dragance Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) Kad smo već kod analiza Trumpa, evo vam ova - čisto da se vidi na šta će ga urnisati i zašto je daleko od dobrog kandidata za GOP: The Washington Post has an article detailing the different positions of Donald Trump on various issues. Now these are not different positions over a couple of decades, or even a couple of years. These are different positions over just a couple of months. They find: 7 different positions on how to defeat the Islamic State 6 different positions on illegal immigration 6 different positions on tax reform 2 different positions on the Iran deal 4 different positions on Obamacare So that’s just in the last couple of months. Further back, and you will find he changed sides on almost all the big issues in the US. He was a registered Democrat back in 2001. In 1999 he was fully pro-choice for abortion. He swapped to pro-life in 2011. In 1999 he promoted a one off extra tax of 14% of wealth to pay off the national debt. Went from anti-drugs to advocating in 2011 they should be legalised. In 2008 was pro free trade and in 2015 advocated for an import tax of 35%. Was for an assault weapon ban in 2000 but now against gun control Called for universal healthcare in 2000, now against Obamacare Those who support Trump because they think he is conservative might get a nasty shock if he ever achieved elective office. Edit: link ka članku http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/17/20-times-donald-trump-has-changed-his-mind-since-june/?hpid=z3 Edited August 19, 2015 by dragance Link to comment
Eraserhead Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Mene ovo podseca na to kad su kod nas mediji pokusavali da pljuvajuci Seselja mu stanu na put ne kapirajuci da mu tako samo daju na vaznosti. Link to comment
maximus Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 El Jebito Bush ima apparently mootavu zenu koja nakon 41 godine braka nije u stanju da sastavi 2words in English!?! hm, drzi je u podrumu sa Geronimo lobanjom? Link to comment
maximus Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 ali da ne bude zabune - el jebe je novi precednik a mootava zena ce mu biti 1 spokeswoman Link to comment
Anduril Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Kad smo već kod analiza Trumpa, evo vam ova - čisto da se vidi na šta će ga urnisati i zašto je daleko od dobrog kandidata za GOP: The Washington Post has an article detailing the different positions of Donald Trump on various issues. Now these are not different positions over a couple of decades, or even a couple of years. These are different positions over just a couple of months. They find: 7 different positions on how to defeat the Islamic State 6 different positions on illegal immigration 6 different positions on tax reform 2 different positions on the Iran deal 4 different positions on Obamacare So that’s just in the last couple of months. Further back, and you will find he changed sides on almost all the big issues in the US. He was a registered Democrat back in 2001. In 1999 he was fully pro-choice for abortion. He swapped to pro-life in 2011. In 1999 he promoted a one off extra tax of 14% of wealth to pay off the national debt. Went from anti-drugs to advocating in 2011 they should be legalised. In 2008 was pro free trade and in 2015 advocated for an import tax of 35%. Was for an assault weapon ban in 2000 but now against gun control Called for universal healthcare in 2000, now against Obamacare Those who support Trump because they think he is conservative might get a nasty shock if he ever achieved elective office. Edit: link ka članku http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/17/20-times-donald-trump-has-changed-his-mind-since-june/?hpid=z3 Sve OK samo sto se pravila igre menjaju a to jos nisu svi shvatili: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/19/donald-trump-republican-primary-immigration-debate Link to comment
ObiW Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Sve OK samo sto se pravila igre menjaju a to jos nisu svi shvatili: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/19/donald-trump-republican-primary-immigration-debate Al ga je opravio, svaka mu cast. Where once Republicans contemplated whether it was appropriate for any illegal immigrant to be put on a path to citizenship, they are now focused on the merits of mass deportation and ending birthright citizenship Ali pazi, sad ce svi oni da se trkaju ko ce vise i bolje da deportuje, pored 15% glasackog tela (Latinosi) koje ta tema veoma zanima, koje zna da je Demokrata upravo odradio amnestiju za nekoliko miliona ilegalnih emigranata i koje lako moze da sabere dva i dva i da se 90% okrene protiv njih? Ovaj "aj gi sve proteramo" voz je prosao pre 30 godina. Limey jede govna. Link to comment
