9 hours ago, Mr.Mxyzptlk said:

pro israel son of nazi d what

:pretendstobeshocked:

intifada looks like” ~ Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post

“The Intifada Comes to Australia” ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali, The Free Press

“Welcome to the global intifada” ~ David Harsanyi, Washington Examiner

“Palestinian propaganda has globalized the intifada” ~ Zachary Faria, Washington Examiner

“Bondi Beach massacre is what globalizing the intifada looks like” ~ Vivian Bercovici, National Post

“Chanting ‘globalise the intifada’ leads to Bondi Beach” ~ Danny Cohen, The Telegraph

“I have a simple question for leftists after the antisemitic shooting in Australia. What do you think ‘globalize the intifada’ means?” ~ US Senator Ted Cruz

“That attack in Sydney is exactly what it means to ‘globalize intifada.’ We saw the actual application of the globalization of intifada in Sydney.” ~ New York City Mayor Eric Adams

“These are the results of the anti-Semitic rampage in the streets of Australia over the past two years, with the anti-Semitic and inciting calls of ‘Globalise the Intifada’ that were realized today.” ~ Gideon Sa’ar, Foreign Minister of Israel

“When you refuse to condemn and only ‘discourage’ use of the term ‘Globalize the Intifada,’ you help facilitate (not cause) the thinking that leads to Bondi Beach.” ~ Former US antisemitism envoy Deborah Lipstadt (addressing New York City Mayor Elect Zohran Mamdani)

“What on earth do you think globalise the intifada means? And can’t people see the link between that kind of rhetoric and attacks on Jewish people as Jewish people? Because that’s what really struck at the heart of Jewish people in our country today — an attack on Jewish people organising around Hannukah, coming together as Jewish people.” ~ UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting

“Why is it still allowed? What is the meaning of globalise the intifada? I’ll tell you the meaning… it’s what happened on Bondi Beach yesterday.” ~ Ephraim Mirvis, Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom

“Calls to ‘globalise the intifada’ and chants of ‘from the river to the sea’ are not abstract or rhetorical slogans. They are explicit calls for violence, and they carry deadly consequences. What we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of sustained radicalisation that has been allowed to fester under the guise of protest.” ~ Israeli embassy in the UK

“This is what happens when you ‘globalize the intifada.’” ~ Newsweek editors

“This was not an isolated act of violence — it was the culmination of ‘globalise the intifada’ rhetoric that has been building around the world since October 7.” ~ Yoni Bashan, The Times

“For those who’ve been marching these past few years demanding to ‘globalise the intifada’ this is a barbarous anti-Semitic consequence of their pro-Islamist stupidity.” ~ Former BBC anchor Andrew Neil “When people call to ‘globalise the intifada’, this is what they are calling for: dead Jews, terrorism and families shattered forever.” ~ Campaign Against Antisemitism spokesperson

“Taking a stand against antisemitism after Bondi Beach should begin with an unequivocal recognition that ‘intifada’ rhetoric is hate speech.” ~ The Bulwark’s Cathy Young

https://x.com/caitoz/status/2001055324376363274

Ah, ta čuvena i malobrojna govna Brajana Tamaki, sa svojom privatnom crkvom, skupim autima i motorima, a ovo rade i na prajdu i svakakvim dogadjajima da naprave PR.

Haka za Isusa

Nisam bio siguran gde da stavim, ovo, ali iako su ovo podaci za UK, ista priča je širom sveta. Kad vas sledeći put preko društvenih mreža budu zastrašivali da oni drugi dolaze da vam zakolju decu i pojedu psa. Život u razvijenom svetu nije nikad bio sigurniji nego danas.

Edited December 29, 2025Dec 29 by Venom

Pa kad su kola sranje, normalnog čoveka je sramota da ga vide unutra. Kuće prazne u ovoj krizi, ajde što je novac elektronski, nego i zlato nam prodaju preko telefona, i kažu to je sad tvoje, majke mi. I kako onda pošten čovek da se bavi sitnim kriminalom

5 hours ago, Venom said:

Nisam bio siguran gde da stavim, ovo, ali iako su ovo podaci za UK, ista priča je širom sveta. Kad vas sledeći put preko društvenih mreža budu zastrašivali da oni drugi dolaze da vam zakolju decu i pojedu psa. Život u razvijenom svetu nije nikad bio sigurniji nego danas.

