November 1, 201411 yr ne, nego ne smes da odgovoris na to pitanje jer ti nijedan odgovor ne ide u prilog.
November 1, 201411 yr Kako izgleda, ovde pojedine sagovornike posebno iritira stav crkve prema homoseksualizmu pa kao posledicu imamo iskakanja koja otezavaju komunikaciju. Asocijacija koju nije moguce okarakterisati kao "jednu od mnogih ex-gay, religioznih ili parareligioznih" National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) http://www.narth.com Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI) and the NARTH Institute and Homosexuality Is homosexuality essentially genetically or biologically determined? Can change or growth happen in a person's sexual orientation? What is the ethical basis for offering change options to people with unwanted homosexual attractions? Is the Alliance or the NARTH Institute a religious organization? Does ethical, clinically licensed sexual orientation change therapy (SOCE) harm people? Is the Alliance (ATCSI) an anti-gay hate group? What is the Alliance's stance on bullying? Do NARTH Institute therapists advocate the use of aversion or shock therapy? Why are the Alliance and the NARTH Institute so opposed by some gay activists? Are there increased psychological and physical health risks associated with homosexual behavior? Does the Alliance working through the NARTH Institute offer therapeutic services? I heard that Sexual orientation change was discredited by the American Psychological Association? What about the 2009 APA task force on Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE)? Does the Alliance (ATCSI) or the NARTH Institute advocate reparative therapy? What is homophobia? Is the Alliance (ATCSI) homophobic? What does research reveal about homosexual parenting? What would the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity like others to know about its organization?
November 1, 201411 yr Author Tu organizaciju mozemo nazvati skupom zlocinackog olosa koji, pored ostalog, brani ropstvo. Edited November 1, 201411 yr by Грешни Василије
November 1, 201411 yr Author pa lepo, to je bolje za divljake :) A prominent member of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) is under fire for publishing an essay in which he argues that Africans were fortunate to have been sold into slavery and that the civil rights movement was "irrational." "There is another way, or other ways, to look at the race issue in America," writes Gerald Schoenewolf, a member of NARTH's Science Advisory Committee. "Africa at the time of slavery was still primarily a jungle … Life there was savage … and those brought to America, and other countries, were in many ways better off." Edited November 1, 201411 yr by Грешни Василије
November 1, 201411 yr Odlazimo daleko od teme a i nesto ne bih da budem drveni advokat...ali nazvati citavu asocijaciju skupom zlocinackog olosa. NARTH received criticism from the Southern Poverty Law Center for an essay titled Gay Rights and Political Correctness: A Brief History, and written by Gerald Schoenewolf, a member of NARTH's Science Advisory Committee. SPLC called it an angry polemic that made outrageous historical claims. The article had drawn a letter of protest from the National Black Justice Coalition a year after its publication. A month later, NARTH removed the article from its website and posted a statement of apology. A later statement from NARTH said that SPLC had mis-labeled Schoenewolf as "ex-gay" and had made other erroneous claims about his essay. Mislio sam da je moguce razgovarati o temi homoseksualizma kroz prizmu hriscanstva, uzrocima, uticajima, genetici, epigenetici ali nesto nam ne ide.
November 1, 201411 yr Author Odlazimo daleko od teme a i nesto ne bih da budem drveni advokat...ali nazvati citavu asocijaciju skupom zlocinackog olosa. NARTH received criticism from the Southern Poverty Law Center for an essay titled Gay Rights and Political Correctness: A Brief History, and written by Gerald Schoenewolf, a member of NARTH's Science Advisory Committee. SPLC called it an angry polemic that made outrageous historical claims. The article had drawn a letter of protest from the National Black Justice Coalition a year after its publication. A month later, NARTH removed the article from its website and posted a statement of apology. A later statement from NARTH said that SPLC had mis-labeled Schoenewolf as "ex-gay" and had made other erroneous claims about his essay. Mislio sam da je moguce razgovarati o temi homoseksualizma kroz prizmu hriscanstva, uzrocima, uticajima, genetici, epigenetici ali nesto nam ne ide. ne mozemo razgovarati drugacije o organizaciji koja ima za cilj lecenje, tj. konverziju homoseksualaca, to je legitimizovanje monstruoznih i necivilizacijskih ideja koje je pristojan deo sveta odbacio zauvek. ma drugih foruma na kojima su ideje o lecenju homoseksualaca prihvatljive. Edited November 1, 201411 yr by Грешни Василије
November 1, 201411 yr ako uzmes za polaznu tacku da im se cini usluga u vidu prevencije pakla, to jest, ako poverujes u taj mindfuck, onda jebiga ima smisla. Edited November 1, 201411 yr by Zhota
November 1, 201411 yr ne mozemo razgovarati drugacije o organizaciji koja ima za cilj lecenje, tj. konverziju homoseksualaca A da li mozemo razgovarati o uticaju epi-markera, to se delom uklapa u teoriju nasledjivanja? http://ilsimplicissimus2.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/homosexuality.pdf Ukratko, homoseksualac se postaje kada neuobicajeno jaki epi-markeri prezive brisanje i spare se s neuobicajeno slabim novim epi-markerima suprotnog spola.
Create an account or sign in to comment