January 3, 20241 yr japanci beskicmenjaci, ko telad slusaju. kod nas stjuardese ne mogu da obuzdju slobodarski duh i nateraju ljude da se na bacaju za rucnim prtljagom dok avion taksira u normalnim uslovima.
January 3, 20241 yr Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija.
January 3, 20241 yr 3 hours ago, jms_uk said: Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija. Dobro, ti si upuceniji od mene 100% ali moj je utisak da je to oduvek bio deo tih bezbednosnih instrukcija? Barem otkad ja letim intenzivnije dakle 25+ godina...
January 3, 20241 yr Da li ima kakvih informacija kako se ovaj turboprop našao na pisti dok je airbus sletao? Čini se da ga je samo poklopio...
January 3, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, jms_uk said: Primecujem poslednjih godina da safety announcement ukljucuje i ‘ostavite prtljag u slucaju evakuacije’ kod vise kompanija. To je doslo posle one evakuacije aviona od pre 7-8 godina, kad su toliko usporili evakuaciju ostalih oni sto su «spasavali» rucni prtljag i za dlaku bila izbegnuta potpuna tragedija. Edit: Mislim da je to ovo bilo. Pre 4 godine zapravo. Tacno pamtim da je posle toga pocelo eksplicitno naglasavanje da se rucni prtljag ostavlja u avionu u slucaju evakuacije. https://www.insider.com/russian-plane-crash-aeroflot-passengers-luggage-evacuation-2019-5?amp Edited January 3, 20241 yr by Moonwalker
January 5, 20241 yr Tolko o 90 japanskih sekundi.... Jesu li ovi skamenjeni spasili i kabinsku prtljagu pa se mogu smijati pokornoj stoci? Uglavnom, slava i čast Airbusu
January 5, 20241 yr Nisuvise ni Japanci ko iz Tesne koze ... Na drugoj strani Boeing trazi da se olabave neka sigurnosna pravila da bi Max 7 poleteo: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boeing-wants-faa-to-exempt-max-7-from-safety-rules-to-get-it-in-the-air/ BTW. Za max 8 i Max 9 je vec odobreno.
January 6, 20241 yr Ovaj put slučajno nisu ubili nikoga, ali će nastaviti pokušavati, zašto stati na 346 ubojstava ako su ti prošla nekažnjeno? AA prizemljili svojih 65 komada, neka, drugi put kupujte pametnije Edited January 6, 20241 yr by Roger Sanchez
January 6, 20241 yr Quote Alaska 737 Max 9 that lost deactivated exit had recent pressurization issues Preliminary information about the accident remains scarce, though two people familiar with the aircraft tell The Air Current that the aircraft in question, N704AL, had presented spurious indications of pressurization issues during two instances on January 4. The first intermittent warning light appeared during taxi-in following a previous flight, which prompted the airline to remove the aircraft from extended range operations (ETOPS) per maintenance rules. The light appeared again later the same day in flight, the people said. https://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/alaska-737-max-9-that-lost-deactivated-exit-had-recent-pressurization-issues/ Quote The rear mid-cabin exit door assembly separated from an Alaska Airlines 737-9 MAX minutes after take off from Portland on 5 January. The aircraft, registration N704AL, departed Portland (PDX) bound for Ontario, CA (ONT) at 17:06 local time (01:06 UTC +1). The aircraft reached a maximum altitude of 16,325 feet AMSL. It diverted safely back to Portland, landing at 17:26, reaching the gate at 17:30. The flight was carrying 171 passengers and six crew. On the 737-9 MAX, Boeing includes a rear cabin exit door aft of the wings, but before the rear exit door. This is activated in dense seating configurations to meet evacuation requirements. The doors are not activated on Alaska Airlines aircraft and are permanently “plugged.” https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/alaska-airlines-737-9-max-exit-door-separates-in-flight/ Edited January 6, 20241 yr by vememah
Create an account or sign in to comment