bergasa19 Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 Pa stavio sam kao da je pisao nas NJUZ. Ne vidim sto se Indy buni.
luba Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 kolicina nesmesnosti njuz.neta ravna je kursadzijskim dometima navodnih pionira duhovitosti, kao i kvalitet dnevnika.hr kao novinarske vedete u jadnosti ex-yu medijskih prostora.
Indy Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 Pa stavio sam kao da je pisao nas NJUZ. Ne vidim sto se Indy buni.A izvini, nisam ukapirao salu. Nisam bas u toku.
dunja Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 [/url] China campaign cuts entertainment TV by two-thirds Satellite broadcasters in China have cut entertainment TV by two-thirds following a government campaign, state news agency Xinhua has reported.An order by the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) to curb ''excessive entertainment'' came into effect on 1 January.The number of entertainment shows aired during prime time each week has dropped to 38 from 126, said the watchdog.The news came as the president warned of the influence of Western culture.... bilo bi interesantno istraziti efekte ovoga na, recimo, radnu produktivnost, stavove prema drugim kulturama, konzumerizam, obrazovna postignuca dece, pa i po taj "influence of the Western culture"...
Zaz_pi Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 Sta kaze Hella na sledecu vest: Rusija uvećava vojni budžetMoskva -- Ruske vlasti najavile su da je modernizacija armije jedan od prioriteta i da planiraju da u tu svrhu do 2020. izdvoje više od 600 milijardi američkih dolara.Uporedo sa reformom, trebalo bi da bude sprovedena borba protiv korupcije u armiji, a zadatak da ostvari ove ciljeve poveren je donedavnom ambasadoru Rusije u sedištu NATO-a u Briselu Dmitriju Rogozinu, koji je imenovan za potpredsednika vlade.Prema navodima televizijske stanice "Raša tudej", ruskoj armiji obećano je oko 640 milijardi dolara za nabavku novog oružja, a, prema rečima prvog zamenika ministra odbrane Aleksandra Suhorukova, nije isključeno da će oružje biti nabavljano iz inostranstva. "Našoj armiji potrebna je savremena i moderna oprema, ali ukoliko ruska vojna industrija ne može to da nam obezbedi, kupovaćemo u inostranstvu", kazao je Suhorukov.Upravo su javne nabavke za vojsku bile problematične poslednjih godina, jer je, prema podacima koje je izneo glavni vojni tužilac Sergej Fridinski, korupcija progutala oko 16,5 odsto vojnog budžeta. On je pre nekoliko meseci naveo da je za korupciju optuženo šest viših i 176 starijih oficira i to samo u prvih šest meseci prošle godine, kao i da je, u odnosu na 2009. korupcija narasla za čitavih 18 odsto. Preuzimajući novu funkciju uoči novogodišnjih praznika, Rogozin je obećao predsedniku Dmitriju Medvedevu da će se protiv korupcije boriti "čeličnom rukom" i bez milosti. Prema predviđanju Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda, taj rast u Rusiji trebalo bi da bude veoma značajan u narednih nekoliko godina, za razliku od zapadnih država, uključujući i SAD, koje su najavile restrikcije vojnog budžeta. :P Rogozin
pacey defender Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 kolicina nesmesnosti njuz.neta ravna je kursadzijskim dometima navodnih pionira duhovitosti, Ok, neka cveta trilion cvetova i sve to, ali ako je njuz.net nesmešan kao kursadžije onda jebi ga.
Indy Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 Hej, neki od nas ne znaju sta su te kursadzije, i mozda ni ne zelimo da znamo. ^_^
Hella Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 (edited) Sta kaze Hella na sledecu vest:ako sam dobro sračunao, ameri za godinu spičkaju koliko rusi za šest. supersila vs. trbušna kila.kolicina nesmesnosti njuz.neta ravna je kursadzijskim dometima navodnih pionira duhovitosti Edited January 4, 2012 by Hella
Zaz_pi Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 Nisi dobro zaracunao. Ovo se odnosi samo na modernizaciju tj. novo naoruzanje a ne na preko 700 baza sirom sveta i ogroman broj placenih vojnika koje treba odrzavati i plus ratovi u toku. A, vidis i da smanjuju :P Ali, cim je tu Rogozin to je sve sumnjivo, tako da nema brige ;)
banecare1 Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 sve sto ruska vlast planira do 2020 je jeftini marketing da se kao nesto radi na drzavnom nivou. takvih planova do 2010 je bilo koliko volis i nista od toga.
