Australian Open Finale

[Afterburner]

btw sa onom igrom marej bi ugazio rafu

[anantaram]

ne slazem se...ni sa cimPreveliku autonomiju novaku daju oni koji sebe zovu neutralcima. Zanimljivo. Ne radi se tu o glumatanju alergije -wtf?, losoj koncentraciji i neprofesionalizmu koji je novi biser matsa. Sve greska do greske. Novak nije u formi iz 2011. i tempira je za rg i oi. Oscilacije i losa taktika i pored toga je opet uzeo trofej. To je domaci. Da sam nadal, ne bih se radovala.

Kako se tempira forma? Kako tacno ide taj proces?ps. Da Rafa ima Noletovu igru, ne bi se onako mucio sa Marejom.

[anantaram]

Ann-Lisa Edited February 1, 2012 by anantaram

[Afterburner]

tempiranje je psihofizicki proces u kojem je svaka komponenta ponaosob dovedena u zadate okvire. ukljucujuci i taktiku. posto je tenis izuzetno naporan sport u svakom smislu, jako je tesko (kao u nekim drugim sportovima) uciniti je konstantom tokom citave sezone. primer je novak koji uprkos izvanrednim rezultatima jednostavno nije mogao da zadrzi iste performanse poslednjih par meseci jer je doslo do zasicenja i emotivnog i fizickog, a kalendar vremenski nije od pomoci.u tempiranju forme ucestvuje i priprema i adaptacija na tekuce vremenske i klimatske uslove ako je u pitanju pojedinacno takmicenje od izuzetne vaznosti i generalno sport koji podrazumeva ceste promene ovih uslova. zato imamo pikove nekih igraca samo na jednom turniru.on je ove godine dosao najranije u australiju sto govori da mu je idealan start bio izuzetno od znacaja. tempiranju svake forme daju osnovu bazicne pripreme. posto imamo velike razlike u klimatskim uslovima, one se unekoliko razlikuju od takmicenja do takmicenja, a narocito kod igraca koji imaju problem sa alergijama i radom na nekim temperaturama (ovo je zvucalo kao da pricam o masinama :))poznato je da su alergije cesto psihosomatskog porekla, uzrokovane i raznim pritiscima, stresovima (koji naravno jos mogu biti izazvani i bioloski, fizicki, hemijski...)ono sto su mnogi kod novaka tumacili kao foliranje nije nista drugo do akutni stres (decko je asmaticar plus je alergican na polen btw). Na alergijske manifestacije zalili su se i ostali igraci na ao. Stres recimo moze da prolongira dejstvo alergije i da ga ucini jacim, te da napad duze traje- to je ono sto smo gledali kada je pokazivao na grlo. Uglavnom su se ti problemi desavali u prvim satima meca kada su igraci u prilicnom grcu (tako je bilo u poslednja 3) da bi on to hendlovao i adaptirao se kako je vreme odmicalo.Jako me raduje ovaj njegov rezultat jer on takticki nije bio potpuno spreman. Ovaj mec je mogao i trebalo je da traje znatno krace da je izlazio na mrezu u zilion trenutaka kada je bio nesvestan da je napravio prilazni udarac iz bukvara. on je uporno ostajao na liniji i prolongirao rat sa baseline-a i samo njegova apsolutno superiornost u takvoj igri i naravno strasna zelja, smirenost i fokus na samom kraju doveli su do trijumfa. zato je on tako voljen igrac, jer se na terenu vidi da se muci, da prezivljava ljudske strahove i dvojbe, ima svega i gestikulacije i ironije i emocija, ali reci da je novak fejker, licno meni nikad nije padalo na pamet. i kada takav neko trijumfuje, pored ociglednih i opipljivih prepreka- zdravlja, umora i cega sve ne, koliko god delovao kao masina (fed i rafa vec imaju nadimak -kiborzi), on je najhumanoidnija masina na turu.sada je rekao da ce da napravi jako veliku pauzu gde nece videti reket neko vreme. znaci krece iznova tempiranje i adaptacija, opipao je puls svojim protivnicima na prvom turniru na kojem je ove godine ucestvovao, video gde je i sta mora da koriguje, sa tim informacijama sada krece jos podrobniji rad. nadam se ponajvise takticki. ostalu rutinu mislim da nema potrebe da menja, iz prilozenog.