Uvek, ali uvek, ove cifre moraju da idu uz metodologiju i da li je bilo promene klasifikacije.

Ne mozemo za Svedsku da tvrdimo nema nista, to je zbog promene klasifikacije nedela, a da verujemo u random chart u skladu sa nasim preferencijama.

@Venom oko britanske statistike

Lancaster University, PlosOne. Zvonko Mihajlovski, statistika, bikini.

Uveek provera kada nesto looks too good or too bad to be true.

https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/maths/about-us/news/how-violent-is-britain-new-study-examines-conflicting-trends-in-official-violent-crime-stats

A new study examining conflicting trends in official violent crime stats reveals that the leading measure in England and Wales underestimates the level of violent crime - and the findings challenge official confidence in a downward trend.

“The findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales that shows violent crime to be in decline contrasts sharply with the data recorded by the police, which is showing an increase,” said Brian Francis, Professor of Social Statistics at Lancaster University and lead author of the study. “It’s important for a wide range of reasons that we have an accurate picture of violent crime in Britain. Our study shows why the datasets differ and why we need to question the reliance of the UK Office for Statistics Regulation on a single dataset for violent crime.”

The two datasets gain their information in different ways: the police data is from those reporting crime to them, and the survey from a sample of the residential population. The two datasets also measure violence in different ways, with some violent offences, such as stalking, excluded from the survey.

In order to make a statistically valid comparison the researchers aligned both series to measure the same narrower set of violent crimes (assaults) in England and Wales going back to 2010 and limited the analysis in both sources to crime reported to the police.

The comparison of the aligned datasets shows that in 2022-23 there were nearly 1,300,000 reported assaults reported to the police, compared with just over 400,000 reported assaults estimated by the Crime Survey- more than three times as large.

The researchers examined possible reasons for why the two datasets are trending in different directions.

They conclude that improvements in police accuracy in recording crime explains part of the difference. The researchers believe differences in data-collecting methods offers other explanations.

Researchers believe other key reasons for differences in trends shown by the datasets is that the survey population is narrower than in police records because the CSEW excludes vulnerable groups such as children, the homeless and those in temporary accommodation like hostels and refuges.

These exclusions from sampling of vulnerable groups by the CSEW as well as the recent reduction in the survey’s response rate to 42% also concern the researchers.

Sylvia Walby, Professor of Criminology at Royal Holloway, and co-author of the study, said: “Our assessment of the methodology is that the quality of the data on violent crime in police recorded crime has improved while that in the Crime Survey for England and Wales has declined.”

“Based on our estimates, the CSEW seriously underestimates the volume of violent crime in England and Wales”, said Professor Walby. “We believe the main part of the CSEW has always underestimated violent crime, and this has become visible now that police data has improved.”

Edited December 30, 2025Dec 30 by Budja

@Budja

Sa tvog linka

In order to make a statistically valid comparison the researchers aligned both series to measure the same narrower set of violent crimes (assaults) in England and Wales going back to 2010

Ne znam odakle su ovi podaci dole, ali rekao bih da su policijski i da nije survey jer je teško napraviti ispitivanje među ubijenima. Znači kad ideš ulicom u nekoj razvijenoj zemlji Evrope daleko je manje verovatno da će te neko ubiti danas nego 1990. Jel makar to nije sporno?

Drugo, zaključci te studije koju si linkovao su donekle bizarni. Prvo kritikuju istraživanje kao loše, jer se razlikuje od podataka policije, onda uzmu procenat prijavljenih slučajeva iz te iste studije (koja po njima nije dobra) i koriste taj podatak da uvećaju broj prijavljenih slučajeva policiji da bi došli do po njima stvarnog broja. Itd.

