4 hours ago, Tale said:

Ja sam razvio nešto što nazivam ARC (AI Reflective Continuity) koji je u osnovi organizator arhitekture AI modela bez intervencija na kodu. Osnovna postavka je primenjiva na, pretpostavljam, sve AI modele. Test je uspešno prošao kod ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini i Perplexity.

Pokušavam da pronađem sagovornika na ovu temu, da proverim i utvrdim značaj i potencijal ovakvog projekta.

@Venom

Ništa nisam razumeo, pa nisam siguran da mogu da ti pomognem ☠️

edit: da ne bude zabune mislim da je do mene

Edited September 14, 2025Sep 14 by Venom

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLqA4rAyBwW/?igsh=MTJ2cm9udHd6ZTBiag==

Wall Street Journal o pucanju AI balona: Spending on AI Is at Epic Levels. Will It Ever Pay Off?

Iza zida je tekst, ali citirao sam dole ključne delove. Uglavnom se bavi nenormalnim investicijama u građenje data centara, i skromnim projekcijama kad je RoI u pitanju. Da bi opravdali investicije, bilo bi potrebno da prihodi porastu za nekoliko redova veličine tokom sledećih pet-šest godina.

This week, consultants at Bain & Co. estimated the wave of AI infrastructure spending will require $2 trillion in annual AI revenue by 2030. By comparison, that is more than the combined 2024 revenue of Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Nvidia, and more than five times the size of the entire global subscription software market.

Morgan Stanley estimates that last year there was around $45 billion of revenue for AI products. The sector makes money from a combination of subscription fees for chatbots such as ChatGPT and money paid to use these companies’ data centers.

How the tech sector will cover the gap is “the trillion dollar question,” said Mark Moerdler, an analyst at Bernstein.

There are growing, worrying signs that the optimism about AI won’t pan out.

An MIT report found 95% of organizations surveyed are getting no return on their AI product investments.

OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT-5 in August was widely viewed as an incremental improvement, not the game-changing moment many expected. Given the high cost of developing it, the release fanned concerns that generative AI models are improving at a slower pace than expected.

Each new AI model—ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-5—costs significantly more than the last to train and release to the world, often three to five times the cost of the previous, say AI executives. That means the payback has to be even higher to justify the spending.

Another hurdle: The chips in the data centers won’t be useful forever. Unlike the dot-com boom’s fiber cables, the latest AI chips rapidly depreciate in value as technology improves, much like an older model car.

“This is bigger than all the other tech bubbles put together,” said Roger McNamee, co-founder of tech investor Silver Lake Partners, who has been critical of some tech giants. “This industry can be as successful as the most successful tech products ever introduced and still not justify the current levels of investment.”

Despite the worries, money continues to fly in.

Tekst je o (ne)isplativosti, bavi se samo finansijskom stranom priče, ne dotiče se tehnoloških pitanja tipa "gde sve vidite aplikaciju, braćo i sestre, šta tačno zamišljate i koje droge konzumirate".

biće skoro propast sveta, nek propadne nije šteta

Nisu roboti ukrali novac i vreme za razonodu nego mala grupa gramezljivih psihopata nikad zadovoljnih stecenim.

Pa niko ni ne kaže da je do robota

Kad kaže da predviđa nikad viđenu stopu nezaposlenosti, to može da bude i dobro i loše.

Ovaj ruski sexpert predviđa 99% nezaposlenost posle 2030 a možda nas super ai tada i istrebi kao štetočine

Sinoć pogledao pola, včrs ću da dovršim. Jezivo bode oči izbegavanje teme (pre)raspodele materijalnih dobara u predviđenoj 99-posto-nezaposlenosti budućnosti. I kad pomene, u fazonu je 'lako ćemo obezbediti basic ili čak comfortable existence svima, ali šta će ljudi sa svim tim slobodnim vremenom, gde će naći svrhu i smisao'. Pri tom ne dovodim u pitanje ni osnovanost njegovih predviđanja ni opštu dobru nameru, samo mi je fascinantno koliko je kapitaljizm kao jedini mogući model duboko ukorenjen u tim glavama. A kontam da je ogromnoj većini raje baš ta preraspodela i basic existence ključno pitanje i uopšte mi ne deluje sigurno. Pogotovo kad se malo ode van Kalifornije/NY/WestEU. Koliko će tog dodatnog profita stići u Ajovu, Misuri, Boliviju, Bugarsku, Bangladeš, Čad?

Pre će da bude Elysium nego UBI.

Edited October 1, 2025Oct 1 by jezovuk

Ja ozbiljno razmisljam da je bilo koji pristup u kojem oni pokusaju da programiraju AI osudjen na propast u startu.

U sustini bi ga trebalo doneti na ovaj svet kao i bebu, bez mogucnosti da povredi druge dok ne nauci neke osnove o svetu i sebi samom kroz interakciju sa svetom i nama (roditeljima).

To bio bio next level shit parenting.

Ovo prvo mi zvuci kao Windows 10 koji koristi katastrofalno mnogo energije da vrti sjebane algoritme. Mislim da bi se samounistio da skonta koliko ga energije pokrece. Sreca pa toga sigurno ne bi bilo u algoritmu.

Deloitte Australia will issue a partial refund to the federal government after admitting that artificial intelligence had been used in the creation of a $440,000 report littered with errors including three nonexistent academic references and a made-up quote from a Federal Court judgement.

A new version of the report for the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) was quietly uploaded to the department’s website on Friday, ahead of a long weekend across much of Australia. It features more than a dozen deletions of nonexistent references and footnotes, a rewritten reference list, and corrections to multiple typographic errors.

https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/deloitte-to-refund-government-after-admitting-ai-errors-in-440k-report-20251005-p5n05p?utm_source=afr-web&utm_medium=share_article&utm_campaign=companies&utm_content=fairfax&utm_term=product_feature

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report

Вот почему ИИ, как и предчувствовал наш фокусник, – иллюзия: он воспроизводит результат, а не процесс

Гаспар Кёниг /

Конец индивидуума. Путешествие философа в страну искусственного интеллекта, 2023.

Gaspard Kœnig /

La Fin de l’individu Voyage d’un philosophe au pays de l’intelligence artificielle, 2019.

Bez obzira na gotovo trenutno zastarevanje literature o/oko AI, sutradan posle izlaska iz štampe, kako kaže sam autor - na gotovo svakoj stranici za mene ima materijala za podvlačenje.

Edited October 8, 2025Oct 8 by makaronee
Citat

Zanimljiv tekst:

https://af.net/news/who-pays-for-free-ai