Čutura Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 meni je mats uvek mi popravi raspolozenje Quote Link to comment
Moća Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Moze ukratko sta je rekao? Quote Link to comment
clever bastard Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 kvalitetan tenis nedostojan finala,novak pokazao nezrelost jer nije zavrsio u 4 seta,blablablablabla Quote Link to comment
Indy Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Mats Wilander je tačno objasnio Đovaka u najnovijem napisu u New York Timesu. But some believe Djokovic is in position to think bigger. Mats Wilander, the outspoken former tennis champion, said that Djokovic, if healthy, was in position to make a run at Laver and the true Grand Slam by winning all four majors in the same year.Wilander said one of the few things holding Djokovic back was his tendency to telegraph his physical difficulties to his opponents.“The only reason maybe he doesn’t win a match is because he’s looking for energy and he’s showing all of us that he’s looking for it, and that’s unprofessional,” Wilander said. “The only reason Nadal is in it is because he doesn’t look for it. It’s just there, and when Novak learns how to do that, he’s going to be kicking these guys’ tails for a long time.“He’s just so clean with his strokes. It’s just, ‘O.K., let me accelerate.’ And then boom. Nadal just doesn’t have that. It’s amazing, because Novak is cleaner than Federer. He’s like a Marat Safin who moves. It’s the same sort of power.” U osnovi tačno i izuzetno pozitivna ocena... tako da, pravda za Matsa. Quote Link to comment
gone fishing Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 znači matsa nervira ono što i nas kod djokera, često dozvoljava protivnicima da se vrate u meč umesto da ih dokrajči sa 2:0 odnosno 3:0- pedal to the metal do olimpijade :) Quote Link to comment
Nesh Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 (edited) kvalitetan tenis nedostojan finala,novak pokazao nezrelost jer nije zavrsio u 4 seta,blablablablablaNegde oko 6:00: Da je bio profesionalniji, if he was more like Rafael Nadal, pobedio bi u 4 seta. Edited January 31, 2012 by Nesh Quote Link to comment
Indy Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Iskreno, i ja sam šutirao TV što on to nije završio u 4. setu... (S druge strane, onaj Rafa je vraćao lopte za koje je potrebno zakriviti prostor-vreme). Quote Link to comment
Nesh Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Iskreno, i ja sam šutirao TV što on to nije završio u 4. setu... (S druge strane, onaj Rafa je vraćao lopte za koje je potrebno zakriviti prostor-vreme).Ma naravno, samo da, sto rece Mats, if he was more like Rafael Nadal, zavrsio bi u petom setu. Tuzan. Quote Link to comment
Indy Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Mislim da je iz gornjeg NYT citata prilično jasno našta je mislio Mats kad je rekao da bi valjalo da je Đovak više kao Nadal. ;) Mora da ste veliki navijači ako vam ne smeta to što u odsudnim momentima kod Đovaka proradi alergija. Što je doduše veliki napredak u odnosu na drama-queen scene od pre par godina. Ide u dobrom pravcu. Samo da bude malo više kao Nadal. :D Quote Link to comment
Nesh Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Mislim da je iz gornjeg NYT citata prilično jasno našta je mislio Mats kad je rekao da bi valjalo da je Đovak više kao Nadal. ;) Mora da ste veliki navijači ako vam ne smeta to što u odsudnim momentima kod Đovaka proradi alergija. Što je doduše veliki napredak u odnosu na drama-queen scene od pre par godina. Ide u dobrom pravcu. Samo da bude malo više kao Nadal. :DMa jasno je sta je hteo reci, no posto je Nadal u 5. setu imao 4:2 cini mi se 30:15, mozda je mogao reci i da bi Nadal dobio mec "if he (Rafa :D ) was more like Rafael Nadal". ;) Quote Link to comment
Indy Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Poslednji put da gostujem na sportskom delu foruma. :) Quote Link to comment
Nesh Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Poslednji put da gostujem na sportskom delu foruma. :)Ama, samo mi bila zabavna metafora koju je upotrebio, te sam to i primetio. Sorry. Quote Link to comment
anantaram Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Turnir nije doneo ni jednu jedinu promenu na listi od 1-9 mesta. Quote Link to comment
anantaram Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 (edited) Pa, ima pravo Mats ovaj put. Novak je od 2. do 4. seta prao Nadala kao u prolece prosle godine, da bi ga na kraju od poraza spasio jedan od najgorih udaraca u Rafinoj karijeri. Potrebna je strahovita cvrstina da onako preokrenes mec protiv nekoga ko te je ubo u pojam 6 puta u 6 finala samo par meseci ranije.Nole je na ovom turniru po prvi put dokazao limite svoje izdrzljivosti kakve barem ja nisam mogao da zamislim pre nego sto je Pascal izgovorio "game, set, match", ali Rafa je jos uvek bolji ako posmatramo koncentraciju koju moze da investira u svaki pojedinacni poen. Spanac se sigurno ne bi onako jebao sa Marejom u SF i 5 sati konstantno pravio veresiju od meca. Edited January 31, 2012 by anantaram Quote Link to comment
Afterburner Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 ne slazem se...ni sa cimPreveliku autonomiju novaku daju oni koji sebe zovu neutralcima. Zanimljivo. Ne radi se tu o glumatanju alergije -wtf?, losoj koncentraciji i neprofesionalizmu koji je novi biser matsa. Sve greska do greske. Novak nije u formi iz 2011. i tempira je za rg i oi. Oscilacije i losa taktika i pored toga je opet uzeo trofej. To je domaci. Da sam nadal, ne bih se radovala. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.