3 minutes ago, Tutankamon said:

Zeznuo si se za topik

NIsam, namerno sam buduci da se otkako je pocelo sranje sa Iranom i s tim povezana nestasica nafte, kolona^tm senka tankera krece sa ruskog Baltika na zapad. Neki idu oko Britanije, neki Kanalom, Britanci ih ponajvise prate i trabunjaju o penjanu na njih...

Sve je to idimidodji mi da ovo sa estonskim glavnim mornarom mozda, ali samo mozda nije znak da polako dolazi iz dupeta u glavu.

Pri cemu je karakteristicno da su se pičke politčke sklonile u stranu i ovakve zdravorazumske^tm izjave prepustaju vojnicima.

Moguce je cak, verovatno, da Rusi suptilno, mada suptilnog danas u svetu nema ni u tragovima, pomalo navrcu vodu na slobodu plovidbe koja im je, cinjenica, uskracena maltetiranjem tankera: Kanal i Hormuz imaju isti status sto se tice neometane, slobodne plovidbe za sve bez razlike i bez obzira na zastavu, dakle status medjunarodnih voda i ne dozvoljavajuci, ometajuci plovidbu zaista nepotrebno zatezu inace do pucanja zategnuto...

Jebemliga...

54 minutes ago, Budja said:

Ono, kad ratni zlocinac ide na Happy TV kod Milomira.

A na mapi Izrael s anektiranom Zapadnom obalom i Golanskom visoravni.

Edited April 11Apr 11 by vememah

Izrael okružen neprijateljima. Na ogromnih 7% svoje granice koju treba da brani nemoćna nuklearna sila. Da visi kao Musolini ne bi bilo dovoljno

Ta mapa nikako ne izgleda 'dobro', kako god okrenes, nece se promeniti

I šta sad, propali pregovori s Iranom jer nisu našli zajednički jezik u dve ili tri tačke razgovora. A šta ono beše, ah da, odustajanje od razvoja raketa, obogaćivanja i sponzorisanje programskih milicija diljem regiona.

Ni zapomaganje mog omiljenog pape nije pomoglo....

😱

Bez obzira, narandžasti ovo beleži kao još jednu pobedu.

Ćuti bre već jednom

understanding.” Adding: “We’ll see if the Iranians accept.”

Here’s more from Vance:

🔹 Talks lasted 21 hours with what he described as “substantive discussions” with Iran

🔹 No agreement reached, which Vance framed as “bad news for Iran much more than… the United States”

🔹 U.S. presented clear red lines and terms, saying Iran “chose not to accept” them

🔹 Did not detail the demands, but suggested core disagreement is US wants a firm, long-term commitment from Iran not to pursue a nuclear weapon or the capability to rapidly build one

🔹 Vance claimed Iran’s previous enrichment facilities have been destroyed, but said the issue is now political will, not capability

🔹 Confirmed talks covered frozen assets and broader issues, but no breakthroughs were achieved

🔹 Said the U.S. was “flexible” and negotiating in good faith, while maintaining its core conditions

🔹 U.S. officials were in constant contact with Trump and the national security team throughout the negotiations

🔹 Washington “leaves here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding, that is our final and best offer. We’ll see if the Iranians accept,” Vance said.

https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/2043146825973068198

“Iran has put forward reasonable initiatives and proposals in the negotiations. The ball is in America’s court to look at the issues realistically,” the informed source told the Tasnim news agency.

The source said the US had miscalculations in the negotiations, just as it had done in war, and warned that nothing would change in the Strait of Hormuz “until the United States agrees to a reasonable agreement”.

“Iran is no hurry,” the source reiterated.

https://tasnimnews.ir/en/news/2026/04/12/3563630/ball-in-us-court-iran-in-no-hurry-in-negotiations-source-says

In one of the most intense rounds of diplomacy between Tehran and Washington, 21 hours of negotiations in Islamabad concluded without an agreement, underscoring deep divisions and what Iranian sources describe as maximalist demands from the United States.

According to information, the Iranian delegation was confronted with a set of new and contentious conditions raised by the U.S., including issues related to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, and several other areas. A source close to the negotiating team stated that these demands were viewed as excessive and ultimately rejected by Tehran, adding:

“The Americans sought in negotiations what they failed to achieve through war.”

The talks, held in the aftermath of a 40-day military conflict and during a fragile ceasefire, took place in an atmosphere of deep mistrust. Despite this, the Iranian side reportedly put forward multiple initiatives and proposals in an effort to move the process forward. However, according to informed sources, a lack of flexibility from the U.S. side prevented any meaningful progress.

A source familiar with the discussions also claimed that the American delegation appeared to be looking for a pretext to leave the negotiating table. Some assessments suggest that Washington’s primary motivation may have been to repair its international standing rather than to reach a substantive agreement.

https://wanaen.com/no-deal-after-21-hours-of-iran-u-s-talks/

https://x.com/spectatorindex/status/2042898166832636385

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116389798405349626

Linkovani članak:
https://justthenews.com/government/security/trump-card-president-holds-if-iran-wont-bend-naval-blockade

Ne razumem kako to funkcioniše ako na primer kineski tanker sa kineskom zastavom krene tuda? Zaustaviće ga?

Ameri bi blokirali iranski izvoz, a teško da će Iranci puštati kineske tankere sa tuđom naftom ako njihova nafta i gas ne mogu da prođu.

Edited April 12Apr 12 by vememah

https://x.com/cetiner_cetin/status/2043034609445728627

2 hours ago, Marcus Wulffings said:

Bez obzira, narandžasti ovo beleži kao još jednu pobedu.

Foreign Affairs trijumfalan: Tehničko-taktički smo nadigrali protivnika, za nauk drugima...

15 minutes ago, vememah said:

Ameri bi blokirali iranski izvoz, a teško da će Iranci puštati kineske tankere sa tuđom naftom ako njihova nafta i gas ne mogu da prođu.

Zašto tuđom? Zar nije Kina najveći uvoznik iranske nafte? Jedini način je da im USA skroz izlupa rafinerije i luke, ali isto bi dobili i ovi preko puta