Quote

Gov. Kay Ivey: Putting faith first

My faith has always come first for me. From my earliest days on our family farm in lower Alabama, to my teenage years when I accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior, and every single day since. That’s why as Governor, protecting religious freedom, and our values, remains my top priority. And make no mistake: our Christian values are under attack.

This week as Alabamians across the state gathered together to celebrate Easter with friends and family, I was reminded of the unique rights and freedoms the Constitution provide for us to openly express our faith.

These freedoms, however, shouldn’t be taken for granted; They did not come freely, and we must remain vigilant to preserve this precious liberty.

Nearly a year ago, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution, and as your Governor, I’ve stood strong in my commitment.

When I accepted Christ as my Savior, I made a decision to follow Jesus and allow him to be Lord of my life. I understand first hand that faith in God is more than a set of beliefs, it’s a way of life. No law or government should ever stand in the way of that walk of faith.
As Governor, I am dedicated to ensuring your religious freedom is protected regardless of where you are – whether at church, your home or place of business. But we haven’t stopped there.

We know that an attack on a fellow American’s faith is an attack on our own, which is why Alabama joined together with other states to defend the right of every American to live out their faith.

As a pro-life conservative, I believe our Constitutional rights begin at conception. Fighting for our freedoms also means fighting to defend the unborn.

That’s why I supported President Trump’s action to rollback Obama-era regulations and stop the use of taxpayer money to pay for abortions. Prohibiting the use of Medicaid dollars for abortions or abortion-related services is another important step towards saving the unborn, and I will continue to defend those who can’t defend themselves.

Religious liberty is a founding principle of our nation, and as your Governor, I am working every day to protect those rights.

 

Je l moze pitanje za Hemmera:

 

How did you feel about Ken Starr in the 90s?

 

i onda 

How do you feel about Mueller today?

 

 

Cenim da bi odgovor bio "nije to isto".

 

 

 

 

Naravno da moze pitanje za Hemmera. Aki, koja je poenta takvog pitanja? Narocito ako znas da neces dobiti odgovor, pa onda pretpostavis kakav ce odgovor biti i tako ga uhvatis u nekonzistentnosti.

 

Sta je cilj? Da se uhvati tv voditelj u nekonzistentnosti? 

 

Rand Paul je elected official. On je duzan da polaze racune javnosti. Novinar je tu da postavi pitanje. Taj izvesni Hemmer ne duguje nikome odgovore na bilo kakva pitanja, niti njegova pretpostavljena, eventualna, ucitana nekonzistentnost ama bas nista ne govori o konkretnom blamu senatora Paula. 

1 hour ago, pacey defender said:

Naravno da moze pitanje za Hemmera. Aki, koja je poenta takvog pitanja? Narocito ako znas da neces dobiti odgovor, pa onda pretpostavis kakav ce odgovor biti i tako ga uhvatis u nekonzistentnosti.

 

Sta je cilj? Da se uhvati tv voditelj u nekonzistentnosti? 

 

Rand Paul je elected official. On je duzan da polaze racune javnosti. Novinar je tu da postavi pitanje. Taj izvesni Hemmer ne duguje nikome odgovore na bilo kakva pitanja, niti njegova pretpostavljena, eventualna, ucitana nekonzistentnost ama bas nista ne govori o konkretnom blamu senatora Paula. 

 

U pravu si za Paula, ali nisam siguran za Hemmera.

 

Da li bi pitao nesto slicno Nancy Pelosi u vezi Starr-a?

 

 

In another news.

 

 

Kako popraviti imidz?

Blame Russians!

 

Quote

Zuckerberg: Facebook is in 'arms race' with Russia

 

13 hours ago, pacey defender said:

Naravno da moze pitanje za Hemmera. Aki, koja je poenta takvog pitanja?

''Pitanje za Hemmera'' je klasični Russia Today trope. Budja demonstrira sirovu kvalitetu autogenog treninga u tome.

13 hours ago, Budja said:

 

U pravu si za Paula, ali nisam siguran za Hemmera.

 

Da li bi pitao nesto slicno Nancy Pelosi u vezi Starr-a?

 

 

Možda. Verovatno ne. I? Fox nedosledan? Ok. Šta da radimo sa tom informacijom?

13 hours ago, Budja said:

In another news.

 

 

Kako popraviti imidz?

Blame Russians!

 

Skočile im akcije = svedočenje uspešno.

 

Najdebilnije pitanje: "Da li je u Cambridge Analytica situaciji postojala opasnost da ti podaci koje ste im dozvolili da prikupe dospeju Rusima u šake?"  

6 hours ago, pacey defender said:

Možda. Verovatno ne. I? Fox nedosledan? Ok. Šta da radimo sa tom informacijom?

 

Nije utilitarnost svake informacije direktna.

 

Sa tom informacijom mozemo da apdejtujemo (fali mi srpska rec, ne mogu da se setim) nasa verovanja (priors, beliefs) u sledecem smislu:

Medij za koga XY radi je pristrasan, dakle, moja vera u taj medij u vezi drugih informacija ce se smanjiti.

 

 

15 hours ago, Budja said:

 

Nije utilitarnost svake informacije direktna.

 

Sa tom informacijom mozemo da apdejtujemo (fali mi srpska rec, ne mogu da se setim) nasa verovanja (priors, beliefs) u sledecem smislu:

Medij za koga XY radi je pristrasan, dakle, moja vera u taj medij u vezi drugih informacija ce se smanjiti.

 

 

Pa dobro, to kakav je Fox, to smo znali

Edited April 12, 20188 yr by pacey defender

3 hours ago, pacey defender said:

Pa dobro, to kakav je Fox, to smo znali

 

Upravo.

Stoga nije rec o Fox i MSNBC vec ostalim msm.

Hypocrisy=GOP™

https://twitter.com/KChoneybee/status/984874958261248000?s=19

Ayatollah Amurike besjedi direktno Mahdiju u krevet u bijeloj kući

 

 

Potpaljivači