Distopije i utopije (u filmu, knjizevnosti, filozofiji i stvarnom zivotu)

[noskich]

The more enlightened man will become, the less he will employ compulsion and coercion. The really civilized man will divest himself of all fear and authority. He will rise from the dust and stand erect: he will bow to no tsar either in heaven or on earth. He will become fully human when he will scorn to rule and refuse to be ruled. He will be truly free only when there shall be no more masters.

Anarchism is the ideal of such a condition; of a society without force and compulsion, where all men shall be equals, and live in freedom, peace, and harmony.

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government, because government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion.

Anarchy therefore does not mean disorder and chaos, as you thought before. On the contrary, it is the very reverse of it; it means no government, which is freedom and liberty. Disorder is the child of authority and compulsion. Liberty is the mother of order.

 

Alexander Berkman

[noskich]

[mustang]

ima li nekih eksperimenata na temu energije koju covek emituje? 

 

mnogi se od nas vode instiktom, impulsom i npr. kada bih se vodila time mislim da bih ne pogresivo procenjivala osobe. ali razum cesto umesa i prste i kao ajd da vidim sta ce biti. mozda gresim...ispostavi se da ta energija koju druga osoba emituje bude ono sto bih odbila na prvu loptu bez razuma. ovo ne znaci da ne bih komunicirala sa njom ali bih se drugacije postavila a ne kao otvorena knjiga ili nepotrebno ulagala svoje vreme i energiju.

Edited July 1, 2014 by mustang

[Agni]

ima li nekih eksperimenata na temu energije koju covek emituje? 

 

Ima.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-WEbbPBbB8

[noskich]

ima li nekih eksperimenata na temu energije koju covek emituje? 

 

mnogi se od nas vode instiktom, impulsom i npr. kada bih se vodila time mislim da bih ne pogresivo procenjivala osobe. ali razum cesto umesa i prste i kao ajd da vidim sta ce biti. mozda gresim...ispostavi se da ta energija koju druga osoba emituje bude ono sto bih odbila na prvu loptu bez razuma. ovo ne znaci da ne bih komunicirala sa njom ali bih se drugacije postavila a ne kao otvorena knjiga ili nepotrebno ulagala svoje vreme i energiju.

Ima, ali to nije tema ovde. Pogledaj na temi `Bez samospoznaje nema slobodne volje`, isto deo metafizike.

[mustang]

nema tamo nista.

 

kao sto u razgovoru citamo izraz lica sagovornika tako smo i u mogucnosti da citamo energiju iz njega. to me interesuje. ima li nesto na tu temu.

[noskich]

Potrazi o eksperimentima sa Matthieu Ricard-om. Ne samo sto cita sagovornika nego potpuno preokrece sagovornikovo mentalno stanje (smiruje se puls, disanje, opusta se telo...). Ovo i nije nikakva magija. Kada je neko smiren i nije egocentrican pre ili kasnije sagovornik ce se smiriti ako je u pitanju neki problem.

[mustang]

Thx

[noskich]

People with more contrarian, less agreeable personalities were more likely to refuse to hurt other people when told to do so. People holding left-wing political views were less willing to comply with demands to inflict suffering.

 

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-green-mind/201406/are-polite-people-more-violent-and-destructive

 

The irony is that a personality disposition normally seen as antisocial — disagreeableness — may actually be linked to 'pro-social' behavior. This connection seems to arise from a willingness to sacrifice one’s popularity a bit to act in a moral and just way toward other people, animals, or the environment at large. Popularity, in the end, may be more a sign of social graces and perhaps a desire to fit in than any kind of moral superiority.

 

[logoped]

nisam znala gde da stavim prilog, ali mislim imanipulacija idejom o sigurnom svetu, iščitati se dade

 

 

Edited July 6, 2014 by logoped

[noskich]

 

Edited July 6, 2014 by noskich

[noskich]

He whose law is within himself
Walks in hiddenness.
His acts are not influenced
By approval or disapproval.
He whose law is outside himself
Directs his will to what is 
Beyond his control
And seeks
To extend his power
Over objects.

He who walks in hiddenness
Has light to guide him
In all his acts.
He who seeks to extend his control
Is nothing but an operator.
While he thinks he is 
Surpassing others,
Others see him merely
Straining, stretching,
To stand on tiptoe.

When he tries to extend his power
Over objects,
Those objects gain control
Of him.

He who is controlled by objects
Loses possession of his inner self:
If he no longer values himself,
How can he value others?
If he no longer values others,
He is abandoned.
He has nothing left!

There is no deadlier weapon than the will!
The sharpest sword
Is not equal to it!
There is no robber so dangerous
As Nature (Yang and Yin).
Yet it is not nature
That does the damage:
It is man’s own will!

—Chuang Tzu, translation by Thomas Merton

[noskich]

Mission statement svih korporacija i vlada:

 

“Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know what no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.” 
― George Orwell, 1984

[noskich]

 

Did you know that in July 1936 millions of Spanish workers took part in the largest experiment in workers self-management that has ever existed? Most people know about the fascist coup and the republican resistance to it but the story of the revolution inside the republic is not so well known. 