Weenie Pooh Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Ne brini, Latinose će da navuče tako što uzme Rubia ili ako može Cruza kao running mate, a oni su glupi pa se neće dosetiti... Imao je nedavno fenomenalnu razmenu sa O'Rajlijem u kojoj mu ovaj citira taj i taj ustavni amandman u kom stoji da deca rođena u USA automatski dobijaju državljanstvo i pita ga kako misli to da promeni, a Trump mu mrtav ladan kaže "nije to baš tako, ti si nešto pogrešno pročitao" i gusla dalje o masovnoj deportaciji :D Link to comment
WTF Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Repeal 14. amandmana i neke masovne deportacije su nerealne i prakticno nemoguce. To je samo nesto da zapali najzatucanije i najgluplje. Kao kad su neki pre obecavali da ce da ukinu IRS ili da uvedu gold standard... Link to comment
ObiW Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Repeal 14. amandmana i neke masovne deportacije su nerealne i prakticno nemoguce. To je samo nesto da zapali najzatucanije i najgluplje. +1. To je americka verzija "leba za 3 dinara". Link to comment
hazard Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Meni je hit ta cela antiimigrantska histerija u zemlji koja je imigracijom nastala, i ne samo da je tako nastala, već je to njen nacionalni narativ, počevši s Mayflowerom pa do Ellis Island-a...biće da se iza dosta tog sentimenta krije rasizam, ono, da su ilegalci visoki, beli i plavi mnogo bi manje smetali. Link to comment
Prospero Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Nema više staaarih imigranata :( Link to comment
ObiW Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) Meni je hit ta cela antiimigrantska histerija u zemlji koja je imigracijom nastala, i ne samo da je tako nastala, već je to njen nacionalni narativ, počevši s Mayflowerom pa do Ellis Island-a...biće da se iza dosta tog sentimenta krije rasizam, ono, da su ilegalci visoki, beli i plavi mnogo bi manje smetali. A pa ne mora da bude cist rasizam u pitanju. Evo pre nekoliko nedelja je na susednom topiku potomak crnogorskih brdjana, navodno u sali, trazio da se sirijski emigranti iz Srbije salju u Ameriku. Nije se on "salio" jer je rasista i nece da vidi tamo neke Arape u rodnom Beogradu, nego se "salio" zato sto se podrazumeva da je naseljavanje Beograda zavrseno dolaskom njegovih roditelja. Tako i ovi Amerikanci sto pricaju da treba da se zamandale vrata, i oni isto smatraju da je naseljavanje Amerike zavrsena prica. Edited August 21, 2015 by ObiW Link to comment
Weenie Pooh Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Repeal 14. amandmana i neke masovne deportacije su nerealne i prakticno nemoguce. To je samo nesto da zapali najzatucanije i najgluplje. Kao kad su neki pre obecavali da ce da ukinu IRS ili da uvedu gold standard... Naravno, ali Trump je morao da ode korak dalje sa tvrdnjom da taj amandman suštinski ni ne postoji. "Many lawyers are saying that’s not the way it is. … They’re saying it’s not gonna hold up in court." Posle ga čirlidersica još branila od glupog pro-immigration liberala po imenu Bill O'Reilly, ludilo: Link to comment
theanswer Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Ne brini, Latinose će da navuče tako što uzme Rubia ili ako može Cruza kao running mate, a oni su glupi pa se neće dosetiti... Imao je nedavno fenomenalnu razmenu sa O'Rajlijem u kojoj mu ovaj citira taj i taj ustavni amandman u kom stoji da deca rođena u USA automatski dobijaju državljanstvo i pita ga kako misli to da promeni, a Trump mu mrtav ladan kaže "nije to baš tako, ti si nešto pogrešno pročitao" i gusla dalje o masovnoj deportaciji :D Nije baš tako bilo. U suštini je rekao da sudovi tek treba da odluče o tom amandmanu. Nije sad baš neka krucijalna razlika ali nije baš da je dovodio u pitanje tekst Link to comment
Weenie Pooh Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Kako nije, eno ti gore citat. Ili video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlTOhEGp4VM O'Reilly mu razumno predstavi problem i kaže "You must know all that, right?" Trump kaže "Bill, I think you're wrong about the 14th amendment, many lawyers are saying that's not the way it is. It's not gonna hold up in court. I don't think they have American citizenship." Link to comment
Recommended Posts