Teroristički napad u Parizu

[wall]

Bilo već.

To su neke elitne planinske™ jedinice a te beretke su ono tradicija i simbol raspoznavanja.

Ima smisla ako upekne minus pa je navuku i preko ušiju... Valjda.

[Weenie Pooh]

Koliko su široke, više ima smisla ako upekne plus - baca toliku senku da je celo uniformisano telo u hladovini,

 

Ili to, ili ova četvorica na slici imaju izrazito sitne glave.

[garcia]

Ima smisla ako upekne minus pa je navuku i preko ušiju... Valjda.

 

mogu da ih navuku do gleznjeva.

[bigvlada]

Ujeo sam se za jezik, neću opet da ih komentarišem.  :D

[vathra]

kod mene patroliraju Chasseurs Alpins, tu im je garnizon.

 

 

Је ли им то неки фазон да свако носи другачије беретку?

Код нас није било толико шаролико ни кад су тек почели да их носе, па их стављали први пут на главу.

 

Иначе велики плус што нико не држи прст на окидачу - добар знак да ће тешко да се деси неки инцидент са случајним опаљивањем.

[Prospero]

Valjda ga u gradskoj patroli drži pod "zakočeno".

[vathra]

Valjda ga u gradskoj patroli drži pod "zakočeno".

 

Пушка се увек третира као да је пуна и откочена.

Прст се ставља на окидач тек кад се нанишани.

Све остало је лутрија, а ако има доста наоружаних људи на улици шансе за погодак постају реалне.

[iDemo]

Пушка се увек третира као да је пуна и откочена.

 

Naravno. Mi smo to praktikovali cak i kad nam je sva municija bila za pojasom u kartonskoj kutiji, zapecacena+omotana lepljivom trakom... Znao se i u JeNeA neki red, dok je bila u mirnodoPskim uslovima (1983/4).

[Prospero]

Mislim da nije kačeno:

 

Averting France’s War of All Against All
If democracy can’t respond vigorously to terror threats, less savoury elements of society will fill the breach.



ENLARGE
French secret services DGSI general director Patrick Calvar in 2015. Photo: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images


By John Vinocur
July 18, 2016 3:43 p.m. ET


Patrick Calvar is France’s director general of domestic intelligence. Hedging seems not to fit in with his notion of the job.
“You will have a confrontation between the extreme right and the Muslim world—not the Islamists but, actually, the Muslim world,” he told a closed-door parliamentary hearing in May. His remarks were disclosed last week, two days before the Bastille Day terrorist truck attack that killed 84 people celebrating in Nice.

“The confrontation is inevitable,” said Mr. Calvar, who has referred to France as the Islamists’ central target but considers Europe in great danger. As reported by French media, he said the “radicalization of society and the deep movement it pulls along with it” is a greater threat than the terrorism he maintains will be defeated.

“One or two more attacks, and it will happen,” Mr. Calvar said, talking about “the confrontation between communities” that “all these groups . . . would like to set off.” This official horror scenario dwarfs in scope the three murderous attacks since January last year that have disabled France.

 

Excessive? Look at the Salafists (an estimated 15,000 among France’s five to seven million Muslims) whose radical-fundamentalist creed dominates many of the predominantly Muslim housing projects at the edges of cities such as Paris, Nice or Lyon. Their preachers call for a civil war, with all Muslims tasked to wipe out the miscreants down the street. At the same time, the right-wing extremists singled out by Mr. Calvar would be ideologically capable of shooting any Muslim.

Here is despair on top of despair. But the response of most French politicians reflects opportunism, evasion and petty finger pointing. The context is their dominating, intraparty squabbles leading to presidential primaries before the end of the year for the May 2017 elections.

The Nice attack contains a unique point of agreement: It represents the end of an epoch and the start of one in which France must come to terms with the near certainty of new tragedy and new victims. Socialist President François Hollande was quoted as saying over the weekend that, “Never since World War II have democracies been so threatened.” It’s reasonable today to add that France hasn’t appeared this dysfunctional and politically riven since 1939.

Hours before the Nice attack, on the afternoon of July 14, Mr. Hollande said new procedures now in place would allow the national state of emergency to be lifted by the end of the month—a clear electoral gesture to his left wing, which labeled the parliament-approved emergency period antidemocratic, hysterical and Islamophobic. At 3:45 a.m. the next morning, the president was on television to talk of France battling—attn. the White House—“Islamist terrorism” and “Salafism,” and to say the state of emergency would be maintained.

