Svet

[Lord Protector]

Tako mu Desnog sektora i ukrajinske partije Slobode, Anduril je u pravu, setih se jedne vesti iz februara u vezi korumpiranih austrijskih nacista, Evrope, Kosova, Rusa i Srba:

 

Quote

The head of the delegation of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) in the European Parliament, Harald Vilimsky, and the head of the FPO parliamentary group in the Vienna Assembly, Maximilian Krauss, assessed the "blackmail methods" applied by the EU to membership candidate Serbia as completely unacceptable.

In the statement, they indicate that in recent days there have been increasingly frequent reports that Serbia is being forced to impose sanctions on Russia and accept the Kosovo independence so that it can continue the accession process.

"The EU is twisting the arms of the candidate for membership more and more only because its president does not want to follow all the points of the EU elite's failed politics and because he watches his people. While in Turkey, the ruler Erdogan, who is even waging war against Kurz and does not even think about sanctions against Russia, he enjoys every freedom, and completely different rules are applied against Serbia. The hypocrisy of the EU is becoming increasingly intolerable," Vilimsky and Krauss emphasized.

 

 

Edited May 8, 2023 by slow

[Peter Fan]

16 hours ago, Budja said:

Politicki zemljostres u Cileu.

 

Pinoceova ultra-desnicca ima vecinu u Ustavotvornom savetu izabranmo veceras:

22 Republikanci (pinoceisti)

17 Vladajuca leva koalicija

11 tradicionalna desnica

 

Posto imaju manje od 20 clanova saveta, nemaju ni pravo veta koje jre ranije ustanovljeno za grupe od 20 poslanika.

 

Tako da Pinoceisti, koji nisu hteli da menjaju Ustav, saada pisu novi.

 

Taj novi Ustav, kao i onaj kilometarski levice gde je bio otvoren bar za najludje ideje i koji je odbacen na referendumu, treba da se odobri na referendumu u decembru.

 

Pisalo se na drugoj temi o pogrosanju sigurnosti u Cileu. Sve na vodenicu ultra-desnice koja je, ovaj put, pocistila i tradicionalnu desnicu .

 

Bas sam htio da pitam, kako da je takav zaokret dosao za svega godinu dana? Da li je Boric toliko los ili toliko progresivan da je zaplasio neutralne?

[Budja]

17 minutes ago, Peter Fan said:

Bas sam htio da pitam, kako da je takav zaokret dosao za svega godinu dana? Da li je Boric toliko los ili toliko progresivan da je zaplasio neutralne?

 

Osecaj nesigurnosti.

 

Zbog istog je tradicionalna desnica ciji je predsednik bio Pineira pukla na predsednickim izborima, i jos uvek se nije oporavila. Kako se situacija samo pogorsava, krivi se logicno vlast, i ostaje jedina alternativa ona koja nije bila na vlasti, austajderi - Pinoceisti.

 

Drugim recima, nije to zaokret udesno vec vise vapaj za sigurnoscu.

 

Kod nas je predsednik iz desnice, a izgubio je i referendum i lokalne izbore od Koreine levice. Da se danas odrzavaju izbori, Korea bi dobio dvotrecinsku vecinu.

 

Dakle, moja interpretacija je da ti ludi preokreti nemaju veze sa ideologijom vec sa opstom narko-nestabilnoscu.

 

Ekonomija nije toliko losa da se moze kriviti za ovo.

 

 

[namenski]

3 hours ago, Anduril said:

Da, veliki broj bivsih politicara i to vise u nekoj polu-koruptnoj semi poput Sredera, ali ne i ideoloski.

Jebote: esencija, Alfa i Omega modernog jebemligacega - pare su pare, a ideologija je ideologija.

Ili - ако смо браћа, кесе нам нису сестре...  

 

Ovim se moze braniti/zastupati/napadati/objasniti bukvalno sve sto coveku na pamet padne: na primer i to kako ubedjeni demokrati sa zapada, zapenusani branitelji pravih^tm vrednosti saradjuju i sa 1 vucicem znajuci ko je, sta je i kakav je...

 

Politicko licemerje izdignuto na pijedestal modernog bozanstva, lek za svaku savest, opravdanje za svaku niskost, politicku manipulaciju.

[borris_]

U pakistanu se situacija zaostrava od kada su zatvorili bivseg premjera Imran khana. 

 

Pricamo o zemlji koja ima nuklearno oruzije.

[vememah]

 

[Gojko & Stojko]

Ben Roberts-Smith case: Former SAS soldier committed war crimes

A Federal Court judge has found decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith murdered unarmed prisoners while deployed in Afghanistan, in a historic victory for the three media outlets at the centre of his multimillion-dollar defamation suit.

 

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko found The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and the Canberra Times had also proven that he had bullied fellow soldiers, but not that he had committed an act of domestic violence against a lover. However, in the context of the fact that the other allegations had been proved, Besanko found did not further harm Roberts-Smith’s reputation and therefore should be dismissed.

