Нетфликс

[Willow]

Tabela raspoloživih sadržaja na Netflixu u individualnim zemljama, u odnosu na Netflix US

United States: Basic plan cost: 7.99 USD; # of TV shows: 1157; # of Movies: 4593; % of US TV library: 100.00%; % of US Movie library: 100.00%.
Serbia:            Basic plan cost: 7.99 EUR; # of TV shows:   328; # of Movies:  1439; % of US TV library:   28.35%; % of US Movie library:   31.33%.

Edited January 13, 2016 by Willow

[vememah]

Dosta bolje stojimo od drugih ex-Yu republika.

[bradilko]

to je ostecenost nasa.ponos.likovanje.sreca da i uplaseni,terorisani od vlasti raznoraznih, obicni i osrednji ljudi mozemo krasti,zajebati nekog,ciju,nsa,fbi,diznija,virdjin,hbo..

ovako unesreceni zalimo ove sto placaju pesmu o,99$.superiorni.tuzni.nije kinta u pitanju vec eto tako...

[Прслин]

Macedonia 200 560 17.29% 12.19%

 

Croatia 202 558 17.46% 12.15%

 

Slovenia 204 555 17.63% 12.08%

 

Bosnia and Herzegovina 170 549 14.69% 11.95%

 

Albania 33 200 2.85% 4.35%

 

Србин победијо. :)

[Radoye]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/cogeco-netflix-regulation-1.3403541

[garcia]

Netflix announces crackdown on VPN users

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jan/15/netflix-announces-crackdown-on-vpn-users

[James Marshall]

<_<

[kud u maglu Simoviću]

http://www.buzzfeed.com/nicolenguyen/reparo-netflix?utm_term=.aqVY2vX1w&crlt.pid=camp.ik7KqRsBpsJO#.pxeDVbmjw

17 stvari koje svaki korisnik netflixa treba da zna

[bigvlada]

WHY NETFLIX VPN ‘PIRATES’ (SHOULDN’T) TERRIFY HOLLYWOOD

• BY ERNESTO
•  
• ON  JANUARY 16, 2016
• C: 105

OPINION

 

This week Netflix announced that it would ramp up its crackdown on VPN and proxy pirates. The decision is a response to increased demands from major Hollywood players, but is this fear of VPN pirates justified?

With the launch of legal streaming services such as Netflix, movie and TV fans have less reason to turn to pirate sites. At the same time, however, these legal options present new copyright-related problems and threats.

Traditionally the movie industry has relied on geographical licensing deals through which movie and TV-show rights are sold to separate parties in various countries.

Ten years ago this model wasn’t causing any issues. But now that the Internet has made entertainment more instant and global, the public is beginning to complain.

Why do Netflix users in Andorra, Bolivia and the Cook Islands have access to Better Call Saul, while Americans don’t? Similarly, why can Danish people watch American Sniper while it’s pretty much unavailable in the rest of the world?

Most Netflix users don’t understand.

This frustration is driving people to circumvent geographical restrictions by using VPNs and proxy services. With help from handy tools such as the “unofficial Netflix online Global Search” every Netflix subscriber can easily access these hidden treasures.

There are even specialized applications that do the same, giving people a browsable library of all Netflix titles with built-in proxies.

 

unofficial Netflix online Global Search

 

 

Netflix’s announcement to ramp up its crackdown on VPN and proxy pirates comes a week after Netflix expanded its reach by more than 130 countries. This obviously isn’t a coincidence, as the two are directly linked.

While Netflix has always been contractually obliged to take measures against unblocking efforts, its near worldwide expansion makes it a higher priority.

Targeting VPN and proxy “pirates” has been high on the Hollywood agenda for several years already. For example, in 2014 Sony Pictures conducted research to identify the IP-ranges of various VPNs and proxies.

It turned out that most were not, and these results were shared with Netflix and other streaming services so they could take action and expand their blocklists where needed.

The question is, however, whether this repressive approach will be effective.

In fact, the announced measures may cause some people to give up their subscriptions and return to their old piracy habits, which should worry both Netflix and the movie studios. The true solution lies somewhere else.

While it’s easier said than done the film industry should move away from its complicated licensing schemes and windowed releases, much like the music industry has. This is a change Netflix backs according to recent statements.

According to Netflix the ‘VPN pirates’ are willing to pay, they just can’t get what they want through their local Netflix.

Speaking out on the controversial VPN use, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said that the problem can be fixed if the industry starts to offer the same content globally, without artificial barriers.

“The basic solution is for Netflix to get global and have its content be the same all around the world so there’s no incentive to [use a VPN]. Then we can work on the more important part which is piracy,” Hastings said.

For now Netflix can do little else than comply with the pressure from Hollywood, but as soon as they roll out broad VPN blockades it’s going to cause problems.

