Jump to content
IGNORED

Distopije i utopije (u filmu, knjizevnosti, filozofiji i stvarnom zivotu)


noskich

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
The pathology of the whole system arises because monetary value — which is originally and by essence of instrumental value — is exalted to the position of ultimate value.

 

All other domains of intrinsic life value — natural, human, and spiritual — are colonized, subjugated, and turned into instruments for maximizing monetary value. 

 


Edited by noskich
Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

"Indeed, in contrast to anarchist theorists like Proudhon, who considered the spread of capitalism and the proletarianization of preindustrial peasantry and craftspeople to be a disaster, Marx and Engels enthusiastically welcomed these developments, as well as the formation of large, centralized nation-states in which market economies could flourish. They saw them not only as desiderata in fostering economic development but, by promoting capitalism, as indispensable in creating the preconditions for socialism. Despite their support for proletarian internationalism, they derogated what they saw as “abstract” denunciations of nationalism as such or scorned them as merely “moralistic.” Although internationalism in the interests of class solidarity remained a desideratum for Marx and Engels, their view implicitly stood at odds with their commitment to capitalist economic expansion with its need in the last century for centralized nation-states. They held the nation-state to be good or bad insofar as it advanced or inhibited the expansion of capital, the advance of the “productive forces,” and the proletarianization of preindustrial peoples. In principle, they looked askance at the nationalist sentiments of Indians, Chinese, Africans, and the rest of the noncapitalist world, whose precapitalist social forms might impede capitalist expansion. Ireland, ironically, seems to have been an exception to this approach. Marx, Engels, and the Marxist movement as a whole acknowledged the right of the Irish to national liberation largely for sentimental reasons and because it would produce problems for English imperialism, which commanded a world market. In the main, until such time as a socialist society could be achieved, Marxists considered the formation of large, ever more centralized nation-states in Europe to be “historically progressive.” - Murray Bookchin

 

Kapital, drzava i projekat unistenja planete, tri glave iste zveri.

 

china_2304612b.jpg

 

 

Plutokratija na delu:

 

Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild

 

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2015/09/why-murdoch-pushes-for-war/

 

I `socijalisticka `demokratija`` bez solidarnosti:

 

Denmark Takes Out Adverts to Tell Refugees They Aren’t Welcome

http://www.wsj.com/articles/denmark-takes-out-adverts-to-tell-refugees-they-arent-welcome-1441630475

Edited by noskich
Link to comment

The pathology...

 

 

Hm..

 

 

uzrok problema civilizacije od pocetka do kraja

 

 

Moguce da vise pasujem takvoj demokratiji nego ovoj demokratiji...
Nisam apologeta nikakve drzave, to jest zalazem se za potpuno odsustvo i drzave i trzista

 

Pazi, moj ideal nije ... Moj ideal je ...

 

Ne, za mene je cilj ...

 

Spanska republika tokom gradjanskog rata, Ukrajina tokom vojne kontrole Nestora Mahnoa, pa danas Zapatisti u Meksiku i Rojava - zapadna Sirija su primeri kako drustvo funkcionise

 

Link to comment

Imagining a World Beyond Corporate Control

http://new-compass.net/articles/imagining-world-beyond-corporate-control

 

Pre nego sto su seljaci primorani da odu u gradove u kojima su punili redove lumpenproletarijata svuda je postojalo nesto kao commons, sto je danas u gradovima vrlo retka stvar, jedini primer kojeg se mogu setiti je park. Ako ti pozli mozes negde da sednes i popijes vode, udahnes cistog vazduha. Za razliku od soping molova u kojima nema nista od toga.

 

Commons ne pripada nikome, to jest pripada svima. Poljana koju su svi seljaci u kraju koristili za ispasu. Suma koju su takodje koristili za ogrev. Lokalni ljudi koji zavise od lokalnih resursa su znali njihova ogranicenja i nisu sekli granu na kojoj sede. Ta grana se sece kada neko iz daljine u cilju partikularnog interesa (bilo drzavnog, bilo privatnog) dodje, uzme sta god moze i ostavi upropascenu sredinu u kojoj se vise ne moze ziveti.

Edited by noskich
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...