tvrdnja dana

[Indy]

Onaj pavllle je imao natpis "click here to see me naked" :D

[betty]

ja sam ovde odabrala false, jer znam za istrazivanja gde je pokazano da ima vise stete nego koristi za ljude koji imaju psihickih problema. medjutim, intuitivno, cinilo mi se da to ne bi trebalo da vazi za ljude koji su generalno ok, samo imaju neki trenutni problem. meni bar, kad sam ok, pomaze i da ignorisem probleme i da kazem sebi da sam super, i da ce proci, i razne druge stvari koje nisu dobra praksa za rad s nekim kome je toliko lose da je potrazio pomoc terapeuta.ali app me je zajebao! sve sto sam rekla je tacno, ali je odgovor true :D toliko o mojoj intuiciji; ne zahvata tvorce appa.

Positive self-statements ("I'm a lovable person") have been found to boost mood and self-esteem.

TRUE!Let's tell you why!This is true for some people, but not everyone. Two experiments revealed that among participants with low self-esteem, those who repeated a positive self-statement or who focused on how that statement was true tended to feel worse than those who did not repeat the statement or who focused on how it was both true and not true. Among participants with high self-esteem, those who repeated the statement or focused on how it was true felt better than those who did not, but to a limited degree. Repeating positive self-statements may backfire for the very people who "need" them the most. Wood, J. V., Perunovic, W. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Positive Self-Statements Power for Some, Peril for Others. Psychological Science, 20(7), 860-866.

[betty]

tvrdnja dana:Taking another person's perspective tends to make people less selfish.True or False?

[Agni]

True.Edit: ima neke veze sa empatijom, kladim se.

Edited May 15, 2013 by Radagast

[ordi]

F

[Amelija]

TRUE!

oe! :Da i današnju izjavu smatram za tačnu

[Indy]

Jebem li ga ako nije True.

[Patty Lee]

tvrdnja dana:Taking another person's perspective tends to make people less selfish.True or False?

true.

[betty]

e, ono od juce je true, prekucacu 'let's tell you why!' kad budem u prilici.

[betty]

tvrdnja dana:Taking another person's perspective tends to make people less selfish.True or False?

k vragu, nove tvrdnje su mi izgurale objasnjenje za ovu! a delovalo je solidno, vise studija, vise nacina zauzimanja tudje pozicije (sta osoba oseca, sta osoba misli), i vise nivoa sebicnosti. jednoj osobi je dopalo da odredi sta ce ona, a sta neko drugi, raditi u timskom zadatku, pri cemu su razliciti zadaci razlicito neprijatni. uglavnom, kad god je doslo do nekog perspective-takinga prvo, ljudi su bili skloniji da drugoj osobi dodele pozeljnije zadatke.nego, otvorimo vikend s dve tvrdnje:IQ is related to the choice of a vegetarian vs. omnivorous diet.True or False?Single women tend to be more attracted to men who are already in a relationship than to men who are unattached.True or False?

[betty]

a za one koji prate temu-u-temi, link za simpozijum o istrazivanjima u socijalnoj psihologiji koji mi je ovih dana uleteo u inbox, i jedna statisticka kritika istrazivanja u psiholoskom casopisu s najvisim impactom. izdvajam komentar sa kojim se slazem od glave do pete:

Psychology and most of biological research has radically changed in the past couple of decades. Despite this, the math-based course requirements for most undergrad psychology departments (and most other bio majors) is still the pre-med requirements of physics and calculus plus an introduction to statistics course which doesn’t go far beyond probability, t-tests, and ANOVA. For a graduate degree in psychology, you’ll have to take one more intro stats course that re-covers probability, t-tests, and ANOVA in a bit more depth. Beyond whether Baysean statistics should be a requirement, why can’t there just be agreement that more formal quantitative training is required before calling someone competent in a biological field? Personally, I’d love to see two semesters of undergrad statistics or courses with a heavy statistical/data visualization component, and one semester of a course with a heavy programming/scripting component.

[Indy]

IQ is related to the choice of a vegetarian vs. omnivorous diet.True or False?Single women tend to be more attracted to men who are already in a relationship than to men who are unattached.True or False?

TrueTrue

[halloween]

Ako je tacno ono sto pise B92 zivot i Blic zena, ovo je sve tacno.

Edited May 18, 2013 by halloween

[Indy]

Ako je tacno ono sto pise B92 zivot i Blic zena, oba su istinite tvrdnje.

Je li? Ja to ne citam.Za ovo prvo, mislim da su omnivori inteligentniji od vegetarijanaca :DZa drugo, znam kad su (tek) zenske pocele da se interesuju za mene. (Doduse, u malom broju).

[Dagmar]

k vragu, nove tvrdnje su mi izgurale objasnjenje za ovu! a delovalo je solidno, vise studija, vise nacina zauzimanja tudje pozicije (sta osoba oseca, sta osoba misli), i vise nivoa sebicnosti. jednoj osobi je dopalo da odredi sta ce ona, a sta neko drugi, raditi u timskom zadatku, pri cemu su razliciti zadaci razlicito neprijatni. uglavnom, kad god je doslo do nekog perspective-takinga prvo, ljudi su bili skloniji da drugoj osobi dodele pozeljnije zadatke.nego, otvorimo vikend s dve tvrdnje:IQ is related to the choice of a vegetarian vs. omnivorous diet.True or False?Single women tend to be more attracted to men who are already in a relationship than to men who are unattached.True or False?

truetrueOvo drugo važi i za muškarce, da su im interesantnije žene u vezi (nego ista ta žena kada je single). Ili rečima moje majke - Dušo, na ženi najbolje stoji pogled drugog muškarca -_-