steins Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 Policajci u Teksasu pucali i usmrtili učenika osmog razreda u hodniku škole jer je dečak u njih uperio oružje, za koje se ispostavilo da je vazdušni pištolj. Vršilac dužnosti šefa policije u Braunsvilu Orlando Rodriges izjavio je da je Džejmi Gonzales (15) imao "mnoštvo prilika" da spusti oružje, ali da to "nije želeo". sve po PSu.
hazard Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 Zbignjev Bzezinski pise u Foreign Policy:http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/8_geopolitically_endangered_species 8 Geopolitically Endangered SpeciesMeet the weaker countries that will suffer from American decline.BY ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI | JAN/FEB 2012With the decline of America's global preeminence, weaker countries will be more susceptible to the assertive influence of major regional powers. India and China are rising, Russia is increasingly imperially minded, and the Middle East is growing ever more unstable. The potential for regional conflict in the absence of an internationally active America is real. Get ready for a global reality characterized by the survival of the strongest. 1. GEORGIAAmerican decline would leave this tiny Caucasian state vulnerable to Russian political intimidation and military aggression. The United States has provided Georgia with $3 billion in aid since 1991 -- $1 billion of that since its 2008 war with Russia. America's decline would put new limitations on U.S. capabilities, and could by itself stir Russian desires to reclaim its old sphere of influence. What's more, once-and-future Russian President Vladimir Putin harbors an intense personal hatred toward Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili.At stake: Russian domination of the southern energy corridor to Europe, possibly leading to more pressure on Europe to accommodate Moscow's political agenda; a domino effect on Azerbaijan. 2. TAIWANSince 1972, the United States has formally accepted the mainland's "one China" formula while maintaining that neither side shall alter the status quo by force. Beijing, however, reserves the right to use force, which allows Washington to justify its continued arms sales to Taiwan. In recent years, Taiwan and China have been improving their relationship. America's decline, however, would increase Taiwan's vulnerability, leaving decision-makers in Taipei more susceptible to direct Chinese pressure and the sheer attraction of an economically successful China. That, at the least, could speed up the timetable for cross-strait reunification, but on unequal terms favoring the mainland.At stake: Risk of a serious collision with China.3. SOUTH KOREAThe United States has been the guarantor of South Korea's security since it was attacked in 1950 by North Korea, with Soviet and Chinese collusion. Seoul's remarkable economic takeoff and democratic political system testify to the success of U.S. engagement. Over the years, however, North Korea has staged a number of provocations against South Korea, ranging from assassinations of its cabinet members to the 2010 sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan. So America's decline would confront South Korea with painful choices: either accept Chinese regional dominance and further reliance on China to rein in the nuclear-armed North, or seek a much stronger, though historically unpopular, relationship with Japan out of shared democratic values and fear of aggression from Pyongyang and Beijing.At stake: Military and economic security on the Korean Peninsula; a general crisis of confidence in Japan and South Korea regarding the reliability of existing American commitments. 4. BELARUSTwenty years after the fall of the Soviet Union, Europe's last dictatorship remains politically and economically dependent on Russia. One-third of its exports go to Russia, on which it is almost entirely reliant for its energy needs. At the same time, President Aleksandr Lukashenko's 17-year dictatorship has stood in the way of any meaningful relations with the West. Consequently, a marked American decline would give Russia a virtually risk-free opportunity to reabsorb Belarus.At stake: The security of neighboring Baltic states, especially Latvia. 5. UKRAINEKiev's relationship with Moscow has been as prone to tension as its relationship with the West has been prone to indecision. In 2005, 2007, and 2009, Russia either threatened to or did stop oil and natural gas from flowing to Ukraine. More recently, President Viktor Yanukovych was pressured to extend Russia's lease of a naval base at the Ukrainian Black Sea port of Sevastopol for another 25 years in exchange for preferential pricing of Russian energy deliveries to Ukraine. The Kremlin continues to press Ukraine to join a "common economic space" with Russia, while gradually stripping Ukraine of direct control over its major industrial assets through mergers and takeovers by Russian firms. With America in decline, Europe would be less willing and able to reach out and incorporate Ukraine into an expanding Western community, leaving Ukraine more vulnerable to Russian designs.At stake: The renewal of Russian imperial ambitions. 