Indy Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 People who believe that their government is unstable will be more likely to believe that God (or a nonhuman entity) controls the universe.True or False?Zavisi naravno na koje "people" misle. Sudeci prema iskustvu, "people" su najverovatnije studenti njihovog koledza koje su uspeli da savataju po hodnicima.
palchica Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 (edited) meni zvuci kao false. ako si verujuci, onda mislis da je i stabilna vlada od boga data, ne?da ne pominjem redneckove po amerikama.a zanimljivo mi ono dal ljudi traze autoritet il postoje oni koji su skepticni bas prema svemu. ja, recimo, verujem u nauku. ne kao u nesto sto je u kamen uklesano, ali kao u nesto sto najbolje opisuje svet. medjutim, imam koleginice koje su verujuce i ne veruju, recimo, u evoluciju, a koje imaju obicaj da mi kazu - ne mozes da verujes svemu sto ti naucnici kazu. Edited June 23, 2013 by palchica
betty Posted June 24, 2013 Author Posted June 24, 2013 zajebo me app opet :rolf:i to kauzalno-hidraulicki! mislim objasnjenje, koje daje. People who believe that their government is unstable will be more likely to believe that God (or a nonhuman entity) controls the universe. TRUE!Let's tell you why!Perhaps surprisingly, in a series of cross-cultural experiments, Kay and colleagues found that exposing participants to information that their government was unstable lead their participants to believe more strongly that God or a nonhuman entity exercised control over the universe. Exposing participants to information that indicated that the latest research demonstrated that God or a nonhuman entity could not be controlling the physical world lead participants to increase their support for their government.Kay, A. C., Shepherd, S., Blatz, C. W., Chua, S. N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). For God (or) country: The hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(5), 725-739.
Indy Posted June 29, 2013 Posted June 29, 2013 Sve je true, da vam ustedim vreme... Students who are offered a reward for producing creative work are less likely to return to that work when no reward is offered Artists tend to produce more creative work when they are not making commissioned work, as they are free from constraints and expectations Presenting teachers with financial rewards for raising test scores had no corresponding result in teacher effectiveness
ToniAdams Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 a odakle dolaze tvrdnje dana? ova poslednja mi ko da ju je sklopio polumenta generatorna pocetku su pak bile super.
betty Posted June 30, 2013 Author Posted June 30, 2013 mislim da se jedna bira nasumicno svaki dan iz pocetnog skupa od 365. starije reference mi se cine smislenije, mozda jer se neko opste teorijsko znacenje iskristalisalo do sada. a danasnjae pita da li su roditeljima pelene sopstvene dece podjednako gadne (offensive) kao tudje O:-)
ToniAdams Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 pa sto posto je odgovor negativan. neam jos djecu, al mi je svakako govno mog psa manje offensive negoli izmet tudjeg :(
betty Posted July 1, 2013 Author Posted July 1, 2013 pelene sopstvene dece su manje gadne! ladno su dali mamama da mirisu govanca. ali, ali! sakrili su govanca u kantice tako da ne moze da dodje do vizuelne identifikacije! pa su probusili rupice na vrhu, i onda su majke njuskale i rangirale. istrazivaci nude dva objasnjenja: da su se majke navikle na miris pa im je zato manje gadno (razumno objasnjenje), ili da su mogle da detektuju srodnost ('relatedness') putem mirisa (wtf objasnjenje).Case, T. I., Repacholi, B. M., & Stevenson, R. J. (2006). My baby doesn't smell as bad as yours: The plasticity of disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 357-365.
Indy Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Evo kacim ovde 1 tvrdnju dana da betty ne propusti (posto znam koliko je istrazivanja srece ispunjavaju srecom & veseljem). Dakle, istrazivaci su otkrili sta treba za srecu:three key ingredients for better wellbeing: a meaningful relationship an annual income of $100,000 a rewarding hobby Btw. tvrdnja br. 2 je da kucni ljubimci nisu od koristi za licnu srecu. This just made 1 kitten cry.
gogilly Posted October 24, 2013 Posted October 24, 2013 (edited) igra se sastoji u sledecem: postavicu tvrdnju iz psihologije koja je tacna ili netacna, a onda mozemo da diskutujemo o tome sta je od ta dva.tvrdnje ne smisljam ja, nego imam app po imenu socialk, svaki dan dobijem novu, a iduceg dana mogu da vidim odgovor, kao i kratak opis nekih studija. ne mogu da obecam apdejtovanje svaki dan, ali nekoliko puta nedeljno svakako. kvalitet pitanja i odgovora me uglavnom frustrira, a ovo je dobro mesto za ispoljavanje frusta :Ddanasnja tvrdnja je:People who are well qualified and physically attractive are less likely to be hired for a job when the interviewer is of the same-sex as them rather than the opposite sex.true or false?rekla bih pretežno.... istina Edited October 24, 2013 by gogilly
kim_philby Posted October 24, 2013 Posted October 24, 2013 Evo kacim ovde 1 tvrdnju dana da betty ne propusti (posto znam koliko je istrazivanja srece ispunjavaju srecom & veseljem). Dakle, istrazivaci su otkrili sta treba za srecu:three key ingredients for better wellbeing:a meaningful relationship an annual income of $100,000 a rewarding hobby Btw. tvrdnja br. 2 je da kucni ljubimci nisu od koristi za licnu srecu. This just made 1 kitten cry. ako radis za 100 iljada nemas vremena za hobi i vezu :(no, ja biram kintu i kucnog ljubimca.Sent from Bender's iPad using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now