Prospero Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 "nadmeni saveznik". meni tastatura brža od pameti :)
MancMellow Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 Izvinite, ali šta je to "Izdani saveznik", guglam i ne ide mi.ne ne zove se tako knjiga, sacu pm
MancMellow Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 "nadmeni saveznik". meni tastatura brža od pameti :)ne nego, nevoljni ratnici :) ne moram pm :D
MancMellow Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) btw, nadmenog saveznika sad već moram da pročitam, bar ono što me se tiče bar, osećam da ću se preznojiti, al što se mora nije teško :D Edited May 18, 2013 by MancMellow
Prospero Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 A ono "potraga za zastitnikom" o odnosima sa sad? To nisam fulao :DПослато са HTC ChaCha A810e користећи Тапаток 2
MancMellow Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 Da, to je zanimljivo. Mislim, to sto je meni malko cudno u toj knjizi, mogu da govorim samo o završnim delovima, je ta americka zaštita od navodno udruženih F,UK i I koji su sve hteli da "nam" otmu. Mislim da su tu bili očigledni prioriteti SHS diplomatije, ali...nije WW1 pa da ne opterecujemo ( :D ) Hoću da kažem, nismo mi baš bili toliki očajnici.
Roger Sanchez Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 ekekekepočelo je :wicked:hodorekekenastavlja se
Otto Katz Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 (edited) But from the present day, things look different. After the breakup of Yugoslavia and the massacres at Srebrenica and elsewhere, it's a bit harder to regard Serbia's irredentist agenda in the early 20th century as so benign. The true picture of the past whizzes by. Only as a picture, which flashes its final farewell in the moment of its recognizability, is the past to be held fast. “The truth will not run away from us” – this remark by Gottfried Keller denotes the exact place where historical materialism breaks through historicism’s picture of history. For it is an irretrievable picture of the past, which threatens to disappear with every present, which does not recognize itself as meant in it.To articulate what is past does not mean to recognize “how it really was.” It means to take control of a memory, as it flashes in a moment of danger. For historical materialism it is a question of holding fast to a picture of the past, just as if it had unexpectedly thrust itself, in a moment of danger, on the historical subject. The danger threatens the stock of tradition as much as its recipients. For both it is one and the same: handing itself over as the tool of the ruling classes. In every epoch, the attempt must be made to deliver tradition anew from the conformism which is on the point of overwhelming it. For the Messiah arrives not merely as the Redeemer; he also arrives as the vanquisher of the Anti-Christ. The only writer of history with the gift of setting alight the sparks of hope in the past, is the one who is convinced of this: that not even the dead will be safe from the enemy, if he is victorious. And this enemy has not ceased to be victorious. Drugim riječima mladobosanski emancipatorski potencijal je potrošen s propašću južnoslavenskog projekta. Sad je na snazi istina srbijanskog expanzionizma i mini imperijalzma. U čemu ne nedostaje poetske pravde, jer ovo je na istoj strani novčića, na kojoj i rehabilitacija srpske nacionalno-demokratske antiteze XX stoljeća. Edited June 30, 2013 by king louie
Sestre Bronte Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 With Croatia's accession to the European Union, virtually all the Habsburg lands are now once again part of a loose but substantial political federation and it's not totally crazy to imagine the relevant territory having evolved in that direction without passing through the veil of world wars and communist dictatorships.veoma ozbiljan analitičar, odvojio je vreme čak i da pogleda mapu habzburških zemalja
dillinger Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 (edited) U jbte, kad Izrael, Rusija i Amerika u vremenima pred nama dodatno zagužvaju na Bliskom istoku, mnogim korespondentima ni Hitler više neće delovati tako sumanuto Edited June 30, 2013 by dillinger
Prospero Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 kakvi ste to, pa mučeni zapad ne može više da ima ni lažna sećanja od vašeg zakeranja :(edit: iz slejta je najbolja korekcija:* Correction—an earlier version of this post described Serbia's territorial ambitions as including Slovakia when in fact their goal was to incorporate Slovenia.
MancMellow Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 * Correction—an earlier version of this post described Serbia's territorial ambitions as including Slovakia when in fact their goal was to incorporate Slovenia. jepse, upravo sam to bio kopirao sa namerom da okacim kad ono neko bio brzi <_<
Zverilla Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 * Correction—an earlier version of this post described Serbia's territorial ambitions as including Slovakia when in fact their goal was to incorporate Slovenia. pa sta sad, i eksperti grese.slovenija slovacka isti kurac (== velikosrpska hegemonija)
Prospero Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 velikosrbstvo je tako očigledno da prosto ne zahteva naprezanje vijuga da bi se na njega ukazalo.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now