April 17, 20197 yr Odličan članak o zloupotrebi statistike. Na sličnu temu: http://www.twitter.com/justsaysinmice Edited April 17, 20197 yr by hazard
May 10, 20197 yr Циклус ФИЗИЧКА ХЕМИЈА – савремена питања и одговори (IV) http://www.kolarac.rs/predavanja/ciklus-fizicka-hemija-savremena-pitanja-i-odgovori-cetvrtkom-u-18/ Quote Физичка хемија и свет око нас Др Никола Вукелић, професор, Универзитет у Београду – Факултет за физичку хемију Четвртак, 16. 5. 2019. у 18:00 Антиоксидативна својства неуротрансмитера Др Душан Димић, асистент, Универзитет у Београду – Факултет за физичку хемију Четвртак, 23. 5. 2019. у 18:00 Примена електронске парамагнетне резонанције у биомедицини Др Александра Павићевић, асистент, Универзитет у Београду – Факултет за физичку хемију Четвртак, 30. 5. 2019. у 18:00 Мала сала, улаз слободан. Edited May 10, 20197 yr by miki.bg
September 2, 20232 yr Uuuu... zamalo jednom ne izumresmo (na kolektivni uzdah razočaranja svih ostalih vrsta.) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487 Edited September 2, 20232 yr by Indy
September 2, 20232 yr 37 minutes ago, Indy said: Uuuu... zamalo jednom ne izumresmo (na kolektivni uzdah razočaranja svih ostalih vrsta.) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487 Lichno teze mi je da zamislim da je vrsta opstala na 1000 jedinki u trajanju od 100 000 godina nego da se ide spejsshatlom na Mars.
September 15, 20232 yr Intermediate levels of scientific knowledge are associated with overconfidence and negative attitudes towards science https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01677-8 Nažalost, ceo rad je iza paywall.a
September 15, 20232 yr 19 minutes ago, Kenji said: U prevodu dunning kruger? zapravo ceo rad je kritika daning krugera, ali na tom je tragu. samo kazu da bolje procesuiraju rezultate sa "vecom rezolucijom" pa kad se tako analizira pocinje se videti nesto sto se dosad nije videlo. daning kruger je preizrazena samouverenost kod najnekompetentnijih koja se smanjuje sa nivoom kompetencije do tacke gde se kod najkompetentnijih moze govoriti o slaboj samouverenosti, a ovde se kaze da u stvari postoji preizrazena samouverenost ne kod najnekomptentnijih nego nelinearno tako da je zapravo najizrazenija u nekoj srednjoj grupi prema kompetenciji iz rada: Since the publication of the original Dunning–Krueger effect, the field has accumulated a large body of evidence and evolved to suggest a more nuanced pattern than the original proposal. For example, several studies indicate that the main tenet of the effect—that the unskilled are unaware of their lack of skill—might not be universal ... We find that, unlike what is suggested by previous work, overconfidence is not highest among the least knowledgeable but rather at intermediate-knowledge levels, ... To our knowledge, this nonlinear relationship between knowledge and confidence has not been described and cannot be predicted by the perfect-metacognition model /cisto teorijski, "idealizovan", model u kom samouverenost raste linearno sa znanjem/ nor the Dunning–Kruger effect. It is robust and does not require comparative scales. As binning might be a relevant problem, particularly for skewed distributions and for extreme knowledge bins, we suggested that the Dunning–Krueger effect could be hiding important variability, by often relying on quartiles. ...
September 15, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, Krošek said: ceo rad Na linku je samo rezime. Ovde ima više detalja: https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html (Ako neko ima pristup, možda bi ovde mogao da okači ceo rad). Koliko razumem (a govori mi i iskustvo) - napor da se složena materija uprosti za generalnu publiku mora da ide ruku od ruku sa jasnom ilustracijom toga koliko još toga ima da se nauči i sazna. Keep it simple, silly (KISS) ima svoje granice. Detalji su nejasni (bez pristupa radu, ne znamo metodologiju i definicije) - šta je tu "science" (postoje naravno veoma različite discipline - pomenuti Dunning Kruger se upravo manifestuje kao preterano samopouzdanje o oblastima van sopstvenog domena). Pominju se tamo i izvesni kulturni faktori, ali nema detalja. To mi je i najzanimljiviji deo (ako se neko seća šta sam pisao u januaru o mojim utiscima iz Srbije, možda će biti jasno i zašto.)
September 16, 20232 yr 9 hours ago, Indy said: Na linku je samo rezime. Ovde ima više detalja: https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html (Ako neko ima pristup, možda bi ovde mogao da okači ceo rad). Koliko razumem (a govori mi i iskustvo) - napor da se složena materija uprosti za generalnu publiku mora da ide ruku od ruku sa jasnom ilustracijom toga koliko još toga ima da se nauči i sazna. Keep it simple, silly (KISS) ima svoje granice. Detalji su nejasni (bez pristupa radu, ne znamo metodologiju i definicije) - šta je tu "science" (postoje naravno veoma različite discipline - pomenuti Dunning Kruger se upravo manifestuje kao preterano samopouzdanje o oblastima van sopstvenog domena). Pominju se tamo i izvesni kulturni faktori, ali nema detalja. To mi je i najzanimljiviji deo (ako se neko seća šta sam pisao u januaru o mojim utiscima iz Srbije, možda će biti jasno i zašto.) procitao sam ja ceo rad, imam pristup, ali ne smem da okacim
October 4, 20232 yr Odlican clanak o tome kako su mogi "naucni radovi zanimljivi za javnost" zapravo izmisljotine: Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino became famous for their research into why we bend the truth. Now they’ve both been accused of fabricating data. They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie? | The New Yorker
September 22, 2025Sep 22 Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia (Guest et al.)Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously to a) counter the technology industry's marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.Ceo rad je besplatan za download na https://zenodo.org/records/17065099
Create an account or sign in to comment