6 hours ago, Venom said:

@Budja

Sa tvog linka

In order to make a statistically valid comparison the researchers aligned both series to measure the same narrower set of violent crimes (assaults) in England and Wales going back to 2010

Ne znam odakle su ovi podaci dole, ali rekao bih da su policijski i da nije survey jer je teško napraviti ispitivanje među ubijenima. Znači kad ideš ulicom u nekoj razvijenoj zemlji Evrope daleko je manje verovatno da će te neko ubiti danas nego 1990. Jel makar to nije sporno?

Drugo, zaključci te studije koju si linkovao su donekle bizarni. Prvo kritikuju istraživanje kao loše, jer se razlikuje od podataka policije, onda uzmu procenat prijavljenih slučajeva iz te iste studije (koja po njima nije dobra) i koriste taj podatak da uvećaju broj prijavljenih slučajeva policiji da bi došli do po njima stvarnog broja. Itd.

Studija je savrseno transparentna, i ono sto rade istrazivaci logicno.

Pre ce biti da ti se zakljucak ne svidja.

Moja poenta je da se podaci o nasilnim zlocinima na obe strane debate zloupotrebljavaju, od "nikad sigurnije" do "izadjes na ulicu i imigrant te ubije", arealnost je ni crna ni bela nego siva.

Our World in Data

Homicide data: how sources differ and when to use which one

There are several ways to measure homicides. What approaches do different sources take? And when is which approach best?

3 hours ago, Budja said:

Studija je savrseno transparentna, i ono sto rade istrazivaci logicno.

Pre ce biti da ti se zakljucak ne svidja.

Moja poenta je da se podaci o nasilnim zlocinima na obe strane debate zloupotrebljavaju, od "nikad sigurnije" do "izadjes na ulicu i imigrant te ubije", arealnost je ni crna ni bela nego siva.

Our World in Data

Homicide data: how sources differ and when to use which one

There are several ways to measure homicides. What approaches do different sources take? And when is which approach best?

Ako mi se neki zaključak ne sviđa to je zaključak u kojem se koriste podaci iz ispitivanja za koje su rekli da nije adekvatno.

Na ovom drugom linku koji si sad postovao piše da se razlikuje procena toga šta je ubistvo i daje primer jedne zemlje gde se zbilja razlikuju procene, ali po svim procenama se stopa smanjuje

Edited December 30, 2025Dec 30 by Venom

mislim da će ova godina biti kontrolom, ne brinite, puška je zakočena

U iranu veselo vec 5 dana

Izgorelo pedesetak ljudi i preko sto povređeno u novogodišnjoj noći u poznatom švajcarskom skijaškom centru Kran Montani. Po svemu sudeći, požar je izbio tako što su varnice iz onih vatrometa za tortu zakačenih na flaše koje je neko previše podigao zahvatile lakozapaljivu talasastu zvučnu izolaciju na plafonu.

severity of their injuries. Witnesses and investigators believe the blaze was sparked at approximately 1:30 a.m. when a waitress, carried on a colleague's shoulders during a champagne service, held a sparkler that ignited flammable soundproofing foam and wood panels on the ceiling. The fire spread with catastrophic speed, leading to a "flashover" that caused the entire enclosed basement bar to ignite almost instantly.

The tragedy was compounded by a narrow, single staircase that served as the only exit for the more than 100 revellers—mostly teenagers and young adults—trapped inside. More than 115 survivors are currently being treated at specialist burns units across Switzerland, France, and Italy, many in critical condition. Swiss President Guy Parmelin described the event as one of the nation's worst tragedies, while King Charles III issued a statement expressing his heartbreak over the loss of young lives. Local authorities are now investigating whether safety regulations were breached, as sparklers were reportedly banned in similar venues due to extreme fire risks.

🙏 Please share to spread awareness

⚠️ DISCLAIMER: The information shared is based on initial reports and official statements, may not be fully verified, and is presented as reported. Details are subject to change

🔔 Follow for more Updates

👁️ Source: Daily Mail

https://x.com/TrueCrimeUpdat/status/2006918155386630438

Klub u kome je došlo do požara na svom YT nalogu ima objavljen samo jedan video, i u njemu se reklamiraju tim vatrometima zakačenim za flaše.

Edited January 2Jan 2 by vememah