Sirija

[Gandalf]

5 hours ago, Budja said:

Lukas:

That is why we need solid micro-foundations of macroeconomics...

mi lajk dis.

Military force without diplomacy is pointless and diplomacy not backed by military force is mere posturing. - George C. Marshall

in order to evaluate public policy interventions.

Repeat after me: the answer to any question in economics is, it depends. - Dani Rodrik

Edited April 21, 2018 by Gandalf

[Budja]

1 hour ago, Gandalf said:

 

Repeat after me: the answer to any question in economics is, it depends. - Dani Rodrik

 

Nista bez konteksta:

 

“The correct answer to almost any question in economics is: it depends. Different models, each equally respectable provide different answers. Models do more than warn us that results could go either way. They are useful because they tell us precisely what the likely outcomes depend on.”

 

"The value of models resides in being able to isolate and identify specific causal mechanism, one at a time. These mechanisms operate in the real world alongside many others that obfuscate their workings is a complication faced by all who attempt scientific explanations. Economic models may even have an advantage here. Contingency—dependence on specific postulated conditions—is built into them"

 

 

[Gandalf]

2 minutes ago, Budja said:

“The correct answer to almost any question in economics is: it depends. Different models, each equally respectable provide different answers. Models do more than warn us that results could go either way. They are useful because they tell us precisely what the likely outcomes depend on.”

 

"The value of models resides in being able to isolate and identify specific causal mechanism, one at a time. These mechanisms operate in the real world alongside many others that obfuscate their workings is a complication faced by all who attempt scientific explanations. Economic models may even have an advantage here. Contingency—dependence on specific postulated conditions—is built into them"

 

But that doesn't mean anything goes in economics. We economists know what "it" depends on. - Dani Rodrik

 

All models are wrong, some are useful. - George Box

[Eraserhead]

Inace izgla da Sarah Abdallah ni ne postoji kao osoba i da je ceo nalog propagandna masinerija terorista iz Hezbolaha. 

 

https://medium.com/@Brian_Whit/syria-propaganda-and-the-mysterious-sarah-abdallah-a-hizbullah-connection-bd6308975f6e

 

 

[3opge]

 

20 minutes ago, Gandalf said:

 

But that doesn't mean anything goes in economics. We economists know what "it" depends on. - Dani Rodrik

 

All models are wrong, some are useful. - George Box

 

od tolike mudrosti dodje coveku da se usere od milote.

[Anduril]

Zanimljivo kako se uvek CNN uzima kao neka reprezentacija zapadnih medija, a radi se o veoma ogranicenom tabloidnom kanalu. 

Isti propagandni mehanizam kao kada se uzme neka ultra-desnicarska stranka pa predstavlja kao dominantna reprezentacija demokratije. 

Sa druge strane, kada desnicarsko-tajkunska ideologija zaista dominira drzavom, drzavnim medijima i gotovo svakim aspektom zivota u velicini od 70%, to je onda kao slobodni izbor ljudi koji iz tradicionalnih ili kulturoloskih razloga preferiraju cvrstu ruku. Cvrstu ruku kakva je postojala u svakoj demokratiji pre revolucija i ratova. 

[Desmond Bojčinski]

18 hours ago, mlatko said:

Jel ima Izrael Nuke?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

[Weenie Pooh]

10 hours ago, Eraserhead said:

Inace izgla da Sarah Abdallah ni ne postoji kao osoba i da je ceo nalog propagandna masinerija terorista iz Hezbolaha. 

 

https://medium.com/@Brian_Whit/syria-propaganda-and-the-mysterious-sarah-abdallah-a-hizbullah-connection-bd6308975f6e

 

Jedino što je tu zanimljivo je činjenica da Guardin komotno menja metu u sred napada, pre par dana su lupa da su ruski botovi @Ian56789 i @Partisangirl, pa im se smejalo pola Tvitera. Dobro sad, ajde, recimo da su to pravi živi ljudi koji imenom, prezimenom, i likom stoje iza togašto pišu... ali ova Sarah Abdallah, e ona je sto posto bot - Abdallah zvuči kao Hezbollah, sve je jasno, šta hoćete...

 

Whitehall inače rutinski duplira statistiku Pentagona. Oni su lupili da je broj ruskih botova skočlio za 2,000% a ovi sad kažu da je za 4,000%. Verujem da bi Guardian preneo i da su rekli za osamnaest triliona procenata.

 

 

[Anduril]

Verovatno ubrajaju i one koji stalno kritikuju Zapad, cute uglavnom o Putinu ili Asadu, ali ih zato, naravno, ne podrzavaju direktno. Indirektna politicka podrska se valjda ne racuna u svetu korisnih idiota.

[Miralem]

ko sto se ne racuna ni podrska beskorisnih idiota po forumima. sve u svemu, dzabe piskaras.

[Weenie Pooh]

Pa da, ali to se onda kaže "protivljenje zapadnjačkom intervencionizmu je skočilo, o tempora, o mores" a ne "drastično skočio broj ruskih tviter-plaćenika i izmanipulisanih bednika, Putin kreće u novu ofanzivu". Pritom je gađanje izmišljenim procentima samo šlag na torti bedastoće.

Edited April 22, 2018 by Weenie Pooh

[Simon]

Ни Њемци не знају изгледа шта би и како би са Сиријом...

http://www.dw.com/en/syria-airstrikes-violated-international-law-german-parliamentary-report/a-43476594

[Eraserhead]

3 hours ago, Weenie Pooh said:

 

Jedino što je tu zanimljivo je činjenica da Guardin komotno menja metu u sred napada, pre par dana su lupa da su ruski botovi @Ian56789 i @Partisangirl, pa im se smejalo pola Tvitera. Dobro sad, ajde, recimo da su to pravi živi ljudi koji imenom, prezimenom, i likom stoje iza togašto pišu... ali ova Sarah Abdallah, e ona je sto posto bot - Abdallah zvuči kao Hezbollah, sve je jasno, šta hoćete...

 

Whitehall inače rutinski duplira statistiku Pentagona. Oni su lupili da je broj ruskih botova skočlio za 2,000% a ovi sad kažu da je za 4,000%. Verujem da bi Guardian preneo i da su rekli za osamnaest triliona procenata.

 

 

 

 

Smejalo im se pola ruskih botiva i americka nazi tviter zajednica. Inace sad vidim da partisangirl pise za infowars Alexa Jonesa. Neverovatno kako se te psihopate povezuju.

 

To je izgleda kao SNS botivi sako na globalnom nivou.

Edited April 22, 2018 by Eraserhead

[Weenie Pooh]

Ne bi trebalo da me čudi što si do peta zaronio u taj bizarni screed, to da svako ko se ne slaže sa tobom = strani plaćenik domaći izdajnik useful idiot.

[Weenie Pooh]

1 hour ago, Simon said:

Ни Њемци не знају изгледа шта би и како би са Сиријом...

http://www.dw.com/en/syria-airstrikes-violated-international-law-german-parliamentary-report/a-43476594

 

Srećom ima ko zna, evo Macron bi da se oproba u nation building biznisu.

 

“The day we’ll have finished this war against ISIS [Islamic State, IS]; if we leave definitely and totally – even from [the] political point of view – we will leave the floor to the Iranian regime, Bashar Assad and these guys and they will prepare [a] new war. They will fuel the new terrorists.”

 

“We have to build a new Syria after war,” Macron said, adding that the US role would be “very important” in this process.