To, mačko!

[Ros]

ovo vredi procitati

 

 

[April]

GDE STE..?

Gde si Jokiću, gde si Tadiću
gde si Ivana, gde si Mitroviću!?
Gde ste sportisti, zar se ne stidite,
zar stvarno ovu bruku ne vidite?

Gde ste kolege teniseri
gde ste košarkaši, fudbaleri?
Rukometaši vaterpolisti,
gde ste svi svetski sportisti?

Gde si čoveče, gde si nestao,
šta su ti dali kada si zaspao?
Dal' su ti amove na glavu stavili,
ili su ponos u tebi ubili?

Gde si Srbijo, što ćutiš mila,
da li si brzo sve zaboravila?
Sve ono što ti je od srca pružio,
zar misliš da je ovo zaslužio?

Gde ste političari,zar petlje nemate,
protesnu notu da im uručite?
Jasno i glasno neka svi čuju,
šta im odavde ljudi poručuju.

Gde si Novače u ovoj noći,
izdan od sviju, da li ćeš moći?
Da li ćeš moći IKONO MILA,
da sprečiš da ti ne slome krila?
[emoji22]

Sent from my M2102J20SG using Tapatalk

[pt 2.0]

Podseća na stil pesnika Mirovića...

[napadaj]

 

 

Najbolje da će Jokić da se javlja, jebe mu se tačno za sve.

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, harper said:

 

Ako su najpre razmisljali o tome kako ce se njihova izjava odraziti na njih i njihove poslove i na kraju reagovali zato sto bi odjeknulo da nisu, onda je bolje da nisu ni reagovali. Valjda reagujes na osnovu prirode dogadjaja na koji reagujes a ne na osnovu kalkulacije koliko ce tebi licno znaciti i sta ces licno dobiti ili izgubiti zbog toga. Mislim, ne ti, pricam principijelno.

 

Potpuno sam saglasan.

[omiljeni]

Jel se javila naša Nina? Nije valjda da i ona kalkuliše, a osetila je na svojoj koži kako je to kad ti japanske vlasti ponište vizu baš pred odlučujuću utakmicu

[Ros]

[Stari tenis fan]

"NAJBOLJE DA SE NOVAK VRATI KUĆI" Radmilo Armenulić rezervisan (novosti.rs)

Armenulic je uvijek bio super odmejern i razuman.

 

Ako se sabere sa ovim sto su australski advokati rekli, to sve vise lici na pogodbu, sto je jedino logicno i razumno!

[harper lee]

https://www.abc.es/opinion/abci-juan-manuel-prada-leyenda-llamada-djokovic-202201101159_noticia.html#vca=rrss-inducido&vmc=abc-es&vso=tw&vli=noticia.opinion

 

Lancia pobedijo.

[duda]

44 minutes ago, Peter Fan said:

Ha, oduvijek smo sumnjali da je Cetnik Sa Reketom agent velikosrpskog hegemonizma, a sad imamo i potvrdu:

divno je kad ameri ovako pišu 

nevinašca mala 

[jezovuk]

[Budja]

2 hours ago, Ros said:

moze li se nize od ovoga

 

 

 

 

Gde ima ta crkva Science? (Nije Tom Kruz)

 

Mogla bi fina sociolosko-politicka teza o religiji zvana Nauka tokom COVIDa da se napise.

 

[duda]

Iznapušavali su je pošteno povodom tog twita

[cedo]

51 minutes ago, harper said:

https://www.abc.es/opinion/abci-juan-manuel-prada-leyenda-llamada-djokovic-202201101159_noticia.html#vca=rrss-inducido&vmc=abc-es&vso=tw&vli=noticia.opinion

 

Lancia pobedijo.

 

samo da pimetim da je ovo pisao Prada (Leia ce znati :D)

 

Spoiler

 

Juan Manuel de Prada

 

 

 

Spoiler

A legend called Djokovic

 

Some time ago I saw an interview with a retired English footballer whose name I can't remember. In an especially introspective passage, he commented, between dismay and perplexity, that the children only approached him to ask him about that mythological goal in which Maradona dribbled past half a dozen players on his team, in the 1986 World Cup.

Maradona became a legend that day not because he scored an amazing goal, but because that goal was grafted onto history, erasing from the battered spirits of an entire people what had happened a few years earlier in the Malvinas. Sports feats disintegrate into oblivion or become boring statistics, when the generation that

 celebrated them; and only when those feats are grafted into history do they become legendary. It happened to Maradona at the World Cup in Mexico, it happened to Jesse Owens at the Berlin Olympics, it happened to Djokovic at the Australian Open. The winner of this edition of the Australian Open may be remembered by a few die-hard tennis fans for a few years; But when those fans have died, the Australian Open will continue to drag the disgrace of having prevented, in its 2022 edition, the participation of a legend . And, in a hundred years, Djokovic will be remembered as Owens or Maradona. Surely there will be others who win more titles or break more records; but they will only leave behind a boring statistic that others more gifted will make pale in the future. Djokovic, on the other hand, no one will be able to dispute the glory of having grafted himself into history forever.

Today it may seem that his is an infamous glory that only 'represents' a minority turned into a scapegoat by a submissive and cowardly generation. Owens, too, represented only filthy blacks; Maradona also represented only a few charlatan sudacas. But the years will pass, the sporting feats of his contemporaries will pass; and the legend of today's stigmatized Djokovic will shine . And, when this submissive generation, like the media of mass cretinization and the tyrants who shepherded it, become together 'on the ground, in smoke, in dust, in shadow, in nothing', the feat of the man who, in a lukewarm time, he refused to bow his head. And God, who sees in the dark, will reward him.

Tennis fans know - and not just because the boring statistics give it away - that Djokovic is a better tennis player than any of the players who have competed with him . Those tennis players know it too , including those who these days have made miserable statements, excited at the possibility of surpassing him in the boring statistic that in fifty years no one will remember. But fifty years from now, when hunched over and decrepit (albeit with the ridiculous hair graft intact) they walk through a park, there will be a child who comes up to them and says: “Is it true that you had the honor of playing with Djokovic? ».

 

[Ted]

pošto sam seriju postova ovde započeo onim u kome sam rekao da me zabole za turnir, tenis i Đokovića, a nakon svega što sam video, čuo, pročitao i saznao u prethodnih nekoliko dana, ja mogu samo da kažem kako su mi se osećanja značajno promenila i da se punog srca priključujem društvu Novakovih teniskih navijača. i ja sam u celu priču ušao sa nekim svojim predubeđenjem da se Đoković glupira i pravi nekakvu farsu. kad ono.

 

nije da do sada nisam navijao za njega ili da sam navijao protiv, naprosto sam ignorisao sve to, pratio na nivou osnovnih informacija, pogledao tu i tamo neki meč. ja sam tenis počeo da pratim kad je Beker bio klinac koji je napravio čudo. i ja sam tad bio klinac i bilo mi je neverovatno zabavno sve to. tada sam baš pratio, voleo da gledam, navijao za Bekera dok je igrao. i Agasija sam gotivio i pratio redovno. još jedan gotivac mi je bio Majkl Čeng, on je isto kao klinac osvojio neki od velikih turnira, ne sećam se koji, bio mi je mnogo simpa i navijao sam za njega iz sveg srca. kako je vreme odmicalo isključio sam se iz priče, nekako mi je dosadno postalo sve to sa tenisom, a i nisam pronalazio igrače poput gore navedenih koji bi me naterali da ih pratim.

 

izgleda da mi se ponovo probudio motiv da za nekoga navijam iskreno.

[maheem]

Izdajniče, zapamtiću ti ovo!