2 hours ago, porucnik vasic said:

Ниси био огуглао на то минирање 1999-те’

Nakon iskustva kad su mi bombe fijukale iznd glave, i padale na stotinjak metara od mesta gde sam živeo, odjednom zvuci i situacije koje su do tada bile uobičajene (i oguglane na), postaju okidači za traumatična sećanja. To je valjda taj PTSP.

Zato ne razumem ovo podsmevanje ljudima iz tog restorana. Ili možda po tim Dubaijima žive i rade samo kurve, influeserke, menađeri pederi i licimuri, pa je ok naslađivati se njihovim reakcijama na zvuk eksplozije.

Ja to ne kapiram. Kako smo postali takva zaboravna stoka...kao da nismo doživeli nešto slično.

Edited March 3Mar 3 by Filozof manijak

WP:

Arhiviran ceo članak:

https://archive.is/RgFwI

Edited March 3Mar 3 by vememah

9 hours ago, Zaboravan said:

Tebi ništa ne sumnjam.

Meni da beže na pucanj iftarskog topa, nekako mi je normalo da poznaju običaje zemlje u kojoj su.

Rekao bih i da bi bilo pristojno pojaviti se u restoranu kada počinje iftar ne pre, ne bi mi bilo prijatno jesti a da me služe konobari koji ceo dan poste.

Ali ja sam seljober, pusti mene.

7 hours ago, radisa said:

Jel' ima nagde gde mogu da se real time prate balističke rakete i putanje? Kao flightradar, samo umesto aviona, rakete?

Pitam za druga nekrofila...

Ne baš. I to što ima je više clickbait. Sam 24FL ne znači mnogo ni za avione jer ti zanimljivi™ lete bez transpondera a za neke sam poprilično siguran i s lažnim callsign-om.

Kao sto sam napisao prvog dana oko kineza i njihovog pritiska na Iran zbog Ormuza

Izgleda da Epstajnovci nisu jedini koji znaju hakerske fore. Ameri pozvali vojno i diplomatsko osoblje da ne koriste aplikacije kao Uber, Snapchat itd... Izgleda da su na taj način pronalazili mete za napad i da je broj USA žrtava dosta veći od 6.

Samo Mosad ekipa funkcioniše bez greške.

Edited March 3Mar 3 by Jesper23

Iran’s cheap threat: US$20,000 drones vs US$4 million interceptors

Iran and the US may run low on weapons in a matter of days or weeks. Whoever can last longer will gain a serious advantage

Bloomberg

Just several days into the conflict, the Iran war has become attritional. Waves of drone attacks by the Islamic Republic are putting pressure on the defences of the US and its partners from Bahrain to the United Arab Emirates, depleting weapons stockpiles. The outcome of the fight may depend on which side runs out of munitions first.

Shahed-136 one-way attack drones, small, rudimentary cruise missiles, continued to pound targets across the Middle East on Monday. The drones have in recent days hit US bases, oil infrastructure and civilian buildings, since the US and Israel air strikes on Iran – a barrage of cruise missiles, drones and precision-guided bombs - began on Saturday.

US-made Patriot air defence missiles have been largely successful in stopping the Iranian Shaheds and other ballistic missiles, with interception rates over 90 per cent, according to the UAE. But using US$4 million missiles to destroy US$20,000 drones illustrates a problem that has haunted Western military planners since early in the Ukraine war: the cheap weapons can chew up resources meant for much more complex threats.

The result is that both Iran and the US may run low on weapons in a matter of days or weeks. Whoever can last longer will gain a serious advantage.

Iran’s regional proxies were severely weakened by the war in Gaza and its missile capabilities damaged by the earlier Israel-US attacks in a 12-day war in June.

Since then the emphasis for Iran has been to escalate its warnings about the consequences and costs of a Trump strike, knowing that his supporters are broadly opposed to drawn-out, messy wars.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – who died in Saturday’s air strikes – warned that a US attack would lead to wider conflagration embroiling the whole region.

“Attrition strategy makes operational sense from Iran’s perspective,” said Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the Stimson Centre think-tank. “They are calculating the defenders will exhaust their interceptors and the political will of Gulf states will crack and put pressure on the US and Israel to cease operations before they run out of missiles and drones.”

Qatar’s stocks of Patriot interceptor missiles will last four days at the current rate of use, according to an internal analysis seen by Bloomberg News. Doha has been privately urging a swift end to the conflict.

Iran was estimated to have about 2,000 ballistic missiles after last year’s conflict with Israel. It’s likely to have a much larger number of Shaheds, which Russia, the other main manufacturer, has been able to produce at a rate of several hundred per day, according to analysis by Becca Wasser, defence lead at Bloomberg Economics.

Tehran has fired more than 1,200 projectiles since the start of this year’s conflict, with many - perhaps most - of them being Shaheds. That suggests they could be saving more damaging ballistic missiles for sustained attacks, Wasser added.

Iran’s military is acting apparently without close or frequent coordination with the civilian leadership including the ministry of foreign affairs, according to Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

“Our military units are now in fact independent and somehow isolated and they are acting based on instructions, general instructions given to them in advance,” Araghchi, a veteran of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said in an interview to Al Jazeera on Sunday.

