Prospero Posted May 15, 2013 Posted May 15, 2013 Here are some of the weirdest and most notable questions and requests that ABC found in roughly half a dozen IRS questionnaires sent to tea party groups from 2010 to 2012:•“Provide a list of all issues that are important to your organization. Indicate your position regarding each issue.”•“Please explain in detail the derivation of your organization’s name.” (in a letter to the Ohio-based 1851 Center for Constitutional Law)•“Please explain in detail your organization’s involvement with the Tea Party.”•“Provide details regarding your relationship with Justin Binik-Thomas.” (a Cincinnati-area Tea-Party activist)•“Provide information regarding the Butler County Teen Age Republicans and your relationship.”•“Submit the following information relating to your past and present directors, officers, and key employees: a) Provide a resume for each.”•“The names of the donors, contributors, and grantors. … The amounts of each of the donations, contributions, and grants and the dates you received them.”•“The names of persons from your organization and the amount of time they spent on the event or program.” (for events)•“Provide copies of the handbills you distributed at your monthly meetings.”•“Fully describe your youth outreach program with the local school.”•“Please provide copies of all your current web pages, including your Blog posts. Please provide copies of all of your newsletters, bulletins, flyers, newsletters or any other media or literature you have disseminated to your members or others. Please provide copies of stories and articles that have been published about you.”•“Are you on Facebook or other social networking sites? If yes, provide copies of these pages.”•“Provide copies of the agendas and minutes of your Board meetings and, if applicable, members ship meetings, including a description of legislative and electoral issues discussed, and whether candidates for political office were invited to address the meeting.”•“Do your issue-related advocacy communications compare to the positions of candidates or slates of candidates on these issues with your positions? Provide copies of these communications. What percentage do these constitute of your issue-related advocacy communications?”•“Do you have a close relationship with any candidate for political office or political party? If so describe fully the nature of that relationship.”•“Apart from your responses to the preceding, estimate the percentage of your time and what percentage of your resources you will devote to activities in the 2012 election cycle, in which you will explicitly or implicitly support or oppose a candidate, candidates or slates of candidates, for public office.”
mandingo Posted May 15, 2013 Posted May 15, 2013 Rand Paul nije libertarijanac. Bolji straw man bi bio Bob Barr, recimo. Nije da je Bob libertarijanac ali je bar bio clan LP.
Indy Posted May 15, 2013 Posted May 15, 2013 Ovo je mozda i najveca sramota za Obamu (medju narastajucim brojem sramota), barem na internom planu. Sto rece neko, kao da se trudi da pokaze da je Glenn Beck et al. sve u pravu.
Prospero Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 šef irs-a podneo ostavku.a pričice stižu svaki časnpr In May 2011, Drew Ryun, a conservative activist and former Republican National Committee staffer, began filling out the Internal Revenue Service application to achieve nonprofit status for a new conservative watchdog group.He submitted the paperwork to the IRS in July 2011 for a research site called Media Trackers, which calls itself a "non-partisan investigative watchdog dedicated to promoting accountability in the media and government." Although the site has investigated Republicans like Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Florida Gov. Rick Scott, the site's organizers are unapologetically conservative."One thing we don't hide is: 'Yeah, we're conservative—free-market, free-enterprise, full-spectrum conservative,'" Ryun told Mother Jones magazine last year.Eight months passed without word from the agency about the group's application, Ryun said. In February 2012, Ryun's attorney contacted the IRS to ask if it needed more information to secure its nonprofit status as a 501©3 organization. According to Ryun, the IRS told him that the application was being processed by the agency's office in Cincinnati, Ohio—the same one currently facing scrutiny for targeting conservative groups—and to check back in two months.As directed, Ryun followed up with the IRS in April 2012, and was told that Media Trackers' application was still under review.When September 2012 arrived with still no word from the IRS, Ryun determined that Media Trackers would likely never obtain standalone nonprofit status, and he tried a new approach: He applied for permanent nonprofit status for a separate group called Greenhouse Solutions, a pre-existing organization that was reaching the end of its determination period.The IRS approved Greenhouse Solutions' request for permanent nonprofit status in three weeks.In December 2012, Ryun simply made Media Trackers a project of Greenhouse Solutions and withdrew the Media Trackers application. iliNOM, a pro-traditional marriage organization, claims the IRS leaked their 2008 confidential financial documents to the rival Human Rights Campaign. Those NOM documents were published on the Huffington Post on March 30, 2012. At that time, Joe Solmonese, a left-wing activist and Huffington Post contributor, was the president of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC). Solmonese was also a 2012 Obama campaign co-chairman.Both the Huffington Post's Sam Stein and HRC described the leak as coming from a “whistleblower.” The Huffington Post used the document to write a story questioning former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s support for traditional marriage. The document showed Romney donated $10,000 to NOM. HRC went a step further than the Huffington Post in its criticism of Romney and accused him of using “racially divisive tactics” in a press release....In early April 2012, NOM published documents which it said showed this leaked confidential information did not come from a “whistleblower” but “came directly from the Internal Revenue Service and was provided to NOM's political opponents, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC).”NOM discovered that when HRC published its confidential financial documents, it failed to conceal the source of the documents. “After software removed the layers obscuring the document, it is shown that the document came from the Internal Revenue Service,” NOM asserted in its April 2012 release.“The top of each page says, ‘THIS IS A COPY OF A LIVE RETURN FROM SMIPS. OFFICIAL USE ONLY,’" the statement continues. "On each page of the return is stamped a document ID of ‘100560209.’ Only the IRS would have the Form 990 with ‘Official Use’ information."NOM president Brian Brown argued in that April 2012 release that the leak was made to benefit President Obama’s re-election campaign against Romney, his GOP challenger. “The American people are entitled to know how a confidential tax return containing private donor information filed exclusively with the Internal Revenue Service has been given to our political opponents whose leader also happens to be co-chairing President Obama's reelection committee,” Brown said. iliAs applications from conservative groups sat in limbo, groups with liberal-sounding names had their applications approved in as little as nine months. With names including words like "Progress" or "Progressive," the liberal groups applied for the same tax status and were engaged in the same kinds of activities as the conservative groups. They included:• Bus for Progress, a New Jersey non-profit that uses a red, white and blue bus to "drive the progressive change." According to its website, its mission includes "support (for) progressive politicians with the courage to serve the people's interests and make tough choices." It got an IRS approval as a social welfare group in April 2011.• Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment says it fights against corporate welfare and for increasing the minimum wage. "It would be fair to say we're on the progressive end of the spectrum," said executive director Jeff Ordower. He said the group got tax-exempt status in September 2011 in just nine months after "a pretty simple, straightforward process."• Progress Florida, granted tax-exempt status in January 2011, is lobbying the Florida Legislature to expand Medicaid under a provision of the Affordable Care Act, one of President Obama's signature accomplishments. The group did not return phone calls. "We're busy fighting to build a more progressive Florida and cannot take your call right now," the group's voice mail said.Like the Tea Party groups, the liberal groups sought recognition as social welfare groups under Section 501©(4) of the tax code, based on activities like "citizen participation" or "voter education and registration."neko se već setio, a i zbog AP-a naravno:
mandingo Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 Sad jos i ovo.http://www.nytimes.c...calls.html?_r=0
Zaz_pi Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 Opet preterujete. Obama je morao gomilu stvari da resi, prioritet mu je bila reforma zdravstva, i tu se mnogo potrosio. To je DP kostalo vecine u Kongresu, jer je bio zanemario i ekonomiju, sto mu je jos vise otezalo poziciju. Da je udario na mocne sluzbe, koje su neverovatno narasle za vreme Busa, imao bi jos vece probleme.Evo primer, sta radi NSA, dolazi ove jeseni:The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say) Today Bluffdale is home to one of the nation’s largest sects of polygamists, the Apostolic United Brethren, with upwards of 9,000 members. The brethren’s complex includes a chapel, a school, a sports field, and an archive. Membership has doubled since 1978—and the number of plural marriages has tripled—so the sect has recently been looking for ways to purchase more land and expand throughout the town.But new pioneers have quietly begun moving into the area, secretive outsiders who say little and keep to themselves. Like the pious polygamists, they are focused on deciphering cryptic messages that only they have the power to understand. Just off Beef Hollow Road, less than a mile from brethren headquarters, thousands of hard-hatted construction workers in sweat-soaked T-shirts are laying the groundwork for the newcomers’ own temple and archive, a massive complex so large that it necessitated expanding the town’s boundaries. Once built, it will be more than five times the size of the US Capitol.Rather than Bibles, prophets, and worshippers, this temple will be filled with servers, computer intelligence experts, and armed guards. And instead of listening for words flowing down from heaven, these newcomers will be secretly capturing, storing, and analyzing vast quantities of words and images hurtling through the world’s telecommunications networks. In the little town of Bluffdale, Big Love and Big Brother have become uneasy neighbors.Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.But “this is more than just a data center,” says one senior intelligence official who until recently was involved with the program. The mammoth Bluffdale center will have another important and far more secret role that until now has gone unrevealed. It is also critical, he says, for breaking codes. And code-breaking is crucial, because much of the data that the center will handle—financial information, stock transactions, business deals, foreign military and diplomatic secrets, legal documents, confidential personal communications—will be heavily encrypted. According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US. The upshot, according to this official: “Everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.” Sto je najgore, Bus je toliko ojacao sa ogromnim budzetom da ih je danas tesko skinuti sa grbace a efikasnost, narocito posle Bombaskog napada u Bostonu(gde je koriscen internet) je pod znakom pitanja:For the NSA, overflowing with tens of billions of dollars in post-9/11 budget awards, the cryptanalysis breakthrough came at a time of explosive growth, in size as well as in power. Established as an arm of the Department of Defense following Pearl Harbor, with the primary purpose of preventing another surprise assault, the NSA suffered a series of humiliations in the post-Cold War years. Caught offguard by an escalating series of terrorist attacks—the first World Trade Center bombing, the blowing up of US embassies in East Africa, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, and finally the devastation of 9/11—some began questioning the agency’s very reason for being. In response, the NSA has quietly been reborn. And while there is little indication that its actual effectiveness has improved—after all, despite numerous pieces of evidence and intelligence-gathering opportunities, it missed the near-disastrous attempted attacks by the underwear bomber on a flight to Detroit in 2009 and by the car bomber in Times Square in 2010—there is no doubt that it has transformed itself into the largest, most covert, and potentially most intrusive intelligence agency ever created.In the process—and for the first time since Watergate and the other scandals of the Nixon administration—the NSA has turned its surveillance apparatus on the US and its citizens. It has established listening posts throughout the nation to collect and sift through billions of email messages and phone calls, whether they originate within the country or overseas. It has created a supercomputer of almost unimaginable speed to look for patterns and unscramble codes. Finally, the agency has begun building a place to store all the trillions of words and thoughts and whispers captured in its electronic net. And, of course, it’s all being done in secret. To those on the inside, the old adage that NSA stands for Never Say Anything applies more than ever.
Indy Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 (edited) Da je udario na mocne sluzbe, koje su neverovatno narasle za vreme Busa, imao bi jos vece probleme.Na kakve probleme mislis? Koja je uopste poenta bivanja predsednikom onda, i to u 2 mandata, ako mozes da uradis samo 1 stvar (a ni to kako valja). Edited June 6, 2013 by Indy
Gandalf Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18781930-exclusive-cia-didnt-always-know-who-it-was-killing-in-drone-strikes-classified-documents-showThe CIA did not always know who it was targeting and killing in drone strikes in Pakistan over a 14-month period, an NBC News review of classified intelligence reports shows.About one of every four of those killed by drones in Pakistan between Sept. 3, 2010, and Oct. 30, 2011, were classified as "other militants,” the documents detail. The “other militants” label was used when the CIA could not determine the affiliation of those killed, prompting questions about how the agency could conclude they were a threat to U.S. national security.
mandingo Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 Nemoj da kenjas, Gandalf-e. Obama je reformirao zdravstvo! Ako ti to ne valja - onda si rasist!
Indy Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) Dakle, otisli su u 3 pm sa ovim spijuniranjem. CItam blog Richarda Stallmana, ali ne mogu da osmislim koriscenje interneta (a da ima nekog smisla) pod uslovom da se izbegnu ove govnarske korporacije (neke su pobrojane u tekstu ispod). Ako neko ima ideje, neka napise, bicu zahvalan. Vec sacujem da ubijem google mail, ali mi treba neka zamena (a da nije Yahoo, isto govno).. US security agencies tapping directly into internet giants' servers: reportUS intelligence agencies are accessing the servers of nine internet giants as part of a secret data mining program, according to reports from the US and Britain.The Washington Post reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) and the FBI had direct access to servers which allowed them to track an individual's web presence via audio, video, photographs, emails and connection logs.Some of the biggest firms in Silicon Valley were involved in the program, including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Apple, PalTalk, AOL, Skype and YouTube, reports said.EDIT. Mozda pokrenem temu na Racunarima, jer stvarno mi je dozlogrdilo. Edited June 7, 2013 by Indy
Prospero Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 Predji na ruse, yandex (ima i mejl i browser) ili mail.ru, i koristi tor Послато са HTC ChaCha A810e користећи Тапаток 2
Indy Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 E bas cu na Ruse da predjem, idi bre :lolol:Verujem da ima manje rizicnih varijanti.
Prospero Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 pa može da te špijunira fsb, ali šta te boli uvo, njihov domet je vrlo ograničen, msm koliko do'vata radioaktivna supstanca. :naughty:probaj operu, bilo šta evropsko, cenim da je deep state tu malo teže ostvariv.gmx, na primer.
Recommended Posts