But Mr. Hollande hasn’t gotten around to explaining what everyday France continues to ask: how a 19-ton battering ram of a truck, driven by a Tunisian immigrant with a criminal record, got onto the seafront Promenade des Anglais, supposedly sealed to traffic by national and local police during a fireworks show.

Instead of urging national unity, typical calls by legislators from Nicolas Sarkozy’s conservative Republican Party have branded the government “autistic” and said the national police should have been armed with rocket launchers. The government has countered that it was in fact Mr. Sarkozy, during his five years as president, who reduced police forces under his control by 12,500.

Apropos, and targeting the entire French political class, the tabloid Le Parisien begged in a headline, “Please, A Little Decency.”
In a sense, none of this went to the biggest issue. Mr. Hollande has now climbed the ladder of reality to where he no longer describes France’s resident holy warriors as “obscurantists.” But he has done nothing to break the Islamic radicals’ hold, both psychic and practical, over the French Muslim communities where jihadism has taken root.

Following 18 months of terror, a big-bang compromise—a trade-off of job and educational advantages against a compact swearing Muslim adherence to the rules of French society—is inconceivable. Mr. Sarkozy, who once promised an affirmative-action program, but backed away from it while president, now demands Muslim “assimilation” rather than “integration.” As for the French Council of the Muslim Religion, a national Islamic grouping, it condemned the Nice attack without using the word terrorism.

France is in a bad place. Its uncertainty is palpable, its divisions knife-edged. And, as Mr. Calvar, the chief of domestic intelligence, has warned, its potential for violence is worse than its bloody present.

The country needs palpable help from its friends, including military support so that its troops in Africa can be reassigned at home.
Most of all, to right itself, France must deploy all the authority its democracy can tolerate for what Socialist Prime Minister Manuel Valls three months ago called the “reconquest” of the Republic “in the battle over culture and identity.”

 

[Dr Arslanagić]

Zanimljivo, veoma pazi da mu slučajno ne promakne da pomene da su desničari sposobni da ubijaju Muslimane, iako nijedan musliman nije ubijen u znak odmazde niti je džamija gorela, niti kebabdžinica demolirana.

 

Istovremeno, tip daje procene koliko ima u Francuskoj salafista. Procene jebote.

[hazard]

 niti je džamija gorela, 

 

A šta bi s ovim?

 

Naravno, čak i da jeste taj jedan incident, ne može se porediti sa onim šta rade teroristi.

[Hella]

švaba ciklonom be a mi lepo čakijom boc boc 

“He was walking home from the market after buying some things for the Sabbath and when he was by his house, someone came up to him and screamed ‘Allahu Akhbar’ and stabbed him,” said Samama, who is a rabbi based in Strasbourg.

https://www.rt.com/news/356472-france-rabbi-stab-strasbourg/

srećom po levičarčine 

Police say the incident is not terrorism-related and that the attacker is suffering from psychiatric issues.

Edited August 19, 2016 by Hella

[Hella]

u republici francuskoj krajini se takođe desio nalet motorizovanog alahuekberišućeg te mentalno obolelog kulturnog bogatstva kakav smo već videli u nici izraelu beču čepel hilu etc

 

On August 11, 2016, a woman shouting “Allah” drove over two officers from the Service de Police de la Ville de Montréal (Police Service of the City of Montreal), reported TVA Nouvelles.

 

The officers were standing outside a police station in North Montreal when the incident occurred.

 

“A lady in her 40’s made a dangerous driving manoeuvre at the police in Arrondissement de Montreal-Nord 39” said police commander Jonathan Martel.

 

The woman tried to speed away after hitting a police car. According to information obtained by TVA News, the woman reportedly shouted “Allah”.

 

“According to her behaviour and her words, one could think about an incident of a terrorist nature, but after investigation it was confirmed that there was no link to terrorist activity”, the commander assured.

 

The prosecutor requested a psychological evaluation of the woman who is facing charges of dangerous driving, assault and uttering threats. The woman remains in detention pending the investigation.

http://en.cijnews.com/?p=43551

Edited August 19, 2016 by Hella

[Krošek]

interesantno kako su mediji oziveli onaj siroti pojam stohastickog terorizma da ga primene na trampove govore, ali se nisu setili da ga uklope sa islamskim terorizmom, gde se jedino i uklapa

[Hella]

mediji oziveli onaj siroti pojam stohastickog terorizma da ga primene na trampove govore

 

ja ovo ič ne kontam a gugl je još gori

 

Stohastičke simulacije, pojednostavljeno napisano, prikazuju stvarnu varijabilnost kartirane regionalizirane varijable u podzemlju.