iDemo Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, Gojko & Stojko said: a kad bi organizovao cloud seeding prijatno bi me iznenadio Dzoni je pobozan al' je i proaktivan: Snowy Mountains Cloud Seeding Act 2004 No 19 A ja sam bio proaktivan (zapoceo PhD na tu temu) al' ujedno i lenj (nikad jos ga nisam zavrsio)...
Gojko & Stojko Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, iDemo said: Dzoni je pobozan al' je i proaktivan: Snowy Mountains Cloud Seeding Act 2004 No 19 A ja sam bio proaktivan (zapoceo PhD na tu temu) al' ujedno i lenj (nikad jos ga nisam zavrsio)... Pa nije ti to Džoni, taj zakon nije savezni nego naš (NSW), a 2004. je premijer još uvek bio Bob Kar, em je laburista em nije religiozan, sve se slaže. Ja bi' sad pao sa stolice kad bi mi rekao da je Bob Kar pozivao na molitvu za kišu. SaE
iDemo Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Gojko & Stojko said: Pa nije ti to Džoni, taj zakon nije savezni nego naš (NSW), a 2004. je premijer još uvek bio Bob Kar, em je laburista em nije religiozan, sve se slaže. Ja bi' sad pao sa stolice kad bi mi rekao da je Bob Kar pozivao na molitvu za kišu. SaE To je bilo blagosloveno sa svih strana jer je tada firma jos bila u vlasnistvu NSW/VIC & Comm. Koliko se secam desavanja 'na zemlji' - najvece smo probleme imali sa NSW gov.
Weenie Pooh Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 Prvo DNC izbaci iz platforme ukidanje fossil fuel subsidies... ... a onda Biden campaign obznani da nema problema, Sleepy je još uvek načelno za ukidanje naftaških subvencija... worldwide. Jebe lud dementnog.
Sludge Factory Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 Realno, verovatno je i nebitno i sta tu pise i sta on kaze, ako treba svirace DNC u fosilnu sviralu.
ObiW Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 13 hours ago, mustang said: ja nisam republikanac, ne znam koliko puta to moram da ponovim. cak sam se prijavila kao independent If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, then it is a duck. 1
mustang Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, ObiW said: If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, then it is a duck. sad pricas kao republikanac ako kazem da sam drvo, drvo sam
mustang Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, precog said: bukva, dodali bi neki. za tebe poison ivy Edited August 20, 2020 by mustang
ObiW Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 2 hours ago, mustang said: sad pricas kao republikanac ako kazem da sam drvo, drvo sam E ovo je vec unique snowflake territory.
mustang Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 2 hours ago, ObiW said: E ovo je vec unique snowflake territory.
Roger Sanchez Posted August 20, 2020 Posted August 20, 2020 Quote If you want to know why a woman’s right to choose is overwhelmingly popular yet teetering on the brink of collapse, why the right to vote is being suppressed, why people will be forced to risk their lives to vote during a pandemic this fall, or why our children will be shot at whenever it’s “safe” enough to open schools again, behold the ongoing failure of the Democratic Party to make the courts matter to their own voters. Last night, ahead of the nomination of Kamala Harris, the first woman of color on a major party ticket, the Democrats tackled four issues that are of critical importance to young voters in the upcoming election: gun reform, climate change, immigration, and women’s rights. On paper, it’s nearly impossible to talk seriously about any one of those issues without acknowledging the critical role the courts have to play, much less all of them. But, somehow, the Democrats found a way to ignore the 5-4 elephant in the room. There is no gun regulation or weapons ban that survives the Republican Supreme Court. None. To talk about an assault weapons ban, as Democrats did last night, without talking about the five pro-gun absolutists currently patrolling the Supreme Court is to talk about flying without acknowledging the limitations imposed by gravity. There is no climate legislation that survives what can be called the most “pro-business” Supreme Court in American history. None. And while we’re here, it’s worth mentioning that there’s no federal program that addresses police brutality, no expansion of health care, and no voting rights protection that survives this court either. I’m not making this up: The five conservatives on the Supreme Court have struck down legislation regarding each of these issues, or refused to defend this kind of legislation when lower courts have struck down the laws, over and over again.
ObiW Posted August 21, 2020 Posted August 21, 2020 Sad kad vam je propala šema sa Kanje Westom koji je pobegao glavom bez obzira u planine, dobar je i bilo koji random crnac. Slutim da će sutra na Fox News.
Recommended Posts