To, mačko!

[Budja]

59 minutes ago, Moracikus said:

A da.

Sad je ScoMo kriv sto se ovaj bolid nije vakcinisao i donio potvrdu o prelezanoj bolesti ovjerenu od strane Nestora i M.Petrovica

 

U, najnoviji obrt.

 

Sctott Morrison bot na forumu!

Laburisti vs liberali

 

Gde je Noskich sada?

 

[Tsai]

4 minutes ago, Budja said:

 

Gde je Noskich sada?

 

 

 

[vememah]

 

[Tsai]

Kapiram te ljude skroz.

Kljako je napravio sranje sto je objavio da je dobio izuzece

[Bogotac]

Ovaj klip,jos jedan dokaz kakva nepismena stoka su ljudi i kako ih je lak strpati u jedan tor.

 

Oduzeli mi slobodu,nista,daj da se to svima uradi po svaku cenu,jer nemoc.

[Gojko & Stojko]

 

U međuvremenu je u Heraldu izašao i tekst mog omiljenog sportskog komentatora, bivšeg igrača ragbija Pitera Ficsimonsa, čiji tekst o Đokoviću sam ovde pominjao i pre nekoliko meseci kad se Fic dohvatio i jugoslovenske vakcinacije protiv velikih boginja 1972. (ne znajući koliko je bila sveobuhvatna, ali neko mu je u komentarima na to ukazao, zašta je sam dodao da je fascinantna koincidencija).

 

Što se mene tiče sve je u pravu, potrvđuje ono što sam i ja govorio, tj. da je u pitanju backflip savezne vlade nakon reakcije javnosti (onog istog dripca Skota Morisona kome je Makron u Glazgovu pred australijskim novinarima opalio takav figurativan šamar nazivajući ga lažovom ne trepnuvši od koga se Morison danima pušio):

Border farce: Door should have been closed to Djokovic weeks ago

Sporting and political debacles don’t come much bigger, louder or more global in interest.

 

For months, the issue of whether Novak Djokovic, the world’s No.1 tennis player and anti-vaxxer, would be able to come to the Australian Open has been simmering away in the background. The first grand slam of the year is, after all, held in the state with the toughest history of lockdowns in the world, where the people have made extraordinary sacrifices to keep the population as healthy as possible. And he was meant to just waltz on in, be the exception to the rule, just because he could hit a ball well?

 

Both the Victorian and federal governments seemed to be in agreement that, unless he had either been vaccinated or held a fair dinkum medical exemption, then he could not ...

 

Until on Tuesday night, the Serb gleefully announced on Instagram that he had been granted an “exemption permission” and was on his way Down Under. Twitter went into meltdown, talkback outrage went round the clock and letters to the editor universally excoriating him were dispatched.

 

The dénouement came on Wednesday night.

 

Djokovic pretty much had his visa torn up in front of him, or at least was firmly told by Border Force that while his medical exemption – reportedly on grounds of having had COVID-19 in the last six months – might satisfy the two independent bodies appointed by Tennis Australia, it didn’t, (sniff), satisfy them.

 

The result is Djokovic is now reportedly in a Melbourne quarantine hotel exploring his legal options, while he and Australia jointly make blaring headlines around the world.

 

A precedent for this?

 

There is none, bar the one pointed out by a wag on Twitter, that “it was an unvaccinated Serbian who started the First World War”.

 

Who is to blame for the whole imbroglio?

 

I would start with Djokovic himself. When they hold the World Dickhead Olympics, he would be my pick for the gold medallist. All this palaver, all this carry-on, all this angst and hate coming his way, all because of resisting a tiny prick in your arm? Please.

 

“Just get vaccinated, ya knob,” noted another of the Twitterati, speaking, in my view, for most of Australia.

 

Not for nothing does the 34-year-old, who has won nine Australian Open titles and a record-equalling 20 grand slams, have just about no support in this country.

 

In a Twitter poll conducted by your humble correspondent, out of about 5000 respondents, only 5 per cent or so think he should be let out of the hotel and allowed to play after all – coincidentally, about the same number of people in this country who are anti-vax nutters.

 

And yet it is not only Djokovic at fault here. More than 60 per cent of the same Twitter poll agrees that Australia itself looks ordinary.

 

Djokovic is the most public unvaccinated figure in the world right now, and nothing has changed in his vaccination status in the past few weeks. How is it that Tennis Australia, the Victorian state government and the Australian federal government have failed to come to a firm position on whether he could or could not come? Was it really OK to allow him on to a plane in the first place, and stop him only once he touched down at Tullamarine?!

 

And what is worse?

 

It doesn’t feel as if the law is being applied without fear or favour, but that politics is at play. The acting Victorian Sports Minister, Jaala Pulford, told the ABC on Thursday morning that the Victorian state government was approached by no less than three federal government agencies seeking support for Djokovic’s visa bid.

 

And yet since the news came out, the outcry against Djokovic coming has been so great that the usual suspects seem to be vying for the lead in the political theatre to stop him, led by the PM himself.

 

“Rules are rules,” he tweeted rather piously on Thursday morning, “especially when it comes to our borders. No one is above these rules.”

 

Fine. But if he was in clear breach of those rules, it was the job of those federal agencies, surely, to point that out a few weeks ago?

 

For beyond all that, this was not someone more anonymous than a wrong number trying to slip though the net – Fault! – only to be caught by a vigilant customs officer at the airport: “’Ello, ’ello, ’ello, what have we got here?” This was, I repeat thrice now, the most famous anti-vaxxer in the world who, despite everything, appeared to have been granted permission to come.

 

And it was only when the public outcry was so great that the politicians took centre stage, preening at his expulsion.

The right result was achieved.

