Dagmar Posted March 5, 2017 Posted March 5, 2017 Ha, ha, kao kad bi rekao da je Balkan svetu dao ustase. Znaci, i Srbi koji su se borili protiv ustasa i bili njihove najvece zrtve, su po tvojoj logici generalizacije dali svetu ustase. cesfitam Hrvati kulturološki nisu Balkan, samo (donekle) geografski.
onamonamo Posted March 5, 2017 Posted March 5, 2017 ako je sokrat sokrates, onda je i staljinizam sa zapada, posto je staljin iz dzordzije
Meazza Posted March 5, 2017 Posted March 5, 2017 Ha, ha, kao kad bi rekao da je Balkan svetu dao ustase. Znaci, i Srbi koji su se borili protiv ustasa i bili njihove najvece zrtve, su po tvojoj logici generalizacije dali svetu ustase. cesfitam Ne postoji "balkanska civilizacija", Balkan je miks najmanje tri susedne civilizacije, gde je ona zapadna dala ustase, da budemo sasvim precizni.
Meazza Posted March 5, 2017 Posted March 5, 2017 Odnosno nije dala nista, vec je uvezla postojeci model koji je u to vreme bio moderan u centralnoj i juznoj Evropi, da budemo jos precizniji.
Anduril Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Hrvati kulturološki nisu Balkan, samo (donekle) geografski. Svejedno - generalizuj pa reci Balkan je dao svetu cetnike. Siguran sam da ce se Bosnjaci i Albanci sloziti i prihvatiti cetnike kao deo svoje kulture kao sto Britanci prihvataju naciste.
kobni zelaya Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Britanci upravo prihvataju naciste - kao i Ameri, Francuzi, Poljaci, Ukrajinci, itd. I Rusi, uostalom. Džabe se svađate.
Lord Protector Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Svejedno - generalizuj pa reci Balkan je dao svetu cetnike. Siguran sam da ce se Bosnjaci i Albanci sloziti i prihvatiti cetnike kao deo svoje kulture kao sto Britanci prihvataju naciste. ipak si ti samo komunista, džaba tirade sa zapadnih pozicija
eumeswil Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 (edited) Pa objasni koja se to dominantno nacisticka i fasisticka tradicija vuce specificno jos od stare Grcke ili Renesanse? Nije da nema duboke korene u nekim fundamentalnim karakteristikama tzv. zapadne civilizacije. http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=1103 "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Edited March 6, 2017 by miki.bg
Simon Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Не бих да паметујем :) али само једна примједба. Трпате традицију и културу тамо гдје јој није мјесто и објашњавате феномене кроз традиције и културе. Помало застарјело, препоручујем вам да не би упадали нон-стоп у замке генерализације и мјешали у све и свашта културу и традицију и правили од тога бућкуриш да покушате можда да објасните те ствари кроз културни комплекситет.
Lord Protector Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 (edited) Joseph Arthur, Comte de Gobineau (14 July 1816 – 13 October 1882) was a French aristocrat who was best known by his contemporaries as a novelist, diplomat and travel writer but is today most remembered for developing the theory of the Aryan master race and helping to legitimise racism by scientific racist theory and racial demography. Gobineau was an elitist who, in the immediate aftermath of the Revolutions of 1848, wrote a 1400-page book, An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, in which he claimed that aristocrats were superior to commoners and that they possessed more Aryan genetic traits because of less inbreeding with inferior races (Alpines and Mediterraneans). Gobineau's writings were quickly praised by white supremacist, pro-slavery Americans like Josiah C. Nott and Henry Hotze, who translated his book into English but omitted around 1000 pages of the original book, including those parts that negatively described Americans as a racially mixed population. Gobineau's writings were also influential on prominent anti-Semites such as Richard Wagner, the Romanian far-right politician professor A. C. Cuza and leaders of the Nazi Party, who later edited and re-published his work. Houston Stewart Chamberlain (9 September 1855 – 9 January 1927) was a British-born German philosopher who wrote works about political philosophy and natural science; he is described by Michael D. Biddiss, a contributor to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography as a "racialist writer".[1] He was also the son-in-law of German composer Richard Wagner, as, in December 1908, twenty-five years after Wagner's death, Chamberlain married the composer's daughter, Eva von Bülow (Cosima Wagner was still married to Hans von Bülow when Eva was born – her real father was Wagner). Chamberlain's best known book is the two-volume Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts (The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century),[2] published in 1899, which became widely read in the völkisch pan-Germanic movements of the early 20th century, and, later was an influence for the antisemitism of Nazi racial policy. In the book, Chamberlain advances various racist and especially völkisch antisemitic theories on how he saw the Aryan race as superior to others, and the Teutonic peoples as a positive force in European civilization and the Jews as a negative one. It was his best-selling book. Edited March 6, 2017 by slow
onamonamo Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 najsmesnije kod ovog koji sokrata zove sokratesom, je to sto ne kapira, ili se pravi da ne kapira, da njegovo insistiranje na velicanstvenosti zapadne civilizacije, na vrlinama koje su superiorne u odnosu na druge civilizacije, predstavlja rasizam u svom najrazvijenijem obliku
Eraserhead Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 najsmesnije kod ovog koji sokrata zove sokratesom, je to sto ne kapira, ili se pravi da ne kapira, da njegovo insistiranje na velicanstvenosti zapadne civilizacije, na vrlinama koje su superiorne u odnosu na druge civilizacije, predstavlja rasizam u svom najrazvijenijem obliku Imam ja druga koji je primio budizam i misli da je istocnjacka civilizacija vrhunac produhovljenosti. Zamisljam kako bi me pogledao da mu kazem da je rasista. Svasta se ovde moze procitati zaista.
Dagmar Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Svejedno - generalizuj pa reci Balkan je dao svetu cetnike. Siguran sam da ce se Bosnjaci i Albanci sloziti i prihvatiti cetnike kao deo svoje kulture kao sto Britanci prihvataju naciste. Pa naravno da je Balkan dao (svetu) četnike, nisu došli iz Tukatimbe cijenim.
dillinger Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Imam ja druga koji je primio budizam i misli da je istocnjacka civilizacija vrhunac produhovljenosti. Zamisljam kako bi me pogledao da mu kazem da je rasista. Svasta se ovde moze procitati zaista. Jel drug nastoji uterati taj budizam u svaki kutak planete?
Dagmar Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Imam ja druga koji je primio budizam i misli da je istocnjacka civilizacija vrhunac produhovljenosti. Zamisljam kako bi me pogledao da mu kazem da je rasista. Svasta se ovde moze procitati zaista. Možda nije rasista, al ne deluje ni da je baš u vinklu. XXI vek i ljudima nije dosta što su ih već roditelji krstili, sunitili ili šta već, nego se još pokrštavaju.
Recommended Posts