Trump - hoće li biti impeachment ili 8 godina drugačijeg predsednikovanja?

[marv]

Njega su doveli iskljucivo oni koji su za njega glasali i podrzavali ga. A uzivacemo svi.

 

ti mozes da lazes sebe koliko hoces ali sanse da ovaj moron udje u belu kucu bile su 1:google ali zahvaljujuci vasim sranjima...

Edited July 6, 2017 by marv

[Eraserhead]

ti mozes da lazes sebe koliko hoces ali sanse da ovaj moron udje u belu kucu bile su 1:google ali zahvaljujuci vasim sranjima...

Ti znas da ja nisam gotivio Hilari i da sam je gledao kao manje zlo ali zadrzavam pravo da smatram budalom svakoga ko je podrzavao psiha. Isto kao sto kod nas smatram budalama one koji su mislili da su se radikali ikada promenili.

[marv]

Ti znas da ja nisam gotivio Hilari i da sam je gledao kao manje zlo ali zadrzavam pravo da smatram budalom svakoga ko je podrzavao psiha. Isto kao sto kod nas smatram budalama one koji su mislili da su se radikali ikada promenili.

 

pa dobro onda nemoj da etiketiras fashistom svakoga koji smatra da su tramp i ovi drugi isti qrac ili da je tramp manje zlo, ja sa ovim stvorenjem nemam nista zajednicko (jedino sto mogu da se slozim je mozda njegov stav o abortaciji), inace lik mi je odvratan u svakom smislu, ali opet u poredjenju sa ovima on deluje ok, ne znam kako da ti drugacije da ti objasnim nego da citiram goldu meir nesto kao we cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children

[dillinger]

Uobičajena moralna relativizacija, zlodelo je kad susedno pleme našima otme kravu, a dobro delo je kad naši otmu njihovima.

 

Asanž je "pacov iz ambasade" koji iznosi privatne informacije, a kad CNN preti iznošenjem privatnih informacija... pa dobro™, oni samo disciplinuju rasistički ološ.

Uu da, pacov Asanz izlozio opasnosti jadne nezasticene marince u Iraku, tako bese? Edited July 6, 2017 by dillinger

[Eraserhead]

Uobičajena moralna relativizacija, zlodelo je kad susedno pleme našima otme kravu, a dobro delo je kad naši otmu njihovima. 

 

Asanž je "pacov iz ambasade" koji iznosi privatne informacije, a kad CNN preti iznošenjem privatnih informacija... pa dobro™, oni samo disciplinuju rasistički ološ.

 

Asanzje izneo privatne informacije ljudi koji se bore za ljudska prava u paradiktatorskim rezimima (poput Erdoganovog). CNN u ovom slucaju NIJE izneo licne podatke ali je zapretio doticnom rasisti da ce to uciniti ako ne prestane sa objavama. I sad je Asanz dobar lik a CNN je zao. Kako je uopste to uporedivo?

[braca]

this is war!

sta bi rekli da im charlie hebdo naprave karikaturu (al naravno da nece, kolege)...samospalili bi se svi do jednog na sunsetu. kakvi jadnici isfrustirani

 

Ti ama vala bas nista ne znas o Charlie...

[Weenie Pooh]

Asanzje izneo privatne informacije ljudi koji se bore za ljudska prava u paradiktatorskim rezimima (poput Erdoganovog). CNN u ovom slucaju NIJE izneo licne podatke ali je zapretio doticnom rasisti da ce to uciniti ako ne prestane sa objavama. I sad je Asanz dobar lik a CNN je zao. Kako je uopste to uporedivo?

 

Situacije su različite, ali to tebe ne sprečava da efektno promašiš fudbal i tamo i ovamo. 

 

Sa jedne strane imaš ovakve borce za ljudska prava u paradiktatorskim režimima:

 

S druge strane imaš CNN koji preti doxxingom da bi iznudio ponizno izvinjenje od lika koji je stavio njihov logo na klip Trampa kako bije tamo nekog rvača™. Otvorenu pretnju jedne velike medijske organizacije upućenu pojedincu koji im je indirektno ugrozio sujetu ti pravdaš činjenicom da je dotični u drugim prilikama takođe iznosio rasističke i antisemtiske stavove. Svesno zatvaraš oči pred činjenicom da CNN neporecivo boli dupe za rasizam i antisemitizam na internetu, da su se obrušili isključivo na anonimnog lika koji je Trampu dao municiju da ih proziva. Samom Trampu, naravno, mogu da pljunu pod prozor ali zato šilje penis nad nebitnom budalom koja se drznula da ih izloži poruzi.