[gone fishing]

djokerova dominacija nad rafaborgom na bodovom skeneruIs Nole in Rafa's Game? 01/30/2012 - 10:18 PM by Pete Bodo One of the ranking theories of superiority, especially in head-to-head results, generates from a fundamental disbelief that player A can and should regularly beat player B. Then, when player B whups up on player A in what some—mostly rabid fans of, and apologists for, player A—insist is an extra-athletic or meta-strategic way, player B is said to "be in player A's head." The assumption, tacit though it may be, is that there's no way player Rafael Nadal ought to beat Rog. . . whoops. . . no way player B ought to beat player A—all other things being equal. For it's plain as the nose on his face that compared to player B, player A clearly is one or more of the following: a) more talented; b) has a better game; c) is a better competitor; d) is a finer athletic specimen. Therefore, the only reason player B has surprised us with those wins over player A is that the winner is "in his head." He has some kind of inexplicable psychological power over player A, or player B somehow represents the authoritarian father to whom player A still feels inferior, etc. etc. You know: John McEnroe was in Bjorn Borg's head. Pete Sampras was in Andre Agassi's head, Michael Stich was in Boris Becker's head, Nadal was in Roger Federer's head, Novak Djokovic is in Rafa's head. But it's surprising how this "in his head" business is almost always just an early-stage phenomenon, and over time it becomes clear that either player B has either moved from A's brain into his game, or we never really wanted to believe, or couldn't see, that player B simply was a lot better than we thought. Or he got a lot better, unexpectedly. Then it's legitimate to wonder, was it really that player B was in player A's head, or is it just that we didn't appreciate the quality, or potential quality, of B's game. Suddenly, the idea that player B is in player A's head seems stupendously irrelevant. This was the case with in the rivalry between Federer and Nadal, and Sunday showed that it probably is the case with Nadal and Djokovic. Before the Australian Open, you could probably fly that "in his head" business by lots of people, and perhaps even Rafa and/or Nole bought into it. But you can throw it now, even if there's still a real chance that Nadal can re-tool (as he promises to do in an otherwise quiet month of February). We saw last Sunday that there are specific, clear, identifiable reasons for why Djokovic can handle Nadal just fine without having to crawl into Rafa's earhole. (For more on Djokovic's superiority, also check out my post from earlier today over ESPN.) 1. Djokovic, by virtue of his diet, his constitution, his will, whatever. . . is superior to Nadal in the fitness department. This is something that no one expected, partly because Nadal's game appears so much more physical, right down to his leaping air punches. But the signs that in his own quiet way Nole is Rafa's equal in stamina were there as early as last April, when Djokovic backed up his win over Nadal at Indian Wells in a physical, three-set win in Miami. You can revisit that match in my Bare-Knickle Tennis post of the time. While both men were shaky near the end of the battle of Melbourne, Djokovic seemed the one more able to play aggressive tennis, which suggests that he was better able to muster the energy to finish the task at hand. Both men are incredibly fit, but Djokovic's reservoir seems deeper. 2. In a comparison of backhands and how they are deployed, Nadal's looks woefully undergunned. That slice with which he buys time and/or treads water may work against lesser opponents, but it allows Djokovic to take the initiative in rallies with impunity. Nadal, to his credit, knows he needs to be more forceful and aggressive with his backhand and tried to pull it off at times; he will presumably continue working on it. But Djokovic's backhand is a fully-realized thing of beauty—and menace. 3. Court position is as critical in tennis as field position is in NFL football, and it's the easiest thing to overlook when the boys are trading topspin shots that makes it look more like they're playing with kittens than optic yellow tennis balls. Djokovic is superb at winning the court position battle—partly because he innately knows how important it is. One of the major distinguishing characteristics between a clay-court and hard-court player (although court position certainly counts on all surfaces) is this awareness of how much there is to gain by playing "inside" the court, especially if you can effectively take the ball on the rise. Nadal's early superiority on clay has hurt ability to play on or inside the baseline in the manner of a great hard-court player like Djokovic (or an Agassi or Connors). Aside: perhaps developing his game on clay in Spain has also hurt Andy Murray in this regard. 4. Djokovic's service return is a remarkable asset. Nadal put it best after the match when he told the world press: "Is something unbelievable how he (Djokovic) returns, no? His return probably is one of the best of the history. That's my opinion, no? I never played against a player who's able to return like this. Almost every time." 'Nuf said. 5. Second-serve conversion rate. In the final Down Under, Djokovic's winning percentage on first and second serves were, respectively, 68 and 63 percent, while Nadal's were 66-45. It was the most telling stat of the day, and it helps explain how Djokovic managed to allow Nadal just six break points while accumulating a whopping 20 of his own (one of the few bright spots for Nadal: He converted four of those six, while Djokovic was successful on just seven of 20). Granted, this could change; wasn't it just 18 or so months ago that Djokovic had trouble finding the box with his serve? But that was then and this is now—a now that has lasted for over a year and five Grand Slam events. The reality is that Djokovic doesn't even need to be in Nadal's head. He's established himself successfully in Nadal's game.