On the US side, Wasser added, strike planners are unlikely to have moved enough munitions to the region to continue for four weeks, as President Donald Trump has estimated they would.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a news conference on Monday that: “This is not Iraq, this is not endless”.

Defensively, Iran has little left to fight with. The aerial attacks in the opening hours of the war hit its surface-to-air batteries, the most modern of which were Russian-made S-300s. US and Israeli fighters have been operating in Iranian airspace without any reported difficulties since then.

The US and its regional partners mainly use Lockheed Martin Corp. Patriot air defence systems firing PAC-3 missiles. Although the Pentagon has pushed to increase production, only about 600 PAC-3 missiles were built in 2025, according to Lockheed. Based on how many missiles and drones have been reported shot down, thousands of interceptors have most likely been fired in the Middle East since Saturday.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates also operate THAAD, a Lockheed system designed to hit more advanced, faster-moving missiles at the edges of the atmosphere. Those are unlikely to be used against anything else, and are even more expensive, at about US$12 million per missile.

The US has also used patrols of fighter jets using Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System missiles, which cost US$20,000 to US$30,000 each plus the operating cost of the jets.

Purpose-built anti-drone defences are less common in the region. Using lasers, automatic cannons or even other drones can be a cheaper way to protect towns, cities and installations, saving expensive systems for bigger problems.

The Iron Beam laser developed by Israeli defence company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems is meant to address this issue, but the Israel Defence Forces said on Monday it had not yet been used in the conflict.

If the current intensity of Iranian strikes continues, PAC-3 stockpiles in the region could run dangerously low within days, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive details. If offensive weapons do too, stalemate could take hold.

“In the meantime, Iran’s inventory of missiles and drones may draw down and the regime itself might be able to remain intact, if in chaos,” said Ankit Panda, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “This seems to be a likely outcome based on the first 60 hours of this war.”

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/middle-east/article/3345221/new-satellite-photos-show-apparent-attack-iran-nuclear-site-report?module=perpetual_scroll_1_RM&pgtype=article

Edited March 3Mar 3 by vememah

Posto je Iran zatvorio Ormuz za plovidbu i pusta samo kineske brodove, po pricama, nisam siguran, sta ce da radi Srbija, koja uzima naftu iz Iraka, ako se ovo produzi?

Sta se cekalo decenijama, od 2000te, sa gradnjom naftovoda prema Rumuniji, Madjarskoj, Grkoj, Bugarskoj da se ne zavisi samo od jednog pravca iz Hrvatske?

She added: 'Why is it that under this Prime Minister, international law always seems to be at odds with our national interest?' The Tory leader said British people 'will be wondering why our country's response has been so weak'.

Englezi nezadovoljni svojim premijerom... jebeš međunarodno pravo ako nije u našem interesu

Trenutno

Amerikanci planiraju prmeestanje PVO sistema iz Juzne Koreje na Bliski Istok.

13 minutes ago, Emerald said:

Sta se cekalo decenijama, od 2000te, sa gradnjom naftovoda prema Rumuniji, Madjarskoj, Grkoj, Bugarskoj da se ne zavisi samo od jednog pravca iz Hrvatske?

Srbija je malo trziste i ima potrebu za oko 75k barela dnevno. To je nesto vise od 10k toma nafte.

Poredjenja radi Beograd trosi oko 400k tona vode dnevno.

Previse smo malo trziste da bi se i jedan posten naftovod isplatio. Recimo naftovod Druzba dnevno prenosi oko 1.2M barela dnevno tj za dva dana prenese ono sto je potrebno Srbiji za mesec dana.

8 hours ago, autsajder said:

Naravno da ne može to, niko nije nakačen na vojne radare.

Najbliže ovome što traži radišin drugar su izraelski mediji koji objavljuju momentalno kada su detektovana lansiranja iz Irana i u kom dijelu Izraela će se oglasiti sirene, par minuta prije samih sirena. Taj info dobijaju od vojske.

.

U principu i nema nesto smisla, jer obicna balistika 500 km prelazi za 5-7 minuta, hiperzvuk ne retko dolazi posle uzbune.

Ukrajinci vec godinama imaju razvijen sistem obavestavanja, ne znam kako od koga dobijaju informacije, ali se o svakom podizanju bombardera informise prakticno u realnom vremenu sa predvidjenim mestom udara.

Kad su u pitanju dronovi tu vec postoji nesto sto lici na flight radar, koji prenosi kolicinu, pravac i pretpostavljano mesto udara.

7 minutes ago, x500 said:

Srbija je malo trziste i ima potrebu za oko 75k barela dnevno. To je nesto vise od 10k toma nafte.

Poredjenja radi Beograd trosi oko 400k tona vode dnevno.

Previse smo malo trziste da bi se i jedan posten naftovod isplatio. Recimo naftovod Druzba dnevno prenosi oko 1.2M barela dnevno tj za dva dana prenese ono sto je potrebno Srbiji za mesec dana.

Nafta nije pitanje isplativosti vec elementarnog nacionalnog interesa i funkcionisanja drzave.

Posle devedesetih nije moguce da se to nije videlo. Sve nam je stalo 1993 zbog nedostatka nafte. I opet nista nije uradjeno.