 

Da bi se osudilo delovanje WL a podržalo delovanje CNN, potrebno je biti sa jedne strane samoobmanjeni idiot a sa druge strane cinično đubre, not necessarily in that order.

[theanswer]

Eraser je u stvari Neera Tanden, nema druge.

[Eraserhead]

...

Ti si bez razloga uvukao wikileaks i tog prevaranta u pricu i to tako da si potpuno sve promasio i upleo se ko pile u kucine. Sad da bi se izvukao treba da pricamo o CNNu i Wilileaksu. Nemam nameru. Plus ni o jednima ni o drugima nemam dobro misljenje ali se CNN donekle moralnije ponasa.

 

Ovaj rasista je dobio sto je trazio. Bez neke possbne pohvale CNNu jer su branili svoj interes pre svega ali kukanje sto su ga "ucenili". Ko ga jebe. Ko oseca simpatije prema liku i delu neka ga brani.

[Weenie Pooh]

Naravno, samo nastavi da ignorišeš zajedničku nit nedozvoljenog puštanja poverljivih/privatnih informacija u javnost.

 

Tako će ti lakše biti da održiš stav po kom je jedno kriminalna pacovska radnja koja ugrožava slobodarske inicijative, a drugo hrabra medijska borba protiv rasizma i antisemitizma.

[marv]

interesantno je koliko ovom liku vazno anonimnost naspram novca koji moze dobiti ako bude tuzio cnn i satisfakcije da im se osveti i ponizi ih

[mjone]

Ovaj rasista je dobio sto je trazio. Bez neke possbne pohvale CNNu jer su branili svoj interes pre svega ali kukanje sto su ga "ucenili". Ko ga jebe. Ko oseca simpatije prema liku i delu neka ga brani.

opasno gresis, mnogo je to zeznut teren

zamisli da  Informer npr. dodje do nekih imena sa foruma koji hejtuju Informer a tipa pisali su nesto sto neko moze da kapira kao "anti-srpsko"

pa pocne sa ovim "mekim ucenama"... slozio bi se sa tim ?

[Anduril]

Naravno, samo nastavi da ignorišeš zajedničku nit nedozvoljenog puštanja poverljivih/privatnih informacija u javnost.

 

Tako će ti lakše biti da održiš stav po kom je jedno kriminalna pacovska radnja koja ugrožava slobodarske inicijative, a drugo hrabra medijska borba protiv rasizma i antisemitizma.

 

Kako te ne mrzi da smaras i poredis ovaj pojedinacan slucaj sa onim sto je radio Vikiliks? O, zaboravio sam - opet tupava sve je to isto logika.

 

 

Wikileaks has drawn criticism for violating the personal privacy of a multitude of individuals and inadequately curating its content. These critics include transparency advocates, such as Edward Snowden, the Sunlight Foundation and the Federation of American Scientists.^[22]

Wikileaks has published individuals' Social Security numbers, medical information, and credit card numbers.^[23] An analysis by the Associated Press found that Wikileaks had in one of its mass-disclosures published "the personal information of hundreds of people — including sick children, rape victims and mental health patients".^[23] Wikileaks has named teenage rape victims, and outed an individual arrested for homosexuality in Saudi Arabia.^[23] Some of Wikileaks' cables "described patients with psychiatric conditions, seriously ill children or refugees".^[23] An analysis of Wikileaks' Saudi cables "turned up more than 500 passport, identity, academic or employment files... three dozen records pertaining to family issues in the cables — including messages about marriages, divorces, missing children, elopements and custody battles. Many are very personal, like the marital certificates that reveal whether the bride was a virgin. Others deal with Saudis who are deeply in debt, including one man who says his wife stole his money. One divorce document details a male partner's infertility. Others identify the partners of women suffering from sexually transmitted diseases including HIV and Hepatitis C."^[23] Two individuals named in the DNC leaks were targeted by identity thieves following Wikileaks' reveal of their Social Security and credit card information.^[23] In its leak of DNC e-mails, Wikileaks revealed the details of an ordinary staffer's suicide attempt and brought attention to it through a tweet.^[362][363]

Wikileaks' publishing of Sony's hacked e-mails drew criticism for violating the privacy of Sony's employees and for failing to be in the public interest.^[364][365] Michael A. Cohen, a fellow at the Century Foundation, argues that "data dumps like these represent a threat to our already shrinking zone of privacy."^[364] He noted that the willingness of Wikileaks to publish information of this type encourages hacking and cybertheft: "With ready and willing amplifiers, what’s to deter the next cyberthief from stealing a company’s database of information and threatening to send it to Wikileaks if a list of demands aren't met?"^[364]

The Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for open government, has criticised Wikileaks for inadequate curation of its content and for "weaponised transparency," writing that with the DNC leaks, "Wikileaks again failed the due diligence review we expect of putatively journalistic entities when it published the personal information of ordinary citizens, including passport and Social Security numbers contained in the hacked emails of Democratic National Committee staff. We are not alone in raising ethical questions about Wikileaks' shift from whistleblower to platform for weaponised transparency. Any organisation that 'doxxes' a public is harming privacy."^[366] The manner in which Wikileaks publishes content can have the effect of censoring political enemies: "Wikileaks' indiscriminate disclosure in this case is perhaps the closest we’ve seen in reality to the bogeyman projected by enemies to reform — that transparency is just a Trojan Horse for chilling speech and silencing political enemies."^[366]

In July 2016, Edward Snowden criticised Wikileaks for insufficiently curating its content.^[24] When Snowden made data public, he did so by working with the Washington Post, the Guardian and other news organisations, choosing only to make documents public which exposed National Security Agency surveillance programs.^[24] Content that compromised national security or exposed sensitive personal information was withheld.^[24] Wikileaks, on the other hand, makes little effort to remove sensitive personal information or withhold content with adverse national security implications. Wikileaks responded by accusing Snowden of pandering to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.^[24]

University of North Carolina Professor Zeynep Tufekci has criticised Wikileaks for exposing sensitive personal information: "WikiLeaks, for example, gleefully tweeted to its millions of followers that a Clinton Foundation employee had attempted suicide... Data dumps by WikiLeaks have outed rape victims and gay people in Saudi Arabia, private citizens' emails and personal information in Turkey, and the voice mail messages of Democratic National Committee staff members."^[25] She argues these data dumps which violate personal privacy without being in the public interest "threaten our ability to dissent by destroying privacy and unleashing a glut of questionable information that functions, somewhat unexpectedly, as its own form of censorship, rather than as a way to illuminate the maneuverings of the powerful."^[25]

In January 2017, the Wikileaks Task Force, a Twitter account associated with Wikileaks,^[367] proposed the creation of a database to track verified Twitter users, including sensitive personal information on individuals' homes, families and finances.^{[368][367][369]} According to the Chicago Tribune, "the proposal faced a sharp and swift backlash as technologists, journalists and security researchers slammed the idea as a 'sinister' and dangerous abuse of power and privacy."^[368] Twitter furthermore bans the use of Twitter data for "surveillance purposes," stating "Posting another person's private and confidential information is a violation of the Twitter rules."^[367]

[marv]

https://www.facebook.com/boredpanda/videos/10155541171404252/ 

 

aldrin dobija fizicke bolove slusajuci trampa 

[bradilko]

Asanzje izneo privatne informacije ljudi koji se bore za ljudska prava u paradiktatorskim rezimima (poput Erdoganovog). CNN u ovom slucaju NIJE izneo licne podatke ali je zapretio doticnom rasisti da ce to uciniti ako ne prestane sa objavama. I sad je Asanz dobar lik a CNN je zao. Kako je uopste to uporedivo?

ne valja wikileaks al zato valja pink,rtcg,cnn..samo da godi demokratskom uvu.može bez pravila ako je za našu stvar..

sve je to isto, što bi rekao tihomir sa zapada