Ras Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 FAA je nastupio najbolje moguće, argumentovano i dovoljno diplomatski da saopšti i Drejperu i sudijama šta misli, a da ne bude vulgaran i ne upada u vatru. 4 Link to comment
Tsai Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Govance lazovsko. Vidi se iz aviona da laze smrad 1 Link to comment
utilitarist Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 veće su šanse da iskreno nije siguran. lik je na tren od velike pobede, drma ga ozbiljan stres, mozak u tim trenucima ne vlada sobom pa se kod čoveka granica između šta misli da se desilo i šta bi voleo da se desilo začaš izbriše. federer onomad isto nije bio siguran protiv mareja a verovatno mu je puls u tom trenutku bio niži a i sigurno bolje zna ponašanje loptice. 2 Link to comment
Jimmy Kowalski Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Igrac nije ni duzan da prizna, sve i da je siguran, a pogotovo ako ni sam nije. Sudija mora da to vidi i ovo je iskljucivo njegova bruka.. Link to comment
stray cat Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Da li je sudija mogao da pozove supervizora, da li je supervizor mogao da pogleda replay? Link to comment
Mindaugas Žukauskas Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 4 hours ago, Jimmy Kowalski said: Igrac nije ni duzan da prizna, sve i da je siguran, a pogotovo ako ni sam nije. Sudija mora da to vidi i ovo je iskljucivo njegova bruka.. Nikakav problem nemam ni sa tim da se Drejper povukao na svoju stolicu i rekao neka sudijska bude poslednja, neću ja da sudim. Ni prvi ni poslednji mućak koji hoće da pobedi po bilo koju cenu. Ono što je mene iznerviralo je, pored toga što si ispao mućak, i hoćeš da pobediš na prilično jadan način, takođe hoćeš sebe da predstaviš kao good guya, kojem ništa nije jasno, i šatro hoćeš da ponoviš poen. Da si hteo da ponoviš poen, priznao bi ono što si uradio, a vrlo je svestan toga, i to se vidi iz reakcije neposredno nakon što je odigrao udarac. 1 1 Link to comment
Jimmy Kowalski Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 https://www.tennis.com/baseline/articles/reaction-horrendous-double-bounce-controversy-match-point-draper-auger-aliassime-cincinnati-video-review Players are still chiming in on social media after a likely double-bounce on match point during the pair’s third-round clash went uncalled by chair umpire Greg Allensworth—handing Draper the point and a place in his first ATP Masters 1000 quarterfinal of the year. After dropping the opening set on Grandstand, Draper rallied back and was serving for the match against Auger-Aliassime at 5-7, 6-4, 5-4, 40-30. That’s when he appeared to mishit a half-volley into the ground, with the ball popping up and clipping the net before floating over to Auger-Aliassime’s side of the court. Both players appeared taken aback when Allensworth awarded the point, and the match, to Draper. Auger-Aliassime swiftly approached the chair to make his case. “That’s horrendous what you just did,” the Canadian railed. “Did you not see the ball bounce on the floor? He shanked it on the floor!” Despite Draper offering to replay the point multiple times throughout the ensuing discussion—one that grew to involv ATP Supervisor Roland Herfel arriving on court to mediate—Allensworth himself was unmoved. The chair umpire maintained that, because he didn’t see the double-bounce for himself, the point belonged to Draper. "You're going to get out now, and then (this clip) is going to be everywhere,” Auger-Aliassime predicted during the nearly five-minute discussion. “It's going to look ridiculous. It's going to be crazy." Although he may not have won the argument on Friday night, the cool-headed Canadian was right when he said the clip would be “everywhere.” Even while the discussion was still going on Grandstand, the controversy had already kicked off a flurry of debate on social media. Reigning Olympic champion Djokovic called the situation "embarrasing" and "ridiculous" as he took to X with his own plea to the ATP and WTA Tours to "make sure this nonsense never happens again": "It’s embarrassing that we don’t have video replay of these kind of situations on the court. What’s even more ridiculous is that we don’t have the rule in place that would allow chair umpires to change the original call based on the video review that happens off the court!" Djokovic wrote. "Everyone who watches TV sees what happened on the replay, yet the players on the court are kept in 'dark' not knowing what’s the outcome. We have Hawkeye for line calls, we live in the technologically advanced 21st century! "Please respective Tours, make sure this nonsense never happens again!" Coco Gauff's coach Brad Gilbert added that it's "beyond baffling" that supervisor Herfel upheld the call without reviewing the point—yet another product of the lack of a review system in the sport. "The fact that referee comes to court without looking at tape of the play is beyond baffling, so will just confirm umpires' decision, is egregious," Gilbert wrote. As players debated whether or not a double-bounce happened—and whether or not Draper, who immediately offered to replay the point, knew that it happened, too—WTA player Sloane Stephens pointed out that this was "two incidents in two tournaments" for chair umpire Allensworth. Earlier in the week, the American umpire was involved in a controversial call during No. 11 Fritz and Brandon Nakashima's first-round match. After a point was halted mid-rally by the automated system issuing a “stop, stop” call, Allensworth called a let and then informed Fritz that they would not replay the point because Fritz “didn’t stop the point in time”—despite the Cincy event not featuring a challenge system for players. The immediate outrage prompted the ATP to issue a swift change to the electronic line-calling rules, but for players including Stephens the fallout didn't go far enough. "Serious question: What consequences does the chair umpire face? This is two incidents in two tournaments for the same umpire," Stephens wrote on X. "Does he go on probation? No year end bonus? Can’t work the next Grand Slam? Fine? I’m genuinely curious." 1 1 Link to comment
Tsai Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Siner u finalu, Nolo 2. nosilac na US openu i zvanicno 3 Link to comment
TS-CS Posted August 19 Author Share Posted August 19 gledam reprizu i nevera kako Rune ovo nije dobio vidim da je prstalo i na Siner-Zveki Link to comment
nahbar Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 On 17. 8. 2024. at 19:08, utilitarist said: veće su šanse da iskreno nije siguran. lik je na tren od velike pobede, drma ga ozbiljan stres, mozak u tim trenucima ne vlada sobom pa se kod čoveka granica između šta misli da se desilo i šta bi voleo da se desilo začaš izbriše. federer onomad isto nije bio siguran protiv mareja a verovatno mu je puls u tom trenutku bio niži a i sigurno bolje zna ponašanje loptice. Eno Maradona je umro a da nikada nije shvatio... Link to comment
Serena Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) Edited September 26 by Serena 1 Link to comment
Serena Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Hurkac, branilac titule, se povukao iz Sangaja, bolovi u kolenu. Link to comment
Serena Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 Evo zreba za Sangaj Kako su ga bezveze napravili izgleda kao da se u trecem kolu srecu Novak i Sasa. Link to comment
W.F.C. Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 (edited) Greska Edited September 30 by W.F.C. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now