Prospero Posted May 22, 2014 Posted May 22, 2014 probudio sam se taman 3 minuta pred kraj 2/3 :D soft gol za smanjenje na 2:1, onda u 3/3 dva kvalitetna PP gola uz raspad hawksa. crawfordu je prošlo sve što je trebalo, quicku ni ovo nije moglo da prođe (hvala tofoliju za stick-save): edit: ne znam da okačim link :( nego: The Royal Half @theroyalhalf 2h“You know, if you lose this game you are that much closer to having to play in the World Championships.” - Darryl Sutter in between 1st/2nd
levi Posted May 25, 2014 Posted May 25, 2014 Rus, Fin, Swe Česima ni Michal Jordan nije pomogao za više od 4. mesta
Korki Posted May 25, 2014 Posted May 25, 2014 Русима то не значи баш много после катастрофе на ЗОИ. Французи најпријатније изненађење, Канађани непријатно. Ипак су били НХЛ играчи.
Prospero Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 Zašto zabušavate s praćenjem ECF & WCF, jel' bre? :)
malkin Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 ja sam u standardnoj prolećnoj depresiji nakon ispadanja iz plejofa, nije mi do hokeja :( obećavam da ću opet da pratim ako Montreal dobije šestu.
Prospero Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 Ja bih naširoko pisao kako su kingsi jebači nad jebačima i kako "that '70s line" kida nesrećne hawks-e al' mi glupo da ih izbaksuziram pred utakmicu #5. :D Red je da otaljaju bar jednu seriju pre utakmice #7.
malkin Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 zna se, je li, da je četvrtu najteže dobiti. gledao sam LA samo protiv pataka i stvarno su opako delovali. kako god da obrneš, biće odlično finale za NHL--em super timovi em velika tv tržišta. LA-NY bi bilo baš zanimljivo, ne pamtim kad su igrali finale neke od pro liga. ali ipak bih voleo Habse u finalu, vreme im je posle toliko godina.
Prospero Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 upravo, za nhl je svaka kombinacija za finale odlična, može da se priča o "original six" finalu, ili o LA-NY, ili montrealu koji je naj-naj ikad i sada ponovo dobio šansu itd itd.
malkin Posted May 29, 2014 Posted May 29, 2014 kad samo pomislim da sam razmišljao da menjam nick... :lol: :ziga: i naravno:
Prospero Posted May 29, 2014 Posted May 29, 2014 Ja bih naširoko pisao kako su kingsi jebači nad jebačima i kako "that '70s line" kida nesrećne hawks-e al' mi glupo da ih izbaksuziram pred utakmicu #5. :D fuck me :(
Prospero Posted May 29, 2014 Posted May 29, 2014 na par mesta danas videh "najbolji OT period ikada" komentar za sinoćnu utakmicu, pa evo nekakva analiza, koga ne mrzi da čita: Blackhawks, Kings give us the best overtime hockey we've ever seenBy Travis Hughes @TravisSBN on May 29 2014, 1:35p David Banks-USA TODAY Sports The Blackhawks and Kings gave us some of the best hockey we've ever seen -- and no, that's not an exaggeration -- in overtime of Game 5 on Wednesday night.At the start of overtime Wednesday night, my hockey-illiterate roommate came home and sat down on the living room couch."How are the playoffs going?" he asked. I probably didn't have to answer him, because the TV was about to do the talking for me. But I explained how the Kings came back from 0-3 down in Round 1, and how the Blackhawks are the defending champs, and how crazy Game 5 that night had been to that point. It was a quick 30-second primer, because overtime was about to start.And man, did he sit on that couch at the right time. For the next 26 minutes, from 9:57 p.m. Chicago time to 10:23 p.m., the Blackhawks and Kings went up and down and back and forth in what was definitely the most exciting period of NHL hockey in these playoffs. It might have been the best ever, period.The pace was simply incredible, as evidenced by the fact that they played a 20 minute period in just 26 minutes. I'm not sure if that's a record, but it's gotta be close.Patrick Kane agrees."I thought it was an unbelievable period," Kane said. "Up and back the whole period. A lot of chances. I think we probably had more chances than they did in overtime, but a lot of times you thought the game was over, especially for us."So it was a really fun period to play in. I know they clean the ice there at 10 minutes -- I don't think they ended up cleaning it till like 3:50 or something on the clock. Not a lot of whistles. Just up and back. It was a fun period of happy.A fun period of happy. Pretty astute, Kaner. Joel Quenneville echoed it:"I've seen a lot of games, been involved in a lot of games," Quenneville said. "That might have been the greatest overtime I've seen. When they had the