NevenMan Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 On 15.6.2021. at 16:44, Radoye said: jebene Qanon budale, postaje patoloski bolesno.
Micko8 Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 (edited) Mogao je da je matira sa kontra pitanjima , kako se ona oseca dok se afro amerikanci masovno ubijaju izmedju sebe svakog dana u Cikagu ,Atlanti,Baltimoru i u drugim gradovima sirom SAD-a i zasto ne protestvuje u svojoj drzavi , kako bi se zaustavilo to masovno krvoprolice , umesto sto dangubi postavljauci narucena pitanja o unutrasnjim problemima druge zemlje , koji ne uticu na njenu svakodnevnicu Edited June 17, 2021 by Micko8
ObiW Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 A lack of easy access to the vaccine is likely responsible for some current hesitancy, according to Majumder. Though the vaccine is free, factors other than price can get in the way for some. “These are people who won't be able to take time off either to get the vaccine or recover from any side effects they may incur,” Majumder said. But a large group of holdouts, she said, are likely skeptics of the Covid vaccine. Polling by the Kaiser Family Foundation suggests that about 13% of Americans plan to avoid the vaccine no matter what, while another 12% say they are waiting before making a decision and 7% will get vaccinated only if required. We need to disentangle what percentage of these under-vaccinated pockets are due to skepticism and true hesitancy and what percentage is really due to access still being an issue,” she said. I jedan interesantan podatak koji potvrdjuje ono što smo znali: Bloomberg’s analysis revealed pockets where less than 25% of the population were vaccinated, the average population was 64,000 compared to 1.29 million in more vaccinated areas. The median annual income in these places was $48,600 compared to $66,100 in vaccinated areas. And of those in less vaccinated areas, 72.1% voting in the last presidential election cast their ballots for Trump.
đorđe geprat Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 Quote Mogao je da je matira sa kontra pitanjima , kako se ona oseca dok se afro amerikanci masovno ubijaju izmedju sebe svakog dana u Cikagu ,Atlanti,Baltimoru i u drugim gradovima sirom SAD-a i zasto ne protestvuje u svojoj drzavi , kako bi se zaustavilo to masovno krvoprolice , umesto sto dangubi postavljauci narucena pitanja o unutrasnjim problemima druge zemlje , koji ne uticu na njenu svakodnevnicu kad mu izraelci nisu savetnici k'o Ovom našem na pitanja se odgovara ili je "no comment"
Lezilebovich Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 Quote Vlasti američke savezne države Teksas usvojile su zakon kojim se dozvoljava nošenje oružja na javnim mestima, čak i bez dozvole. To je poslednja mera u nizu odluka o proširenju prava na nošenje oružja u američkim državama u kojima su republikanci na vlasti. Zakon, koji su u maju usvojili Senat i Predstavnički dom kojim dominiraju republikanci u Teksasu, dozvoljava svima starijim od 21 godinu i nije im zabranjeno posedovanje oružja, da ga javno nose bez dozvole. Taj zakon će stupiti na snagu 1. septembra. Odlična ideja. Ne vidim uopšte šta bi moglo da krene po zlu sa još više oružja na ulicama 3
radisa Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 35 minutes ago, Lezilebovich said: Odlična ideja. Ne vidim uopšte šta bi moglo da krene po zlu sa još više oružja na ulicama Pa ovo je odlično™... I eto nas u 1864... Ni dva veka nije prošlo, a mi smo se vratili u wild wild west... jbt... 2
đorđe geprat Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 odličan primer za one ovde koji malo malo: "a kako u americi?"
papapavle Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 Samo da istaknem da je to jedna od 50 "Amerika", svaka je baždarena drugačije po većini sociopolitičkih pitanja (sad, malo ili mnogo, zavisi koje dve uzmeš da porediš). 1
Ivo Petović Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 Pa da, kao kad bi npr Norveška i Srbija bile jedna država i onda bi mi, gledajući u tu državu, komentarisali kako je ono što se dešava u Srbiji Amerika ili ono što se dešava u Norveškoj Amerika. S tim da su neke razlike između država u USA, čak i veće, nego u Evropi
ObiW Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 On 17.6.2021. at 3:19, radisa said: Pa ovo je odlično™... I eto nas u 1864 devedesetim... Ni dva veka tri decenije nije prošlo, a mi smo se vratili u wild wild west... jbt... FIFY A sad ozbiljno, vec sam pisao al cu da ponovim. Ako je verovati lokalcima, do negde 93-94 je mogao da se nosi pistolj, sakriven, bez dozvole.
radisa Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, ObiW said: FIFY A sad ozbiljno, vec sam pisao al cu da ponovim. Ako je verovati lokalcima, do negde 93-94 je mogao da se nosi pistolj, sakriven, bez dozvole. Kontam da 90ih nije bila ovakva atmosfera u društvu, i da nije bilo ovkavih polarizacija... Ili imam pogrešnu sliku o 90im u Teksasu?