We'd invite you to use the anniversary to find out more and consider what lessons learned then remain relevant to us in our struggles today.

----

The 19th of July marks the 78th anniversary of the beginning of the Spanish Revolution. For a brief time, capitalism and the State were replaced by solidarity, mutual aid and respect for others. Workers and peasants, who were deeply influenced by anarchist ideas, ran society collectively and gained control over their lives, industry and land. A central part of the revolution was the struggle against a fascist attempt to take over Spain. We remember both the magnificent triumphs and tragedies of the Spanish revolution and attempt to learn from our comrades’ mistakes.

Anarchist and syndicalist ideas had deep roots among Spanish peasants and workers. In 1911, a massive revolutionary trade union federation, the CNT (National Confederation of Labour) was formed. It had two aims; first, to fight the bosses with mass action in the daily struggle and, second, to make an anarchist revolution by organising the workers and the poor to seize back the land, factories and mines.

The CNT led many militant and successful struggles against the bosses and the government. By 1936 it was the biggest union in Spain, with nearly two million members. But the CNT was always democratic and, despite its giant size, never had more than one paid official.

The Anarchists did not restrict themselves to the workplace. They also organised an anarchist political group to work within the unions (the FAI) and organised rent boycotts in poor areas. The CNT itself included working peasants, farm workers and the unemployed. It even organised workers’ schools!

In July 1936, fascists led by General Franco, and backed by the rich and the Church, tried to seize power in Spain. The elected government (the Popular Front coalition of left-wing parties) was unable and unwilling to deal with the fascists. It even tried to strike a deal with the fascists by appointing a right-winger as Prime Minister. Why? Because they would rather compromise with the right wing and protect their wealth and power than arm the workers and the poor for self-defence.

Fortunately, the workers and the peasants did not wait around for the government to act. The CNT declared a general strike and organised armed resistance to the attempted take-over. Other unions and left wing groups followed the CNT’s lead.

In this way the people were able to stop the fascists in two-thirds of Spain. It soon became apparent to these workers and peasants that this was not just a war against fascists, but the beginning of a revolution! Anarchist influence was everywhere, workers’ militias were set up independently from the State, workers seized control of their workplaces and peasants seized the land.

There were many triumphs of the revolution, although we are only able to consider a few of the Spanish workers’ and peasants’ victories here. These included the general take over of the land and factories.

Small peasants and farm workers faced extremely harsh conditions in Spain. Starvation and repression were a part of their daily lives and, as a result, anarchism was particularly strong in the countryside. During the revolution, as many as 7 million peasants and farm workers set up voluntary collectives in the anti-fascist regions. After landowners fled, a village assembly was held. If a decision to collectivise was taken, all the land, tools and animals were pooled together for the use of the entire collective. Teams were formed to look after the various areas of work, while a committee was elected to co-ordinate the overall running of the collective. Each collective had regular general meetings in which all members participated. Individuals who did not want to join the collectives were not forced to. They were given enough land to farm on, but were forbidden to hire labourers to work this land. Most “individualists” eventually joined the collectives when they saw how successful they were.

Anarchism inspired massive transformations in industry. Workers seized control over their workplaces, and directly controlled production by themselves and for the benefit of the Spanish workers and peasants. The tram system in Barcelona provided a shining example of just how much better things can be done under direct workers’ control. On July 24th 1936, the tram crews got together and decided to run the whole system themselves. Within five days, 700 trams were in service instead of the usual 600. Wages were equalised and working conditions improved, with free medical care provided for workers.

Everyone benefited from the trams being under workers’ control. Fares were reduced and an extra 50 million passengers were transported. Surplus income was used to improve transport services and produce weapons for defence of the revolution. With the capitalist profit motive gone, safety became much more important and the number of accidents were reduced.

In the early stages of the revolution, the armed forces of the state had effectively collapsed. In their place, the trade unions and left-wing organisations set about organising the armed workers and peasants into militias. Overall, there were 150,000 volunteers willing to fight where they were needed. The vast majority were members of the CNT. All officers were elected by the rank-and-file and had no special privileges.

The revolution showed that workers, peasants and the poor could create a new world without bosses or a government. It showed that anarchist ideas and methods (such as building revolutionary unions) could work. Yet despite all this, the revolution was defeated. By 1939, the fascists had won the civil war and crushed the working-class and peasants with a brutal dictatorship.

Why did this happen? The revolution was defeated partly because of the strength of the fascists. They were backed by the rich, fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.

The CNT also made mistakes. It aimed for maximum anti-fascist unity and joined the Popular Front alliance, which included political parties from government and pro-capitalist forces. This required the CNT to make many compromises in its revolutionary programme. It also gave the Popular Front government an opportunity to undermine and destroy the anarchist collectives and the workers militias, with the Communist Party playing a leading role in these attacks at the behest of Stalinist Russia.

Nevertheless, anarchists had proved that ideas, which look good in the pages of theory books, look even better on the canvas of life.

Edited July 18, 2014 by noskich

[noskich]