 

“Novak, Novax, Novisa,” one tweet summed it up beautifully.

 

It just should have been made clear weeks ago, not at five minutes to midnight at Tullamarine.

 

SaE

[reg]

 

[ObiW]

5 hours ago, cedo said:

 

Ali seljazamot. 

 

Jedna flaša vinjaka za  bumera što je sročio.

[Micko8]

Australija je shit hole  country, nista dobro odatle nikada nije stiglo ( osim  benda Rose Tattoo  )

Edited January 6, 2022 by Micko8

[kralj]

Do sad bar nisu slali antivaksere.

[reg]

Izgleda da je TA zeznula stvar.

novak-djokovic-letter_1_cdmwgfntk-jpg.374180.avif

 

 

Edited January 6, 2022 by boldrock

[Tsai]

Realno moze da odere TA na sudu

 Idioti

[Redoran]

Za pobačene pokušaje humora sa interneta imamo prikladnu temu dole južno. Ovde se diskutuje.

[reg]

30 minutes ago, Tsai said:

Realno moze da odere TA na sudu

 Idioti

 

Nisam siguran da je samo do njih, neverovatno mi je da nije imao tim zadužen za upravo ovakve situacije kojih će biti dosta ove godine. Nepoznavanje prava škodi.

 

https://www.news.com.au/sport/tennis/novak-djokovic-legal-stoush-starts-after-his-visa-to-enter-australia-was-cancelled/news-story/c39aa1406e161dd6200c2241d733b612

 

neko na MTF-u je stavio live update sa sajta heralda.

Quote

 

Novak Djokovic’s legal challenge against his visa cancellation has begun in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

Lawyers for the tennis star and for the Immigration Minister faced Judge Anthony Kelly, who called for more documentation before standing down the case until 4pm.

It remains to be seen whether the Minister will give an undertaking not to deport Djokovic, or if the tennis ace’s legal team will press for an injunction halting his cancelled visa until he can appeal.

The online court heard an application and affidavit was yet to be filed and relied on by the court.

During a brief mention, Judge Kelly said he was yet to hear legal arguments over the cancelled visa, but said that “Australia’s laws entitle it to grant or refuse visas depending upon whether criteria are met or not met.”

“If they’re not met the minister has no discretion, the visa application must be refused.”

 

 

Djokovic has made a substantive application for a judicial review of a migration decision of a delegate of the minister of home affairs — essentially the call by a border force staffer not to enter the country.

 

Judge Kelly questioned when Djokovic was required before the Australian Open tournament, which begins on January 17, and asked whether there were tennis courts he could practise at while staying at the quarantine hotel.

 

Those questions have not yet been answered.

 

Judge Kelly offered for the court to sit beyond normal hours to deal with Djokovic’s application.

 

The tennis ace is being represented by barristers Nick Wood SC and Paul Holdenson QC, while Immigration Minister Alex Hawke is being represented by barrister Christopher Tran.

 

The matter will return to court this afternoon.

 

Djokovic might not be the only tennis ace facing an uncertain future, with reports two other players were granted exemption letters which don’t meet Australian government entry requirements.

 

A judge has warned lawyers for Novak Djokovic that the “tail won’t be wagging the dog” as they urged the court to decide his fate before the Australian Open draw.

The tennis ace’s deportation hearing returned to the Federal Circuit and Family Court on Thursday afternoon, where barrister Nick Wood SC said Tennis Australia would need to know by Tuesday whether Djokovic could play.

He said for “scheduling purposes” if Djokovic wasn’t playing, the tennis competition would need to “fill the gap”.

But Judge Anthony Kelly returned serve, replying: “The tail won’t be wagging the dog here.”

“If Tennis Australia decides to do what it wants to do in running its enterprise, it will,” Judge Kelly said.

He said all he could do was assist lawyers for Djokovic and the Immigration Minister Alex Hawke to resolve the case in the “best way possible”.

A decision by Tennis Australia whether or not to scratch a player wasn’t relevant to the court, he said.

A final hearing over Djokovic’s application was set to be held on Monday morning, the court was told.


Mr Wood said only his client “knows the true facts ... about what happened” and said he was seeking information from him to assist with the application.

Judge Kelly said he was yet to receive the documents he needed to hear the case, and delayed the matter again to 6pm. - That's in 1hr from this posting time

Barrister Christopher Tran, for the minister, said there were three options: for the minister to not oppose the injunction relief which would halt Djokovic’s deportation until a final hearing on Monday; to deport Djokovic tonight or tomorrow morning meaning Judge Kelly would have to make a ruling tonight; or to deport the tennis star at a later date but before the Monday hearing so as a judicial order did not have to be made on Thursday.

The matter returns to court at 6pm.

 

[keitel]

Sve je to bilo toliko jasno od prvog momenta. Mogućnost izbora zaista postoji, ali to nije izbor da li ćeš primiti vakcinu ili ne, već da li ćeš nastaviti igračku ili početi šamansku karijeru. Ne govorimo ovde o učinkovitosti vakcina već o nekim univerzalnim pravilima koja moraju da se poštuju. 

Nemoguće da Đoković nije imao sluha za sve što se dešavalo u Australiji u poslednje dvije godine, uostalom, već je bio tamo, zna kako sve to izgleda i kako se oni odnose prema pandemiji. Svaljivati odgovornost na političare je uvijek opcija, ali oni su samo glas naroda.

 

U mojim očima bi povratio dio ljudske veličine ako bi javno poručio razuzdanom Srđanu da jede govna. Naravno, od toga nema ništa, a plašim se da ne ode u drugu krajnost i da ne prihvati ono što sad velika grupa ljudi očekuje: da bude ikona antivakserskog pokreta, ne samo u Srbiji.

Edited January 6, 2022 by keitel