Twitter v2.0 - powered by Elon

[Lord Protector]

Stand with X to protect free speech
By 
X Safety
Saturday, 18 November 2023
   
This week Media Matters for America posted a story that completely misrepresented the real user experience on X, in another attempt to undermine freedom of speech and mislead advertisers.

Above everything, including profit, X works to protect the public’s right to free speech. But for speech to be truly free, we must also have the freedom to see or hear things that some people may consider objectionable. We believe that everyone has the right to make up their own minds about what to read, watch, or listen to – because that’s the power of freedom of speech.

Despite our clear and consistent position, X has seen a number of attacks from activist groups like Media Matters and legacy media outlets who seek to undermine freedom of expression on our platform because they perceive it as a threat to their ideological narrative and those of their financial supporters. These groups try to use their influence to attack our revenue streams by deceiving advertisers on X.

Here are the facts on Media Matters’ research:

To manipulate the public and advertisers, Media Matters created an alternate account and curated the posts and advertising appearing on the account’s timeline to misinform advertisers about the placement of their posts. These contrived experiences could be applied to any platform. 
Once they curated their feed, they repeatedly refreshed their timelines to find a rare instance of ads serving next to the content they chose to follow. Our logs indicate that they forced a scenario resulting in 13 times the number of ads served compared to the median ads served to an X user. 
Of the 5.5 billion ad impressions on X that day, less than 50 total ad impressions were served against all of the organic content featured in the Media Matters article.
For one brand showcased in the article, one of its ads ran adjacent to a post 2 times and that ad was seen in that setting by only two users, one of which was the author of the Media Matters article.
For another brand showcased in the article, two of its ads served adjacent to 2 posts, 3 times, and that ad was only seen in that setting by one user, the author of the Media Matters article.
Media Matters’ article also highlights nine posts they believe should not be allowed on X. Upon evaluation, only one of the nine organic posts featured in the article violated our content policies, and we’ve taken action on it under our Freedom of Speech, Not Reach enforcement approach.
Here’s a summary on this all:

X will protect the public’s right to free expression. We will not allow agenda-driven activists, or even our own profits, to deter our vision.
Everyone has a choice on X. User and brand controls on X are superior to a year ago. 
Data wins over allegations. Media Matters does not reflect the user experience on X.
As we’ve seen in some parts of the world, when free expression is taken away, it is very dangerous and hard to get back – that’s why the people who came before us fought so hard to protect. Without freedom of speech we lose the checks and balances critical to a thriving democracy. We must defend our individual rights as if our lives, and flourishing society, depend on it.

If you’re really in on protecting free speech, then we all need to protect it completely. 

Stand with X to protect free speech.

 

X Safety

 

 

Tužba na 15. strana protiv Media Mattersa:

 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24172809-x-v-media-matters-complaint-filestamped-1

 

Edited December 1, 2023 by Lord Protector

[Venom]

Jedini što mi ovaj tekst govori je:

 

1) količina praćenja korisnika na Twitteru je da se zabezekneš. Znaju koliko puta si refreshovao stranu i koje konkretne reklame je svaki korisnik dobio?

2) mnogo ih je potreslo

 

I ne razumem šta tačno žele da dokažu:

 

For one brand showcased in the article, one of its ads ran adjacent to a post 2 times and that ad was seen in that setting by only two users, one of which was the author of the Media Matters article.

 

Ovo je ono što se zove weasel words - šta znači "in that setting"? Kad bi ih pritisli da kažu, rekli bi verovatno nešto tipa između dva konkretna tweeta. Ali takvog sadržaja ima na tone, mogu da budu bilo koja dva nacistička tweeta.

[Lord Protector]

@Venom Ne znam na šta misliš, na gornji tekst ili tužbu? Tužba je detaljnija

 

što se tiče praćenja, mora tako... biznis analitika, ovakvi slučaji koji imaju sudski epilog, milion razloga je za to. Problem je ko ima pristup tim podacima i eventualna zloupotreba podataka.

Edited December 1, 2023 by Lord Protector

[Weenie Pooh]

 

[Tpojka]

6 hours ago, Lord Protector said:

ko ima pristup tim podacima

 

Onaj ko ima pristup request log serverima.

[copkillah]

[mustang]

Sinoc ja jednom kazem da upali svetla na autu, dok sam prelazila ulicu, on meni "vidim ja"  

 

Ja njemu "bravo, good for you, but others won't see you dude" 

I krene da trazi po autu gde se pali. Upali ih na kraju, posle se razmišljam, mozda ih maznuo?!? 

Edited December 1, 2023 by mustang

[Braća Strugacki]

mora da je komunista, mamu mu jebem 

[Weenie Pooh]

 

Edited December 1, 2023 by Weenie Pooh

[Braća Strugacki]

prirodna selekcija ftw

[dragance]

18 minutes ago, Weenie Pooh said:

 

Zbog ovoga nemaju dozvolu da ga prodaju u EU i UK. Što naravno ne saopštavaju javno.

[mustang]

Sta je crumple?

[Lezilebovich]

1 minute ago, dragance said:

Zbog ovoga nemaju dozvolu da ga prodaju u EU i UK. Što naravno ne saopštavaju javno.

Zezas ?

u US su toliko nizi standardi bezbednosti ? 

[Weenie Pooh]

3 minutes ago, dragance said:

Zbog ovoga nemaju dozvolu da ga prodaju u EU i UK. Što naravno ne saopštavaju javno.

 

Zato im je Model Y preplavio Evropu.

 

2 minutes ago, mustang said:

Sta je crumple?

 

Crumple zone je deo automobila koji treba da se zgužva kod sudara kako bi ublažio impact na vozaču.

 

CT je zbog stubby dizajna skraćen napred, nisu imali mesta da tu ništa naprave, zato mu je rizik od fatalnog ishoda pojačan.

 

Ove testove još obavljaju na ~20 mph, a u prodaji se hvale kako dostiže 60 mph za samo par sekundi  

[mustang]

@Weenie Pooh thx

 

Okej, verovatno je glupo pitanje, al zasto je potrebno da se ima taj zone kada je cyber napravljen od jednog celog kalupa, celika, i kada bi udario u nešto, ne mogu da skapiram kako bi se neko unutra onda povredio jer ce taj celik da ga stiti. Zar ne? 

Otprilike kao kad si na rollercoaster, i nabijen su ono sediste kad naglo krene i zakoci tebi noge lete ( ako si u onom sedistu gde su ti noge slobodne). 

 

 

Edited December 1, 2023 by mustang