banecare1 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 japanci beskicmenjaci, ko telad slusaju. kod nas stjuardese ne mogu da obuzdju slobodarski duh i nateraju ljude da se na bacaju za rucnim prtljagom dok avion taksira u normalnim uslovima. 4 Quote Link to comment
jms_uk Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija. 5 Quote Link to comment
Radoye Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 3 hours ago, jms_uk said: Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija. Dobro, ti si upuceniji od mene 100% ali moj je utisak da je to oduvek bio deo tih bezbednosnih instrukcija? Barem otkad ja letim intenzivnije dakle 25+ godina... 2 Quote Link to comment
Zaboravan Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Da li ima kakvih informacija kako se ovaj turboprop našao na pisti dok je airbus sletao? Čini se da ga je samo poklopio... Quote Link to comment
Shan Jan Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Ludi Japanci, pazi ti tu koncentraciju i budisticki mir dok spolja isijava vatra Quote Link to comment
Moonwalker Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) 4 hours ago, jms_uk said: Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija. To je doslo posle one evakuacije aviona od pre 7-8 godina, kad su toliko usporili evakuaciju ostalih oni sto su «spasavali» rucni prtljag i za dlaku bila izbegnuta potpuna tragedija. Edit: Mislim da je to ovo bilo. Pre 4 godine zapravo. Tacno pamtim da je posle toga pocelo eksplicitno naglasavanje da se rucni prtljag ostavlja u avionu u slucaju evakuacije. https://www.insider.com/russian-plane-crash-aeroflot-passengers-luggage-evacuation-2019-5?amp Edited January 3 by Moonwalker Quote Link to comment
Shan Jan Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Ma treba da uvedu kazne i to zatvorske za te stvari. Quote Link to comment
Roger Sanchez Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Tolko o 90 japanskih sekundi.... Jesu li ovi skamenjeni spasili i kabinsku prtljagu pa se mogu smijati pokornoj stoci? Uglavnom, slava i čast Airbusu 3 1 Quote Link to comment
bags Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Nisuvise ni Japanci ko iz Tesne koze ... Na drugoj strani Boeing trazi da se olabave neka sigurnosna pravila da bi Max 7 poleteo: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boeing-wants-faa-to-exempt-max-7-from-safety-rules-to-get-it-in-the-air/ BTW. Za max 8 i Max 9 je vec odobreno. 4 Quote Link to comment
jms_uk Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 Kad pomenu Max 9 i video snimak 1 2 Quote Link to comment
Roger Sanchez Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 (edited) Ovaj put slučajno nisu ubili nikoga, ali će nastaviti pokušavati, zašto stati na 346 ubojstava ako su ti prošla nekažnjeno? AA prizemljili svojih 65 komada, neka, drugi put kupujte pametnije Edited January 6 by Roger Sanchez 3 1 Quote Link to comment
vememah Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 (edited) Edited January 6 by vememah 2 Quote Link to comment
vememah Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 (edited) Quote Alaska 737 Max 9 that lost deactivated exit had recent pressurization issues Preliminary information about the accident remains scarce, though two people familiar with the aircraft tell The Air Current that the aircraft in question, N704AL, had presented spurious indications of pressurization issues during two instances on January 4. The first intermittent warning light appeared during taxi-in following a previous flight, which prompted the airline to remove the aircraft from extended range operations (ETOPS) per maintenance rules. The light appeared again later the same day in flight, the people said. https://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/alaska-737-max-9-that-lost-deactivated-exit-had-recent-pressurization-issues/ Quote The rear mid-cabin exit door assembly separated from an Alaska Airlines 737-9 MAX minutes after take off from Portland on 5 January. The aircraft, registration N704AL, departed Portland (PDX) bound for Ontario, CA (ONT) at 17:06 local time (01:06 UTC +1). The aircraft reached a maximum altitude of 16,325 feet AMSL. It diverted safely back to Portland, landing at 17:26, reaching the gate at 17:30. The flight was carrying 171 passengers and six crew. On the 737-9 MAX, Boeing includes a rear cabin exit door aft of the wings, but before the rear exit door. This is activated in dense seating configurations to meet evacuation requirements. The doors are not activated on Alaska Airlines aircraft and are permanently “plugged.” https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/alaska-airlines-737-9-max-exit-door-separates-in-flight/ Edited January 6 by vememah Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.