Sirius Posted March 3, 2012 Posted March 3, 2012 Ti ocito nisi u stanju da ukapiras ni 2% onog sto ja pricam. Knjigu u sake, a ne filmove Michael Moorea.Koju knjigu preporucujes za dobar opis odnosa SAD-Saudijiska Arabija? