Jump to content
IGNORED

tvrdnja dana


betty

Recommended Posts

Ovo je toliko očigledan false, da se pitam u čemu je štos.
app je smislio novi stos! ovaj put je dao odgovor na nek drugo pitanje u odnosu na ono koje je postavio!
People don't take brands personally.
FALSE!brands_zps471533c0.jpg
Link to comment
  • Replies 372
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • betty

    79

  • Indy

    65

  • Turnbull

    25

  • gagorder

    20

Top Posters In This Topic

u medjuvremenu sam saznala da je coveku toplije ako razmislja o bliskim ljudima...tvrdnja dana:People living in a city are no more or less helpful and altruistic than people living in the rural countryside.True or False?

jos jedna neuspela replikacija istrazivanja iz wtf domena (bold u apstraktu moj):Sean P. Carlin and Lionel G. Standing (2013) IS INTELLIGENCE ENHANCED BY LETTER PRIMING? A FAILURE TO REPLICATE THE RESULTS OF CIANI AND SHELDON (2010)1,2. Psychological Reports: Volume 112, Issue , pp. 533-544.doi: 10.2466/04.03.PR0.112.2.533-544IS INTELLIGENCE ENHANCED BY LETTER PRIMING? A FAILURE TO REPLICATE THE RESULTS OF CIANI AND SHELDON (2010),2Sean P. Carlin1 and Lionel G. Standing11Bishop's UniversitySummary.—Previous research has suggested that motivational processes outside an individual's conscious awareness may be primed so as to enhance or impair cognitive performance. The present study involved a conceptual replication of the 2010 study of Ciani and Sheldon (Experiments 1 and 2), employing the same materials and task, to test whether exposure to the letter A before an analogies test improved performance and the letter F impaired it, relative to the neutral letter J. It also examined the effect of pre-exposing participants before testing to a positive or negative verbal passage concerning letter grades. Priming was not found to have any effect: the participants (N = 116), under both pre-exposure conditions, gave analogies scores which were virtually identical whether they had been primed with A, F, or J, thus contradicting the previous results. It is concluded that there is a pressing need for more replications of priming experiments as well as other studies.

Link to comment

False...U manjim ruralnim zajednicama ljudi su upućeniji jedni na drugu, češće će biti u situaciji da zavise od nekog kao i da neko zavisi od njih. Verujem da to razvija spremnost da se pomogne. U velikim gradovima ljudi su otuđeni jedni od drugih i mislim da nemaju tako razvijen osećaj zajedništva.

Link to comment
People living in a city are no more or less helpful and altruistic than people living in the rural countryside.True or False?
Pitanje je lose formulisano.Pitanje je u stvari: "People living in a city are as helpful and altruistic as people living in the rural countryside." True znaci da jesu, False samo znaci da mislis da postoji razlika u altruizmu, ali ne kazuje u kom smeru.False je logicki neispravan odgovor. Stoga cu reci True.
Link to comment
People living in a city are no more or less helpful and altruistic than people living in the rural countryside.
FALSE!Let's tell you why!People living in cities are generally less helpful to strangers than their rural counterparts. An analysis od many studies found this effect to be stable across variations in the type of help sought as well as various other experimental manipulations. Evidence suggests this effect is due to the situational context of the urban environment, as opposed to personality differences between rural and city dwellers. Mehrkens Steblay, N. (1987). Helping behavior in rural and urban environments: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 346-356.za danas, tvrdnja dana gde ne znam sta da odgovorim:If one avoids a tedious task and another does not, then one may feel morally superior to that person.True or False?a u spoileru, jos jedna ne-replikacija prethodno objavljenog efekta konceptualnog primovanja. spoileri su bitni jer nam unapred nesto kazu o istrazivanjima koja ce mozda biti predmet tvrdnje buducih dana :)

Can the Goal of Honesty be Primed?

  • a University of California, San Diego
  • b University of South Florida

In a simple study involving 64 participants, Rasinski, Visser, Zagatsky, and Rickett (2005) reported that requiring people to make semantic judgments involving four words related to honesty (embedded among other words) increased the likelihood that they would later admit to having engaged in problematic alcohol-related behaviors (e.g., drinking to the point of blackout.) If valid, this honesty-priming effect would offer a powerful intervention to improve the validity of self-report data in many different contexts. To determine whether the effect is repeatable, we first attempted two replications using the same materials, tasks, and measures used by Rasinski et al. Experiment 1 repeated the study with a sample of 150 students. No priming effects were observed here, nor in a follow-up study using adults recruited on the web (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 used the same priming manipulation together with a more refined measure of response candor (derived from Paulhus, 1991). Again, the honesty-related primes had no detectable effects.

Edited by betty
Link to comment
If one avoids a tedious task and another does not, then one may feel morally superior to that person.True or False?
Ko sastavlja ova pitanja, Mrs Bucket?764460219_983230.gifAnyway, True.
Link to comment
Ko sastavlja ova pitanja, Mrs Bucket?
internacionalni tim psihologa zaposlenih na univerzitetima -_-nekoliko holandskih i nekoliko americkih, ako me secanje dobro sluzi.
Link to comment

evo malo o appu i o tvorcima:

What do YOU know about people? Do you think that you know the human psyche? And, do you know the human psyche better than your friends?You can now test your knowledge through one new statement each day, at least until the 27th September 2013. All statements are offered at the same time to all, as are the answers! Compete with others, while learning a cool fact daily.Main features:* Plain and simple: A daily claim on human social behavior* Develop your personal knowledge regarding social behavior* No self-help books for you. Learn how humans behave* Compare your knowledge against your friends/classroom (using groups)* Transform your Android into your own psychology professor* Get a reminder each day, you can set the time (or turn it off)Here's the app that will put your mind to the test. Social K assesses your knowledge about human behavior and teaches you facts that you may have never known!New scientific findings, classical theories - brought to you in an accessible way: Every day, you receive a claim about how humans act, feel, and think. We ask you: Is it true? The next day we'll tell you whether you were correct and we will tell you what others thought.Social Knowledge is the first app of its kind and tests your understanding of scientific findings in the most fun way. You can even use it as a teaching aid!The content of Social K was developed by the In-Mind Foundation, an organization run by scientists devoted to provide edutainment on social psychology, bringing science to you in the most fun way. The scientists work at prestigious universities worldwide, distilling scientific findings for you. Humans are innately social - and ALL feelings, behaviors, and thoughts are inherently influenced by their social context. Now you get to know how.The app according to the experts:John Cacioppo, the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago and founder of the field of social neuroscience: “Think you know people? Think again. This fun and educational app provides provides new insights into how people think and why they (and you) act as they do.”Harry Reis, former president of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology and professor at the University of Rochester: “What a great way to have fun and learn something, too.”"Recognized as social psychology resource by the European Association for Social Psychology: http://www.easp.eu/t...s/resources.htm"
bas sam juce nasla nekog ko kritikuje najnoviji rad ovog cacioppo tipa! objavili su kako brakovi duze opstaju ako su se ljudi prvo sreli online, a ono neka mizerna velicina efekta (odnosno razlika u duzini braka je realno zanemarljiva u prakticnom smislu) i neka jedva znacajna statisticka znacajnost.... ali ne sumnjam novine uskoro pisati o tome. Who are we? Hans IJzerman - Founding Editor & President In-Mind FoundationDr. Hans IJzerman, the Founding Editor of In-Mind Magazine, received his Bachelor Degree in Psychology from Saint Vincent College in the United States. Once he returned to the Netherlands, he earned a Master’s Degree from VU University and a PhD from Utrecht University, both in Social Psychology. He is now an Assistant Professor at Tilburg University, focusing on cognitive models for social dynamics and culture - with a focus on grounded cognition (more popularly called embodiment). You can reach his personal homepage here.E-mail: editor@in-mind.org Selin Kesebir - Editor-in-ChiefDr. Selin Kesebir completed her bachelor degrees in International Relations and Economics at Koç University in Turkey. She received her M.A. from Northwestern University in cognitive psychology, and her Ph.D from the University of Virginia in social psychology. Currently she is a post-doctoral research fellow at University of Virginia's Darden School of Business. You can reach her personal page here.E-mail: s.kesebir@in-mind.org Reine van der Wal - Editor-in-chiefReine van der Wal completed her Research Masters in Social & Health Psychology at Utrecht University. Currently, she works as a Ph.D. student at Radboud University Nijmegen under the supervision of Dr. Karremans. In her PhD-project, she examines the role of children’s cognitive control capacities in their ability to forgive offending peers. Reine is also the secretary of the In-Mind Foundation.E-mail: r.vd.wal@in-mind.org Hannah Nohlen - Associate EditorHannah Nohlen received her Master’s degree in Behavioural Science from Radboud University Nijmegen. Since the beginning of 2010 she is a PhD student at the Social Psychology Department at the University of Amsterdam, where she works together with Frenk van Harreveld, Mark Rotteveel, and Joop van der Pligt. Her PhD project focuses on ambivalent decision-making and choice conflicts.E-mail: h.nohlen@in-mind.org Lay See Ong - Associate EditorLay See Ong is a postgraduate student at the Singapore Management University. Supervised by Angela Leung, her research interests varies (too broadly for her own good!) from creativity to mobility and self-regulation. One of her recent research projects investigated the beliefs about hierarchy amongst high and low relational mobility individuals. To know more her research exploits, you can visit her website. As a side project, she is also exploring and advocating the use of the virtual world, Second Life, for psychological research. While she’s not working, she enjoys good music, bodyrocking and chasing after her new love: The Balenciaga Lariat.E-mail: l.ong@in-mind.org Ashley Waggoner - Associate EditorAshley Waggoner received her B.S. from the University of Toronto in 2006, where she worked with Dr. William Cunningham. Currently she is working toward her Ph.D. in Social Psychology at Indiana University, where she works with Dr. Eliot Smith. She has a wide-range of research interests, which generally involve examining the influence of specific social contextual factors on our thoughts, attitudes, emotions, and impressions of other people. Some current lines of research include examining the role of social context in implicit emotion priming, and investigating the role of gossip (and other dynamic processes) in person perception.E-mail: a.waggoner@in-mind.org Namkje Koudenburg - Associate Editor & Coordinator In-Mind CommitteeNamkje Koudenburg received both her Bachelor and Master’s degree in Social Psychology at the University of Groningen. At the same university, she is currently working toward her Ph.D. together with Dr. Tom Postmes and Dr. Ernestine Gordijn. Her research mainly concerns group dynamics. Specifically, in her Ph.D. project she examines the effects of conversational flow and silences on social needs and perceptions of consensus. In a different line of research she investigates voters’ perceptions on non-voting.E-mail: n.koudenburg@in-mind.org Clare N. Jonas - Associate EditorClare Jonas heirs from the United Kingdom, where she received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from Warwick University. She pursued a Master's Degree in Neuroscience at VU University in Amsterdam, and has recently commenced a Ph. D. Studentship in Sussex. Her area of expertise is in human neuroscience, where she is particularly interested in synaesthesia, consciousness, and vision.E-mail: c.jonas@in-mind.org Rosanna Guadagno - Associate EditorDr. Rosanna Guadagno received her Ph.D. in Social Psychology from Arizona State University in 2003 where she studied social influence and persuasion and developed a strong interest in the use of online social interaction as a means of social influence. To extend her knowledge of the impact of technology on social interaction, Dr. Guadagno spent three years as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Research Center for Virtual Environments and Behavior at the University of California, Santa Barbara where she studied persuasion and non-verbal behavior in immersive virtual environments. Currently, Dr. Guadagno is an Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama where she directs the Online Social Influence Lab.E-mail: r.guadagno@in-mind.org Ishani Banerji - Associate EditorIshani Banerji is from India and came to the United States in 2002 to pursue a Bachelor's degree at Denison University. After graduating with a double major in Psychology and Cinema, she completed an M.A. from Wake Forest University. She is now completing a Ph.D. in social psychology at Indiana University under Dr. Eliot Smith. Her research interests are quite eclectic and include the study of emotions, cultural psychology, intergroup processes, social networks, and impression formation.E-mail: i.banerji@in-mind.org Daniel Sligte - Associate EditorDaniel Sligte completed his Bachelor and Research Master degree - major in I/O and minor in Social Psychology - at the University of Amsterdam. For his Master he visited New York University as a research intern. After having worked as a research consultant, he is currently doing a PhD at the department of Industrial/ Organizational Psychology of the University of Amsterdam on creativity. Daniel is also the treasurer of the In-Mind Foundation.E-mail: d.sligte@in-mind.org Dylan Selterman - Associate EditorDr. Dylan Selterman completed his Bachelor's degree in Psychology at Johns Hopkins University in 2006, and then completed his Master's and Ph.D. In Social Psychology at Stony Brook University in 2011, working with Drs. Everett Waters and Art Aron. Dylan is now a visiting professor of social psychology at the University of Maryland, College Park, and also writes for ScienceofRelationships.com. Dylan's research interests include interpersonal relationships (romantic, friendship), dreams, jealousy, infidelity, and moral psychology. His current projects examine how people form moral judgments (what behaviors are right or wrong) within the context of close relationships, and what kinds of dreams people have about their romantic partners.E-mail: d.selterman@in-mind.org Diana Onu - Associate EditorDiana holds a BA in Psychology from the University of Bucharest, Romania, and an MSc in Social and Organisational Psychology from the University of Exeter, in the UK. She is currently a PhD student at the University of Exeter. She works in the in the field of intergroup relations, trying to figure out when and why some social groups choose to emulate the success of other groups.E-mail: d.onu@in-mind.org Stephanie Blom - In-Mind Committee - HeadlinesStephanie Blom completed her Bachelors in both Social and Organizational Psychology at Utrecht University. After working as a research assistant at the University Medical Centre Utrecht for one year, she followed the Research Masters in Social & Health Psychology at Utrecht University, during which she worked as a research assistant for dr. G. Semin. Currently, she is working as a PhD student at Utrecht University under the supervision of dr. G. Semin. Her research is focused on facial mimicry, and on specifying the parameters of simulation processes involved in the facial expression of emotions. Please send all your headlines about social psychology to Stephanie!E-mail: headlines@in-mind.org Mariko Visserman - In-Mind Committee - Public RelationsMariko Visserman completed her Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology at the Radboud University Nijmegen. In 2010 she started the Research Master ‘Behavioural Science’ at the same university. She is currently working on her master project, supervised by Dr. Johan Karremans. In this project she examines relationship protective mechanisms in romantic relationships, especially in dealing with attractive alternatives. For In-Mind she works together with Aafke on In-Mind magazine’s visibility in the media.E-mail: media@in-mind.org Aafke van Mourik Broekman - In-Mind Committee - Public RelationsAafke finished her Bachelor's degree in Communication and is currently doing her Master's in Social Psychology at the University of Groningen. Under supervision of Namkje Koudenburg she is working on her master thesis. This research is on the effects of speech coordination on group collaboration and entitativity.For In-Mind she works together with Mariko on In-Mind magazine’s visibility in the media.E-mail: media@in-mind.org Wim Pouw - In-Mind Committee - Book ReviewsWim Pouw (Netherlands) completed his Bachelor degree in Social Psychology at VU University Amsterdam and is currently completing the Research Masters in Social Psychology at VU University Amsterdam. Next year he will pursue a Master degree in Theoretical Psychology with embodied cognition as his main research interest whilst doing experimental research on the same topic. As a book reviewer for In-Mind, Wim hopes to enthuse people to read new books as well as “the classics” central to Social Psychology.E-mail: bibliography@in-mind.org Lotte van der Zanden - In-Mind Committee - Community ManagerLotte van der Zanden completed her bachelor’s degree in Psychology at the Radboud University Nijmegen. In 2010, she started with the research master Behavioural Science at the same university. She is currently working on her master thesis, supervised by Rob Holland and Johan Karremans. Her main research interest is facilitation of behavior change using implementation intentions. For In-Mind, she will assist in updating the website and she will represent the magazine online using social media.E-mail: online@in-mind.org Daniel Sude - Quiz Team CoordinatorDaniel Sude completed his Bachelor's degree in social anthropology at Dartmouth College in 2007. He is currently completing a Master's in Social Psychology and the Social Sciences from the University of Chicago, where he studies under Dr. Kimberly Morrison. At the University of Chicago, he studies epistemic motivations and their relationship to morality and political ideology. Ellie Shockley - Quiz TeamElizabeth Shockley is currently a doctoral student under Penny Visser in the Social Psychology Program at the University of Chicago and coordinates the In-Mind quiz. While earning her B.S. in Psychology from Duke University, she worked in several social psychology labs. For two years following graduation, she worked as a research coordinator in a clinical psychology lab. At Chicago she studies political psychology, and her research interests include political ideology and political participation. You can find her personal page here. Laura Finch - Quiz TeamLaura Finch earned her B.S. in Human Development at Cornell University, with concentrations in Social and Personality development, as well as Nutrition and Health. She currently works as a Research Project Manager at The University of Chicago’s Social Neuroscience Lab, investigating how social relationships influence health outcomes. In the fall of 2012 she will begin graduate school as a doctoral student in UCLA’s Health Psychology program. Laura is interested in researching how biopsychosocial and environmental factors influence eating behavior. With a better understanding of the psychology of eating, she hopes to assist with the development of practical solutions for reversing the obesity epidemic. Kasey van Tyne - Quiz TeamKasey Van Tyne is a doctoral student in the Social Psychology Program at the University of Chicago. She earned her bachelor's degree in Psychology in 2010 from Smith College in Northampton, MA. While at Smith she worked with Byron L. Zamboanga examining adolescent and young adult alcohol use. She transitioned from studying developmental psychology to social psychology in graduate school, and her research interests fall broadly in the domains of attitudes, identity, and sustainability. Currently, she is working with Kimberly Morrison exploring how individuals respond to threats to their environmental identity. Justin Cheng - Quiz TeamJustin Cheng earned his bachelors degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, where he worked in several laboratories including those of Neal Roese and Chi-yue Chiu, bestowing upon him a profound interest in all things social psychology. He is currently a doctoral student under Victor Ottati at the Loyola University Chicago. His research goal is to explore the complex networks of sociocultural and cognitive processes underlying peoples’ appraisal of social, cultural, and political systems. He enthusiastically embraces the mission of bringing the lessons of social psychology to those outside of traditional academic settings. René Kopietz - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind GermanDr. René Kopietz received his "Psychologie-Diplom" (German equivalent to a Master's degree) in March, 2005 at the University of Cologne, Germany. Since then he has worked investigating audience-tuning effects on memory at Bielefeld University and at the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany. René received his PhD in social psychology in May 2009 from Bielefeld University and is now a Teaching Fellow at University College London. As of recent, René - together with Malte Friese - has also taken up the challenge to launch the German version of In-Mind! For more about René and his work visit his personal website.E-mail: r.kopietz@in-mind.org Malte Friese - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind GermanDr. Malte Friese studied psychology with a focus on social psychology in Trier (Germany) and Heidelberg (Germany). He received his Diploma (equivalent to Masters Degree) in 2003. After a year of traveling he started working as a PhD student in the department of Social and Economic Psychology at the University of Basel in Switzerland. He received his degree in 2008 for his dissertation on moderators of the predictive validity of implicit measures. Since then Malte is working as an Assistant Professor equivalent in research and teaching in Basel. His main research interests cover self-control and self-regulation, implicit social cognition, and consumer psychology.E-mail: m.friese@in-mind.org Tomás Palma - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind PortugueseTomás Palma did his training in Psychology at ISPA, Lisbon, in the area of Organizational and Social Psychology. After receiving my Master Degree in the end of 2007, he worked as a research assistant for Leonel Garcia-Marques and his Social Cognition team (SOCAS). Currently he is working as a PhD student at ISCTE- Lisbon University Institute, and at the University of Utrecht. His research is supervised by Margarida Garrido and Gün Semin, and is mainly focused on exploring the relation between the areas of person memory and grounded cognition, namely in understanding whether (and how) memory processes (e.g., encoding and retrieval) in impression formation are constrained (or not) by the social context.E-mail: t.palma@in-mind.org Rui Soares Costa - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind PortugueseDr. Rui Soares Costa received his PhD in December 2009 from ISCTE-IUL (Lisbon University Institute). His research work was conducted between ISCTE, the University of Lisbon and the University of California, Davis, where he has been working with Jeff Sherman. He is broadly interested in social cognition, particularly the question of how people process information about social targets in the domain of impression formation. His research interests are primarily focused on memory processes. His current research is investigating the interplay between person memory and memory for serial order (from human memory). More specifically, Rui is concerned with the question of how order information is represented and retrieved in person perception. At the present time, he is a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Lisbon and Princeton University, working with Leonel Garcia-Marques and Alexander Todorov. His post-doc involves expanding this research program into the social cognitive neuroscience arena.Personal website: www.rui-s-costa.comE-mail: r.costa@in-mind.org Giulio Boccato - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind ItalianDr. Giulio Boccato graduated from the University of Padova in Social and Organizational Psychology. He received his PhD in Psychology from theCatholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve. He is currently an assistantprofessor in Social Psychology at the University of Bergamo. His researchmainly focuses on intergroup relations, particularly in the interplaybetween categorization and de-humanization. Guilio is the editor-in-chief of In-Mind Italy, which will soon be launched!E-mail: g.boccato@in-mind.org Luca Andrighetto - Editor-in-Chief In-Mind ItalianDr. Luca Andrighetto received his PhD in Social Psychology from the University of Padova in 2008. He is now a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Milano-Bicocca. In his post-doc project he is examining the psychological inhibitors of intergroup dehumanization, especially within conflicting contexts. Currently, he is also focusing on how perception of being discriminated affect people’s interactions with out-group members. Luca is the other editor-in-chief of In-Mind Italy, which will soon be launched!E-mail: l.andrighetto@in-mind.org
Link to comment

ja ocito nisam razumela ko je ovde 'one' a ko je 'that person'...

If one avoids a tedious task and another does not, then one may feel morally superior to that person.
True!Let's tell you why!Jordan and Monin asked some participants to perform a tedious task, others to watch another participant (actually a researcher!) quit a tedious task, and still others to both perform the task and watch someone else quit the task. Those people who performed the task and watched someone else quit tended to feel morally superior. The researchers suggest that watching someone else quit made these people feel threatened. Why did they perform the tedious task when they could have quit at any time? Oh, it's because they were morally superior of course! Interestingly, when participants focused on a valued personal quality before the task (which you may recognize, in the jargon of social psychology, as a self-affirmation exercise) the tendency to feel superior was attenuated. So the next time you feel self-righteous, you may ask yourself, once you've calmed down, whether you were also feeling personally threatened.Jordan, A. H., & Monin, B. (2008). From Sucker to Saint Moralization in Response to Self-Threat. Psychological Science, 19(8), 809-815.tvrdnja dana:When faced with a challenge to their American identity, Asian Americans are less likely to report preferring and eating prototypically American foods (e.g. hamburgers, pizza).True or False?

prototypically :isuse:

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...