 2015 Posted June 3, 2015 Problem slabih rezultata na PISA testiranju rešen na efektan način: Ђаци из Србије у 2015. години неће учествовати у међународној провери постигнућа - ПИСА тестирању, јер је наша земља каснила са процедуром и није на време потписан уговор, што су пратили и нерешени финансијски проблеми. Финансијски проблеми утицали су и на то да Министарство просвете одустане и од намере да ове године спроведе национално тестирање по узору на ПИСА студију.
rajka Posted June 3, 2015 Posted June 3, 2015 pa da, kao sto kaze motivacioni poster; work smarter, not harder.
maximus Posted June 5, 2015 Author Posted June 5, 2015 srbijica bi mogla malo da oladi sa visokim skolstvom In 1960, countries with an education level of 8.3 years of schooling were 5.5 times richer than those with 2.8 year of schooling. By contrast, countries that had increased their education from 2.8 years of schooling in 1960 to 8.3 years of schooling in 2010 were only 167% richer. Clearly, something other than education is needed to generate prosperity. China started with less education than Tunisia, Mexico, Kenya, or Iran in 1960, and had made less progress than them by 2010. And yet, in terms of economic growth, China blew all of them out of the water. The experience within countries is also revealing. In Mexico, the average income of men aged 25-30 with a full primary education differs by more than a factor of three between poorer municipalities and richer ones. The difference cannot possibly be related to educational quality, because those who moved from poor municipalities to richer ones also earned more. And there is more bad news for the “education, education, education” crowd: Most of the skills that a labor force possesses were acquired on the job. What a society knows how to do is known mainly in its firms, not in its schools. At most modern firms, fewer than 15% of the positions are open for entry-level workers, meaning that employers demand something that the education system cannot – and is not expected – to provide. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/education-economic-growth-by-ricardo-hausmann-2015-05 srbiyitza will be srbiyitza with or w/o edumacation:)
Tribun_Populi Posted June 5, 2015 Posted June 5, 2015 A mene napalo što šaljem ljude u večernje škole, jerbo kad se obrazuju biće gladni sa stilom, ovako samo gladni.
maximus Posted June 6, 2015 Author Posted June 6, 2015 grandmothers and frogs typical country with ten years of schooling had a per capita income of $30,000 in 2010, per capita income in Albania, Armenia, and Sri Lanka, which have achieved that level of schooling, was less than $5,000. Whatever is preventing these countries from becoming richer, it is not lack of edumacation(sic maximus)
Dagmar Posted June 6, 2015 Posted June 6, 2015 Pa nije obrazovanje jedina determinanata za bogatstvo. Ono potreban, ali ne i dovoljan uslov.
MancMellow Posted June 6, 2015 Posted June 6, 2015 typical country with ten years of schooling had a per capita income of $30,000 in 2010, per capita income in Albania, Armenia, and Sri Lanka, which have achieved that level of schooling, was less than $5,000. Whatever is preventing these countries from becoming richer, it is not lack of edumacation(sic maximus) +1 kad bi imali samo 3godisnje zanatske skole u jermeniji bi se zivelo ko u svajcarskoj
Eraserhead Posted June 6, 2015 Posted June 6, 2015 U principu. Bolje obrazovanje = bolji TFP = veci output = vece blagostanje. Obrazovanje jeste vazno.
Tribun_Populi Posted June 6, 2015 Posted June 6, 2015 And there is more bad news for the “education, education, education” crowd: Most of the skills that a labor force possesses were acquired on the job. What a society knows how to do is known mainly in its firms, not in its schools. At most modern firms, fewer than 15% of the positions are open for entry-level workers, meaning that employers demand something that the education system cannot – and is not expected – to provide. This.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now