harper lee Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Just now, Tsai said: Znaci to je to? Ja vec spremio mejlove da drukam mog drugara advokata. Kad bude zvanicno samo da kliknem send.
Ros Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 koji moj citava frka oko sudjenja i sve ovo ako je dovoljan ministrov common-sense
Redoran Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 9 minutes ago, Peter Fan said: Bio sam prekinuo pracene ne samo to, vec je all star lawyer napravio unforced error: The chief justice, James Allsop, has just intervened to make an observation that is very helpful for the immigration minister’s case. Djokovic’s lawyers have been focused on the lack of “evidence” before Alex Hawke of the impact of his presence in Australia. Alsop said: The word evidence shouldn’t mislead. What is really necessary is material before a decision-maker, which material includes the rational and reasonable use of perception and common-sense, in the place the decision-maker is in. One needs to be careful when speaking about evidence in the sense of litigation... Before a decision-maker, it’s the legitimacy of the material before [them] and whether or not it is of sufficient character including what can be drawn from common-sense and the perception of the minister to matters relevant in the community.” So, Allsop is saying the minister is entitled to rely on his common-sense. That’s a big blow for Djokovic’s case. Djokovic’s lawyers accepted that statement of the law. Nisam baš siguran da je napravio neiznuđenu, on je sve vreme bukvalno osporavao ministrov common sense. Nema šta drugo da napada jbg. Sistem je dizajniran da pogura državu a ne imigranta.
roux senyurt Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 sudeci po nacinu na koji drzava brani odluku da sutnu nola, a to je da u principu ministra boli kita i da moze da izbaci nekoga iz zemlje zato sto mu smrdi iz usta, ovo je gotova stvar. jeste vikend i ne mora se sutra ustajati rano, ali mogao sam odgledati neki film umesto ovog sudskog sranja. 1
Tsai Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Mene ubedjuje ortak koji je pravnik da ovo nije gotovo , ja ugasio
Ros Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Just now, Valkyrie said: Ma ko ga jebe, što se nije vakciniso hteo je, ali se onda se desio slucaj sa chardijem jab' tako rek'o
Stari tenis fan Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Treci sudija je postavi dosta neugodno pitanje Lojdu, nesto u stilu sto jen razumno sto je nerazumno. Loje na jednom mjestu reako nezto u stilu da ministar ne mora nista da obrazlozi, ali da ne smije biti nerazuman.
Ted Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 naravno da nije gotovo. i to što je neko ovlašćen da donese odluku na osnovu zdravog razuma ne znači da mu je svaka odluka zdravorazumska niti da je oslobođen obaveze da njegova odluka zasnovana na činjenicama koje su realne problem je što mi ne znamo sudsku praksu Australije i kako oni tumače određene pravne standarde, do koje mere može ili ne može da se širi sadržina nekog standarda sve će ovo da se svede ne pitanje dal se ministar kretao u granicama ovlašćenja ili ih je prekoračio kad se ovo nastavlja?
Ros Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 imam osecaj da je wood rusio argumente vlade, znajuci kakav ce biti odgovor, pa ce onda da krene u napad. kao da ga je namamio. videcemo
Milošica Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Ja rešio ovo učenje. Jel dobio Novak četvrti set u međuvremenu? Vidim Aca namučeno izgleda.
Stari tenis fan Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Ne razumijem pravni aspekt, ali logicki je Wood u pravu: "Djokovic ce vise biti ikona antivaksera ako ga deportuju nego ako ga ostave!" On je ponudio dokaze za to!
Ros Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 andrews je mrtav hladan izjavio: "Biće fantastično ovde sa publikom, sigurnom od Kovida. Biće drugačije, ali biće i dobro. To nam je važno za ekonomiju, poslove, turizam, naš brend...". sigurnom od Kovida??????
harper lee Posted January 16, 2022 Posted January 16, 2022 Ono sto je meni posebno odvratno je sto zamisljam koliko je samo ovakvih slucajeva proslo bez ovolikog prisustva javnosti i koliko je ljudi do sada na ovakav nacin proterano. Nisam pravnik i ne znam nista o tome ali za mene je ovo skandal prvog reda, North Korea level. 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now