whistle there, basically the timeout in the first overtime there, I don't know how many minutes and seconds, but it was just like it was a 'wow' factor."I think I appreciated it. The guys were working. The pace was unbelievable. It was good action. I guess maybe had a little appreciation when there was a stoppage in play."That timeout for ice cleaning both men referenced came with 3:23 remaining in the overtime period. Prior to that whistle, the teams had played without stop for 7 minutes, 53 seconds. There were 11 shot attempts by the Kings in that span and seven by the Blackhawks. There were six hits and two takeaways registered, one for each team.Here are a few clips tossed together from that stretch. Take these seconds and imagine that intensity for nearly a half hour straight, and you'll get a sense for what watching this OT was like.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sTaH1Yzx1A All told in the 20 minute overtime period, there were just eight stoppages: Jonathan Quick covered the puck three times, a shot went up into the netting behind the goal three times, into the bench once, one icing call and one offside call. Compare that with 18 stoppages in the third period, 16 in the second and 24 in the first.This right here is why we say that the Stanley Cup Playoffs are the best playoffs in sports. This is why we all watch hockey, and this is what sells the game of hockey to new people. It's not goals, necessarily. It's not saves or strong defensive play. It's that tempo. It's the pace of the game.Joe Yerdon @JoeYerdonPHTFollowThat OT a prime example of why pace is the most vital part to excitement in hockey. Goals are fun, but that pace sells. Jon Bois ✔@jon_boisFollowwhy watch overtime playoff hockey when you can simply snort cocaine and ride a motorcycle out of a helicopter It could have been different. The Kings had nothing to lose, really, playing with house money in a game where they erased a two-goal deficit in the first period. Their backs weren't against the wall, and it made sense that they would push the pace and go all out in an attempt to score first.The Blackhawks were in a bit of a different situation, though, and while they're not a team that sits back and clogs up the ice, nobody would have blamed them if they were playing a bit more cautious, given that one mistake could have cost them their season.Often times in these situations, the team that sits back gets burned for it. That's the essence of what the NHL has created since the 2004-05 lockout -- this overtime period is probably a lot different, a lot slower and a lot more boring without the rule changes we've seen over the last nine years.The Blackhawks were not in a position to sit back and let the game come to them, because doing so would have been riskier than pushing the play.That's what the NHL has created, and it arguably makes the game better than it's ever been.Of course, these are human people, and they can't keep this up forever. During the intermission before the second overtime period, we all sat there with a feeling that this couldn't possibly keep up much longer.It wasn't going to be a three or four OT contest. Teams don't get this many chances without converting one of them, especially not when those teams are the Blackhawks and the Kings, and not when the goaltenders are ... well, quite mediocre, as Jonathan Quick and Corey Crawford have been in these playoffs. Extra Skater That's the curse of what makes fast-paced, nonstop overtime so exciting: by default, it has to end relatively quickly, because mistakes happen and the defense and goaltending aren't going to hold up through all of those chances. Sometimes, Mike Richards, one of the better defensive forwards in the league, loses 37-year-old-with-four-regular-season-goals Michal Handzus in coverage, and the game ends.It had to end eventually. We're lucky we got 22 minutes of that mayhem in Game 5, and as the Blackhawks and Kings prepare for an encore on Friday night, we can only hope for something similar. I have a feeling my previously hockey-illiterate roommate will be there on the couch with me.
malkin Posted May 30, 2014 Posted May 30, 2014 e šteta što me sinoć mrzelo da komentarišem, mogao sam da ispadnem pametan... gledao sam produžetak i stvarno je hokej bio boles'. Malkine, sta cekas sa promenom avatara? :D sređeno!
Prospero Posted May 31, 2014 Posted May 31, 2014 hawksi su sinoć u 3/3 cela 3 puta šutnuli ka golu, i 2 puta pogodili
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now