Jump to content
IGNORED

Tramp posle poraza


vememah

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sekretar skupštinskog aktiva predao je predmet predsjedavajućem politbiroa Partije na odlučivanje


  • Haha 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Orange is the new black

  • Haha 5
Posted

Prati li neko optuznicu ? Moze li neki digest ...

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lezilebovich said:

Prati li neko optuznicu ? Moze li neki digest ...

 

Optužnica je 34 tačke za falsikovanje business records. To bi inače bilo misdemeanor ali je felony because of....reasons u suštini jer se ne vidi koji je underlying crime koji misd pretvara u felony. U suštini se navodi da je Tramp hteo da potplati taj oppo research koji je postojao protiv njega da bi bio izabran na izborima čime je doveo u zabludu nekoga. 

Edited by theanswer
  • Haha 1
Posted

Ne plasim se ja za Trumpa, on zna da zaposli najbolje ljude da mu urade pos'o

 

aumx4ngpmkxmee3xur12.jpg

 

Posted

Tramp je dobio šta je hteo, a i Demokrate verujem da su dobile šta su htele

 

NY Post i Murdochovi koji su se okrenuli pre toga protiv njega sada su u fazonu 

 

https://nypost.com/cover/april-5-2023/

 

Svi fox prime time voditelji su na njegovoj strani. Samo o tome se priča. Kako De Santis može iz ovoga da izađe kao pobednik stvarno je teško videti

 

 

Posted

to se sada momentalno najveci degeni loze na oranhita, desantis ce ga pocepati ko svinja trulu bundevu

Posted
10 hours ago, theanswer said:

 

Optužnica je 34 tačke za falsikovanje business records. To bi inače bilo misdemeanor ali je felony because of....reasons u suštini jer se ne vidi koji je underlying crime koji misd pretvara u felony. U suštini se navodi da je Tramp hteo da potplati taj oppo research koji je postojao protiv njega da bi bio izabran na izborima čime je doveo u zabludu nekoga. 

 

Violation of Federal Elections zakona nije misdemeanor. Usput mu je Kohen zbog toga bio u cumezu. Ali, nastavi sa svojim "strucnim tumacenjima". Da je platio ko covek, umesto da sakrije pare kao izborni trosak, ne bi imao nikakvih problema.

 

Tesko da ce zbog ovoga u zatvor (jer...Trump), iako bi trebao, ali zato kad dodje Gruzija na red, tu je jebao jeza.

Posted

Za one malo ozbiljnije forumase:

 

Quote

Campaign Financing Crimes

 

The federal campaign financing laws are embodied within the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), 52 U.S.C.  §§ 30101–30146, as amended (most significantly in 1974, 1976, 1979, and 2002).

 

As amended, FECA applies to virtually all financial transactions that impact upon, directly or indirectly, the election of candidates for federal office, that is, candidates for President or Vice President or for the United States Senate or House of Representatives.  FECA reaches a wide range of communications aimed at influencing the public with respect to issues that are closely identified with federal candidates, referred to in the law as “electioneering communications.”

 

FECA contains its own criminal sanctions, which provide that, to be a crime, a FECA violation must have been committed knowingly and willfully and, except for campaign misrepresentations and certain coerced contributions, must have involved at least $2,000 in a calendar year.  52 U.S.C. § 30109(d).  FECA crimes aggregating $25,000 or more are five-year felonies, and those that involve illegal conduit contributions and aggregate over $10,000 are two-year felonies.  52 U.S.C. § 30109(d)(1)(A), (D).  Moreover, all criminal violations of FECA are subject to U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 2C1.8, that the United States Sentencing Commission promulgated in response to a specific Congressional directive.

 

FECA violations that either: (1) do not present knowing and willful violations, or (2) involve sums below the statutory minimums for criminal prosecution, are handled non-criminally by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) under the statute’s civil enforcement provisions.  52 U.S.C. § 30109(a). 4

 

Finally, FECA violations that result in false information being provided to the FEC may present violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy to disrupt and impede a federal agency), 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false statements within the jurisdiction of a federal agency), 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (obstruction of agency proceedings), or 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (creation of false records in relation to or contemplation of federal matters). 

 

Izvor: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, dragance said:

Da je platio ko covek, umesto da sakrije pare kao izborni trosak, ne bi imao nikakvih problema.

 

Covek je hteo da se oslobodi stresa u kampanji, tako da moze da prodje kao izborni trosak.

 

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...