ObiW Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 (edited) 43 minutes ago, radisa said: Kontam da 90ih nije bila ovakva atmosfera u društvu, i da nije bilo ovkavih polarizacija... Ili imam pogrešnu sliku o 90im u Teksasu? U Teksasu je bilo daleko gore, sto se tice licne bezbednosti. Zena koja mi je to pricala rekla je da je pocela da nosi pistolj negde 1990 ili 91 jer je u to vreme naglo porastao broj oruzanih pljacki, silovanja i ubistava. Navodno u to vreme u Teksasu nije postojala dozivotna robija i otprilike je bilo pravilo da se odsluzi 2/3 kazne pre nego sto se kriminalci puste uslovno na slobodu. Nekako se pogodilo da je pocetkom devedesetih dosta takvih pusteno na slobodu, i ljudi koji do tada nisu nosili oruzje su poceli da ga nose. Sredinom devedesetih je poostrena kaznena politika na saveznom nivou (three strikes and you're out, Bajden je za to glasao), a u Teksasu uvedena je dozivotna robija i zabranjeno je nosenje oruzja bez dozvole. Sve tri stvari su posledica veoma visoke stope kriminala pre tacno 30 godina. Three strikes and you're out i assault weapon ban su dva zakona za koje je Klintonova administracija imala podrsku i republikanaca i demokrata. Edited June 18, 2021 by ObiW 1 1
radisa Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 7 minutes ago, ObiW said: U Teksasu je bilo daleko gore, sto se tice licne bezbednosti. Zena koja mi je to pricala rekla je da je pocela da nosi pistolj negde 1990 ili 91 jer je u to vreme naglo porastao broj oruzanih pljacki, silovanja i ubistava. Navodno u to vreme u Teksasu nije postojala dozivotna robija i otprilike je bilo pravilo da se odsluzi 2/3 kazne pre nego sto se kriminalci puste uslovno na slobodu. Nekako se pogodilo da je pocetkom devedesetih dosta takvih pusteno na slobodu, i ljudi koji do tada nisu nosili oruzje su poceli da ga nose. Sredinom devedesetih je poostrena kaznena politika na saveznom nivou (three strikes and you're out, Bajden je za to glasao), a u Teksasu uvedena je dozivotna robija i zabranjeno je nosenje oruzja bez dozvole. Sve tri stvari su posledica veoma visoke stope kriminala pre tacno 30 godina. Three strikes and you're out i assault weapon ban su dva zakona za koje je Klintonova administracija imala podrsku i republikanaca i demokrata. Thanx za info...
ObiW Posted June 22, 2021 Posted June 22, 2021 I republikanci konja za trku imaju: Abbott vetoes criminal justice bills, bills to protect dogs, teach kids about domestic violence Pazi ovo: Another House criminal justice priority bill vetoed was Senate Bill 281 by state Sen. Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa, D-McAllen, which called for the ban on using statements obtained through hypnosis in a criminal court. If passed, the bill would have helped bring an end to a controversial practice that law enforcement in Texas used close to 1,800 times over the course of 40 years, according to a Dallas Morning News Investigation. Ko voli pse, bolje da ne cita sta je ovaj mamlaz blokirao: Another bill that fell victim to Abbott’s veto was Senate Bill 474, known as the Safe Outdoor Dogs Act. The bill would have made it illegal to chain up dogs and leave them without drinkable water, adequate shade or shelter. It also called for a ban on tethering dogs with heavy chains. Sta ce Teksasu broadband internet? House Bill 2667 would have provided universal service fund assistance for Texans. Abbott named broadband access as one of his priority items for the legislative session, but he shot down the bill saying it would’ve imposed more taxes on Texans everywhere. The bill proposed that those receiving assistance through the Texas Universal Service Fund — which helps those in the states receive basic telecommunications services — be charged a universal fee for services. An analysis of the bill stated that recent decisions from the Public Utility Commission of Texas, which funds the TUSF, has placed customers in rural areas at risk of losing telephone services or paying high costs for services. I ovo je biser... udario veto na zakon koji je zahtevao da deca u skoli uce o nasilju u porodici, zato sto...pazi sad... u zakonu nije ostavljeno prostora roditeljima da ispisu decu sa tog kursa Abbott also vetoed Senate Bill 1109, which would have required middle school and high school students to learn about child abuse prevention, family violence and dating violence. He said in his veto explanation that he opposed the legislation because it doesn’t give parents the option to opt out of instruction.
Recommended Posts