 

The war veteran’s defamation trial against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald, owned by Nine, and The Canberra Times, now under separate ownership, concluded in July last year after 110 days, 41 witnesses and more than $25 million in legal costs.

 

It is among the largest and most expensive defamation trials ever conducted in Australia and the first to examine in detail allegations of war crimes against members of the Special Air Service.

 

Roberts-Smith launched Federal Court defamation proceedings against the media outlets in August 2018 over a series of six articles published earlier that year. Half of the articles were online versions of the same print stories. He alleged the newspapers made up to 15 false and defamatory claims about him, including accusing him of war crimes and an act of domestic violence against a former lover.

 

In a judgment delivered on Thursday, Besanko ruled that 13 imputations were conveyed by the articles, including that Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed civilians, broken the rules of law and disgraced his country. The newspapers sought to rely chiefly on a defence of truth to any of the meanings found to have been conveyed.

 

The media outlets alleged Roberts-Smith was involved in the murder of six Afghan prisoners, contrary to the rules of engagement that bound the SAS. The unlawful executions took place over five days in 2009 and 2012, the newspapers alleged, and the mastheads called 20 serving and former SAS soldiers to give evidence.

 

Roberts-Smith denied wrongdoing. He said five of the killings happened lawfully in battle, while the sixth killing did not happen.

 

Besanko found the news outlets had established the substantial truth of the key allegation in the case: that Roberts-Smith was involved in the unlawful killing of unarmed Afghan prisoners.

 

While not every murder allegation was established by the newspapers, the judge found they had proven some of those alleged killings had taken place. It was sufficient for Besanko to dismiss Roberts-Smith’s lawsuit.

 

SaE

[x500]

@Gojko & Stojko na koliko je osudjen za ratni zlocin(e) koje je pocinio? Na osnovu teksta nije najjasnine koliko ce da robija.

[Lezilebovich]

11 minutes ago, x500 said:

@Gojko & Stojko na koliko je osudjen za ratni zlocin(e) koje je pocinio? Na osnovu teksta nije najjasnine koliko ce da robija.

Pa nista ne robija, on je valjda tuzio te novine, a nije on bio krivicno gonjen. Sud je pokazao da novibe nisu lagale. A mozda sam i ja sve pogresno shvatio :(

[jms_uk]

1 hour ago, x500 said:

@Gojko & Stojko na koliko je osudjen za ratni zlocin(e) koje je pocinio? Na osnovu teksta nije najjasnine koliko ce da robija.

 

Nema robije, nego treba da isplati neke silne milione koje nema.

[namenski]

Svakog dana u svakom pogledu..., tek: Kina je pre 10-ak dana postavila 3 navigacione plutace u okolini ostrvlja Spratley, u vodama koje mnogi smatraju spornim...

Osim Kine...

Plutace su postavljene u vodama koje spadaju u najvaznije svetske pomorske puteve: kinesko obrazlozenje glasi da su one, naravno, postavljene zarad bezbednosti navigacije i to je jedini komentar kineske strane na horske proteste zainteresovanih, uz aneks da ce se Kina u skladu sa najvisim standardima brinuti za njihovo odrzavanje...

Na stranu to sto dirnuti ih ne dolazi u obzir osim ako se ne zeli direktna i ostra konfrontacija...

[bags]

Fino se kuva svugde po svetu. Bice veliki picvajz za max 5 godina.

[namenski]

5 minutes ago, bags said:

Fino se kuva svugde po svetu. Bice veliki picvajz za max 5 godina.

Videcemo...  

Inace, ukrajinski scenario^tm je mnoge, narocito akademce^tm navukao na povlacenje paralela Kina - Tajvan, sto bi u praksi  znacilo otskrinuta vrata da se Kina i SAD ne konfrontiraju direktno, nego da se Tajvanu pomogne da pruzi otpor eventualnom kineskom pokusaju invazije...

I da to potraje.

Muka je u tome sto niko nema odgovor na pitanje sta ako se Kina odluci ne za ukrajinski nego za kubanski scenario...

Pomorsku blokadu Tajvana koja bi obe sile, i Kinu i SAD sucelila direktno buduci da bi americki - bas kao svojevremeno sovjetski - brodovi mogli, ako ne i morali da pokusaju da blokadu probiju...

[gone fishing]

starac kisindžer od stotinu ljeta smatra da kina i ameri imaju još 5 do max 10 godina da se dogovore o spornim pitanjima pre nego što uđu u sukob

[namenski]

Paradoksalno je, ali samo na prvi pogled: izmedju SAD i Kine - nema spornih pitanja.

Ukoliko, samo primera radi, SAD odgovore sta to brane braneci Tajvan?

Pitanje, a i odgovor su imali smisla u ideoloska vremena kada su nezavisnost pa i samo postojanje Tajvana bili dovoljan razlog, vojni razlozi na stranu i onako su u slucaju Tajvana kada je direktna konfrontacija Kina - SAD u pitanju nevazni.