[freakns]

btw sa onom igrom marej bi ugazio rafu

holly fuck... ti i ja cemo se sloziti oko necega?! ovo je znak da ce ili cuskije s neba da padaju ili da ce NJole da drzi sva cetiri GS trofeja odjednom :D nadam se potonjem, jeli. i to ne zato sto sam navijac, vec me ideja o padanju cuskija uopste ne uveseljava :Dcak se slazem i za ono sto je napisala o formi

[karambol]

meni je mats uvek mi popravi raspolozenje

Morate da shvatite finansijsku situaciju Eurosporta, ljudi nemaju puno love, prenose uglavnom alternativne sportove gde su TV prava mala.Nisu imali para da dovedu Mekinroa, pa ajd' može i Mats :P

[Budja]

Mats Wilander je tačno objasnio Đovaka u najnovijem napisu u New York Timesu.U osnovi tačno i izuzetno pozitivna ocena... tako da, pravda za Matsa.

Cekaj, ili telgrafise ili je glumac. Ne moze oba.Meni se ovo drugo cini istinitije.

[Budja]

Mislim da je iz gornjeg NYT citata prilično jasno našta je mislio Mats kad je rekao da bi valjalo da je Đovak više kao Nadal. ;) Mora da ste veliki navijači ako vam ne smeta to što u odsudnim momentima kod Đovaka proradi alergija. Što je doduše veliki napredak u odnosu na drama-queen scene od pre par godina. Ide u dobrom pravcu. Samo da bude malo više kao Nadal. :D

Indy, svi komentatori koje sam citao isticu jaku glavu Novaka kao novitet - dobiti Rafu u 5 setova je teze nego u 4.I onda se nadje Vilander koji jedini tvrdi suprotno.

[bradilko]

@afterburnerto sam i ja primetio.mislim na to kad kazu njole je fejker.svako normalan vidi da se rastavlja sa dusom u tim trenucima.zamuti mu se pogled i govor tela sve govori. i onda neki seronja od tenisera kaze jaooj a kako onda opali za 5 minuta onakvu paralelu. meni se to desavalo. utakmica ,ocu da umrem a posle par minuta kidam. sad se to svelo da igram basket cuku vremena i ne mogu vise i dodjem kuci i vratim se nazad ka nov. ali njole ima neke vrhunske tipove preko puta i drzi se i posle im se ... mame. a jos nisam znao za te alergije i astmu.ne da maca da kuckam

[kralj]

Indy, svi komentatori koje sam citao isticu jaku glavu Novaka kao novitet - dobiti Rafu u 5 setova je teze nego u 4.I onda se nadje Vilander koji jedini tvrdi suprotno.

Glava u tenisu je generalno precenjena stvar. Cak laici cinjenicu da se radi o individualnom sportu stavljaju u prilog tome.Ispade da teniski potez nosi vecu tezinu od fudbalskog.

[Moća]

Glava u tenisu je generalno precenjena stvar. Cak laici cinjenicu da se radi o individualnom sportu stavljaju u prilog tome.Ispade da teniski potez nosi vecu tezinu od fudbalskog.

:isuse:Obrisi ovo pre nego sto neko vidi i pravi se da nikad nisi ni napisao.

[bergasa19]

+1000

[kralj]

:isuse:Obrisi ovo pre nego sto neko vidi i pravi se da nikad nisi ni napisao.

Moco, glava je i kod tebe precenjena stvar... Inace ima vrednost dupeta.. Fala na savetodavnostima.Kada bilo koji momenat u tenisu uporedis sa, recimo penalom na svetskom prvenstvu u fudbalu... Ma neces ti to razumeti.

[Moća]

Kralju pravi si kralj!Ko sutira penal? Uvek isti igrac u tome je razlika care u kolektivnom sportu uvek imas nekog ko ima najjacu psihu i ko sutira taj penal a ne daju tamo nekom levom beku. U tenisu kao individualnom sportu sam si i sve od tebe zavisi. Primera imas mnogo a jedan ti je Marej koji ima kvalitet slican Djokovicu i Nadalu ali nije osvoji nista bas zbog te precenjene glave.

Edited February 2, 2012 by Moća