Many people use VPN services to protect their privacy, not to fool Netflix, and when they are locked out of their accounts there’s bound to be some uproar. At the same time it will trigger a new cat-and-mouse game where “unblocking” services will try to bypass Netflix’s blocks against them, and so on.

It’s hard to see any winners in this game, except perhaps from the Hollywood insiders who lack a long-term vision.

https://torrentfreak.com/why-netflix-vpn-pirates-shouldnt-terrify-hollywood-160116/

 

[Singer]

sabskrajb

 

 

edit. jel mogu ja da teram sad onaj Netflix što mi je default došao uz Playstation 3?

Edited January 21, 2016 by Singer

[Прслин]

Ако си прикопчан на нет ваљда може. Четворка га тера like a charm.

[renne]

Može naravno

[Radoye]

“The basic solution is for Netflix to get global and have its content be the same all around the world so there’s no incentive to [use a VPN]. Then we can work on the more important part which is piracy,” Hastings said.

 

Ideja da svima bude dostupno sve bez obzira na geografsku lokaciju je na papiru dobra, cak odlicna, no nazalost u praksi bi se ovo najverovatnije svelo na to da svima bude dostupno jednako, tojest da sve ono sto je danas nedostupno negde postane nedostupno svuda. Pa bi takav biznis model vrlo brzo propao jer bi izbor bio poprilicno siromasan, i ljudi bi se opet okrenuli pirateriji.

[Прслин]

Напротив. У пракси ће да иде ка престанку продавања права на Нетфликсове серије и филмове локалним телевизијама, као и нешто другачији систем откупа права за емитовање туђих серија и филмова на Нетфликсу. Вероватно ће бити више временских ограничења, где се неки програм прода на неколико недеља.

 

Временом ће се издвојити два-три велика играча, уз Нетфликс је Амазон најбољи кандидат. Јутјуб ће давати садржај бесплатно уз рекламе, ови без реклама уз претплату. Локалци попут пикбокса ће бити откупљени ако имају среће или прегажени.

[Radoye]

OK to za Netfliksovu produkciju, ali sta cemo sa ostalim sadrzajima? Da li ce MGM ili Soni imati interes da svoje produkte distribuiraju globalno iskljucivo preko Netfliksa, ili ce i dalje zeleti da igraju na kartu ekskluziviteta na pojedinacnim trzistima i tako maksimizuju profite? Koliko ce to dodatno da kosta Netfliks da bi oni postali taj ekskluzivni globalni distributer za sve, i na koji nacin ce se to odraziti na cenu koju ce krajnji korisnici morati da plate?

 

Sustinski problem ovde je to sto se internetu pokusavaju nametnuti nacionalna zakonodavstva. Internet je po svojoj prirodi ekstrateritorijalan i jako je tesko kontrolisati ko cemu odakle pristupa, tojest gde tacno se nalazi sadrzaj kome se pristupa, i ko je tu za sta nadlezan. Entiteti poput Netfliksa, Gugla, Fejsbuka, Ibeja, Amazona i ostalih su globalni fenomeni i tako se moraju i tretirati, no to se kosi sa interesima vec izgradjenih lokalnim monopola u pojedinim jurisdikcijama. Tu onda dolazimo do pokusaja da se pristup odredjenim sadrzajima blokira (od relativno benignih sistema geoblokiranja odredjenih sadrzaja do ekstremnih primera poput kineskog Zlatnog Stita).

 

I onda opet dolazimo do vecite jednacine udobnost vs cena. Ljudi bi voleli da imaju pristup sadrzaju, sto vise to bolje, i da ne moraju da se previse cimaju oko toga, i za to su spremni da plate (kako ko i koliko). Ako im se pruzi pristup ogranicenom broju sadrzaja uz povojnu cenu, trazice nacin da dodju do svega i imacemo pirateriju. Ako im se pruzi pristup svemu, ali po znacajno uvecanoj ceni, mnogi ce verovatno opet odluciti da im se vise isplati da se iscimaju sa piraterijom. Dakle, jedino resenje je pristup svemu za male pare - ali to zahteva drasticnu promenu biznis modela - ne Netfliksovog, koji je ovde samo kanal kojim se sadrzaj distribuira, nego velikih igrqaca poput holivudskih produkcijskih kuca i tradicionalnih medijskih mreza. Tu se moze ocekivati ogroman otpor i lobiranje kod zakonodavaca da se ocuva status kvo.

 

Stvar dodatno komplikuju i situacije gde medijske kuce cesto imaju monopol i na telekomunikacije (mobilna telefonija, kablovska TV, internet) tako objedinjujuci produkciju i distribuciju, sto im sve jos dodatno otvara mogucnost da odlucuju o tome cemu tacno moze a cemu ne moze da se pristupi (i kojom tacno brzinom da mu se pristupi) i nezavisno od zvanicnog restriktivnog zakonodavstva (blokiranje BT i VPN sajtova itd).