6. AFGHANISTANDevastated by nine years of brutal warfare waged by the Soviet Union, ignored by the West for a decade after the Soviet withdrawal, mismanaged by the medieval Taliban, and let down by 10 years of halfhearted U.S. military operations and sporadic economic assistance, Afghanistan is in shambles. With 40 percent unemployment and ranking 215th globally in per capita GDP, it has little economic output beyond its illegal narcotics trade. A rapid U.S. troop disengagement brought on by war fatigue or the early effects of American decline would most likely result in internal disintegration and an external power play among nearby states for influence in Afghanistan. In the absence of an effective, stable government in Kabul, the country would be dominated by rival warlords. Pakistan and India would more assertively compete for influence in Afghanistan -- with Iran also probably involved.At stake: The re-emergence of the Taliban; a proxy war between India and Pakistan; a haven for international terrorism. 7. PAKISTANAlthough Islamabad is armed with 21st-century nuclear weapons and held together by a professional late 20th-century army, the majority of Pakistan is still pre-modern, rural, and largely defined by regional and tribal identities. Conflict with India defines Pakistan's sense of national identity, while the forcible division of Kashmir sustains a shared and profound antipathy. Pakistan's political instability is its greatest vulnerability, and a decline in U.S. power would reduce America's ability to aid Pakistan's consolidation and development. Pakistan could then transform into a state run by the military, a radical Islamic state, a state that combined both military and Islamic rule, or a "state" with no centralized government at all.At stake: Nuclear warlordism; a militant Islamic, anti-Western, nuclear-armed government similar to Iran's; regional instability in Central Asia, with violence potentially spreading to China, India, and Russia. 8. ISRAEL and the GREATER MIDDLE EASTAmerica's decline would set in motion tectonic shifts undermining the political stability of the entire Middle East. All states in the region remain vulnerable to varying degrees of internal populist pressures, social unrest, and religious fundamentalism, as seen by the events of early 2011. If America's decline were to occur with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict still unresolved, the failure to implement a mutually acceptable two-state solution would further inflame the region's political atmosphere. Regional hostility to Israel would then intensify. Perceived American weakness would at some point tempt the more powerful states in the region, notably Iran or Israel, to preempt anticipated dangers. And jockeying for tactical advantage could precipitate eruptions by Hamas or Hezbollah, which could then escalate into wider and bloodier military encounters. Weak entities such as Lebanon and Palestine would pay an especially high price in civilian deaths. Even worse, such conflicts could rise to truly horrific levels through strikes and counterstrikes between Iran and Israel.At stake: Direct Israeli or U.S. confrontation with Iran; a rising tide of Islamic radicalism and extremism; a worldwide energy crisis; vulnerability of America's Persian Gulf allies.
Takeshi Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 For the past 16 years, Japanese police have been looking for Aum Shinrikyo member Makoto Hirata. Images of his face have appeared on thousands of wanted posters, but police failed to find Hirata.All of that changed on the night of December 31st, when Hirata tried to turn himself in to police. But before he could find someone willing to place him under arrest, he was given several opportunities to change his mind and remain a fugitive. Before 9:00 PM – Hirata went to the Osaki police station in Tokyo, but couldn’t locate its entrance. Shortly after 9:00 PM – Hirata tried used a pay phone to call up the police and report his willingness to surrender, but after about 10 attempts he could not get through to them. 11:35 PM – Hirata traveled across town to the police HQ in Kasumigaseki, found an officer on guard duty, and announced his identity. The officer thought Hirata was joking, and told him to surrender himself at a normal police station instead. 11:50 PM – Hirata walked 600 meters to the Marunouchi police station, where he finally found an officer willing to place him under arrest.
Recommended Posts