April 21, 20196 yr 2 minutes ago, Gandalf said: Mueller's report said that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange "made several public statements" that implied Seth Rich leaked him the trove of DNC documents Pa jel' za ovo potreban Milerov izveštaj, valjda postoje neki zapisi o "javnim izjavama"?
April 21, 20196 yr Just now, zorglub said: Pa jel' za ovo potreban Milerov izveštaj, valjda postoje neki zapisi o "javnim izjavama"? https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-report-julian-assange-smeared-seth-rich-to-cover-for-russians Julian Assange repeatedly blamed Seth Rich, the murdered DNC staffer, for Russia’s leaks. The Mueller report shows that Assange was lying from the start. ... The most charitable interpretation of Assange’s “dissembling” as Mueller calls it, in the Seth Rich hoax was that he genuinely couldn’t rule out the possibility that Rich was his source. The Mueller report demolished that final moral refuge.
April 21, 20196 yr 1 hour ago, Gandalf said: https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-report-julian-assange-smeared-seth-rich-to-cover-for-russians Julian Assange repeatedly blamed Seth Rich, the murdered DNC staffer, for Russia’s leaks. The Mueller report shows that Assange was lying from the start. ... The most charitable interpretation of Assange’s “dissembling” as Mueller calls it, in the Seth Rich hoax was that he genuinely couldn’t rule out the possibility that Rich was his source. The Mueller report demolished that final moral refuge. Demolished Mueller se i dalje oslanja na Crowdstrike, ljude koji su plaćeni da svugde vide GRU. Apsolutno ništa na tom planu nije naveo. A to što citira privatne poruke WikiLeaks na Tviteru više šteti ideji da njihov info potiče od Rusa nego što joj doprinosi: “You announced your organization was preparing to publish more Hillary's emails,” (Assange wrote). “We are ready to support you. We have some sensitive information too, in particular, her financial documents. Let's do it together. What do you think about publishing our info at the same moment? Thank you.” 1 hour ago, zorglub said: Pa jel' za ovo potreban Milerov izveštaj, valjda postoje neki zapisi o "javnim izjavama"? Monstruozna™ javna izjava glasi: "We're very interested in anything that might be a threat to alleged Wikileaks sources. If there's someone who's potentially connected to our publication, and that person has been murdered in suspicious circumstances, it doesn't necessarily mean that the two are connected. But it is a very serious matter .. that type of allegation is very serious, as it's taken very seriously by us." Drugim rečima, Gandalf se i dalje ne skida sa tog pajpvida.
May 1, 20195 yr 9 minutes ago, Lezilebovich said: 50 nedelja zatvora za Asanza zbog neodazivanja na poziv suda. sramno napakovaće mu i naplatiti svašta
May 1, 20195 yr brate mili ne smem da se nerviram...cir ce da mi izleti... kakav je ovo prc u mozak i sve sto je moralno u ljudskoj vrsti. treba nas vaporizovati da ni pepeo ne ostane.
May 24, 20195 yr neka puse qrc! (ovo bes i ogorcenje i gadjenje iz mene govore) Edited May 24, 20195 yr by mustang
May 25, 20195 yr Šta su na kraju uradili sa Čelsi Mening? Vraćaju je u rupu na neodređeno? ...shiit has hit the fan...
May 25, 20195 yr 22 minutes ago, Frank Pembleton said: Šta su na kraju uradili sa Čelsi Mening? Vraćaju je u rupu na neodređeno? ...shiit has hit the fan... Ne znam da li se nesto dogadjalo u medjuvrenu. Ali Obama ju je pred kraj mandata pomilovao, ili kako vec prevodi commute. Jedino ako joj nesto novo ne nakace pa joj sude za to nesto drugo. Uzgred, od cele price sa Asanzom, zapracvo je najporaznije po Ameriku sto se toliko bavi samim Asanzom, odnosno njegovim cinom objave, a toliko malo onim sto je Asanz tom prilikom objavio. Edited May 25, 20195 yr by pacey defender
May 25, 20195 yr Nisi u toku, Pacey, pozvali su je pred grand jury koji se zaziva da bi pokrenuli optužnicu protiv Asanža, ona odbila da im izađe u susret i zaglavila pritvor. I nije na neodređeno, maksimalnih godinu i po dana za nesvedočenje protiv Asanža, plus bizarnih $500-$1,000 po danu. (Te finansijske mere prinude se obično izriču organizacijama jer je njih nemoguće staviti u pritvor, ali ovde su baš hteli maksimalni pritisak da izvrše.)
May 25, 20195 yr nije odbila da izadje u susret nego je zahtevala da bude saslusanje otvoreno za javnost jer ne veruje drzavi. drugo ona je vec pre izjavila sta je imala za wikileaks i zaglavila corku, uglavno samicu i sada kada bi bilo sta rekla mogla bi sebe ponovo da stavi u situaciju da joj se sudi za isto deli za koje je pardonirana. inace je izasla na 6 dana jer se jury nije sazvao pa sad opet...na 3 meseca a posle mogu da joj dizu novcanu kaznu
Create an account or sign in to comment