3 minutes ago, Shan Jan said:

Joj, nemoj ovu, ona je kao Tabloid, kaže neku istinu, zamotanu u gomilu gluposti, pa nemožeš raspetljati...

Profesor Dave ju je par puta toliko razbicao, da ni dugmići nisu ostali...

Nisam znao za to ali ovo sto prica mi ima smisla. Deluje mi da je LLM udario vec u plafon i da necemo videti neki ogroman napredak koji ce da promeni svet. Mozda neki drugi model, neka druga tehnologija...

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees. $30 per seat per month. $1.4 million annually. I called it "digital transformation." The board loved that phrase. They approved it in eleven minutes. No one asked what it would actually do. Including me. I told everyone it would "10x productivity." That's not a real number. But it sounds like one. HR asked how we'd measure the 10x. I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards." They stopped asking. Three months later I checked the usage reports. 47 people had opened it. 12 had used it more than once. One of them was me. I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds. It took 45 seconds. Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations. But I called it a "pilot success." Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail. The CFO asked about ROI. I showed him a graph. The graph went up and to the right. It measured "AI enablement." I made that metric up. He nodded approvingly. We're "AI-enabled" now. I don't know what that means. But it's in our investor deck. A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT. I said we needed "enterprise-grade security." He asked what that meant. I said "compliance." He asked which compliance. I said "all of them." He looked skeptical. I scheduled him for a "career development conversation." He stopped asking questions. Microsoft sent a case study team. They wanted to feature us as a success story. I told them we "saved 40,000 hours." I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up. They didn't verify it. They never do. Now we're on Microsoft's website. "Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot." The CEO shared it on LinkedIn. He got 3,000 likes. He's never used Copilot. None of the executives have. We have an exemption. "Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction." I wrote that policy. The licenses renew next month. I'm requesting an expansion. 5,000 more seats. We haven't used the first 4,000. But this time we'll "drive adoption." Adoption means mandatory training. Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches. But completion will be tracked. Completion is a metric. Metrics go in dashboards. Dashboards go in board presentations. Board presentations get me promoted. I'll be SVP by Q3. I still don't know what Copilot does. But I know what it's for. It's for showing we're "investing in AI." Investment means spending. Spending means commitment. Commitment means we're serious about the future. The future is whatever I say it is. As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

ako je osecaj protoka vremena pokazatelj zanimljivosti materijala,

ovaj bioskop nije dosadan.

2 hours ago, makaronee said:

ako je osecaj protoka vremena pokazatelj zanimljivosti materijala,

ovaj bioskop nije dosadan.

Dobar film.

ONO ŠTO SLEDI NIJE DOBRO - Predsednik MENSE Srbije

Consumer Reports

Instacart’s AI-Enabled Pricing Experiments May Be Inflati...

Exclusive: Instacart’s AI pricing may be inflating your grocery bill.

LLM Hallucinations Are Still Absolutely Nuts

A couple months back, a grad student reached out to me to see if I could help with some research they were doing.

The thing to do when you don’t know something is to say that you don’t know something. LLMs hate to do that; they constantly respond to scenarios where they have insufficient information to correctly answer a question by just winging it - by hallucinating. That’s because these are probabilistic engines that have been built to provide plausible seeming answers, to make users feel that they have been informed. Actually informing them is a secondary goal at best.

I would love to take this sort of thing to more-reasonable AI boosters - not your insane Silicon Valley “I’m going to have my own moon” maximalists but your good-natured and gullible fantasists, your Ezra Klein types, who have allowed their desire to live in the cool future to overwhelm their most basic skepticism and standards - and ask them… do you really want these systems to take over mission-critical jobs from human workers? Do you think they’re ready, when they constantly go on wild hallucinatory journeys like this? You want to give this system the ability to influence medical decisions, legal decisions, economic decisions? Decisions of life and death? I am just baffled, baffled, baffled by the refusal of our media to stop and say, guys, this technology does not work.

Gotovo da nema teme koja nije obrađena u ovom remek-delu.

14 hours ago, spettacollo said:

Gotovo da nema teme koja nije obrađena u ovom remek-delu.

Sve je to već napisano na pretposlednjoj strani Politikinog zabavnika

built, powered by infrastructure that may never appear, to satisfy demand that does not actually exist and to obtain profit that is mathematically impossible.

https://x.com/jatinkrmalik/status/2009689523513618887

Oko 23-24-25 minute krenu priču o AI, koja je dosta interesantna, u smislu da su ovo neki malo mnogo pamaetni ljudi... Bukvalno ismavaju ljude koji propagiraju ovakav AI, a i jako su kritični prema očekivanjima od AI...

Zanimljivo poslušati...

Au, vrhunsko poredjenje, tech bros su kao teleevandjelisti, mi imamo resenje za sve, samo nam posaljite vasu lovu

https://x.com/FT/status/2012886770002579487

Podnaslov teksta:

Energy abundance, open-source models and manufacturing strengths will push Beijing into first place

Arhiviran ceo članak:

https://archive.is/PyGpH

Edited January 18Jan 18 by vememah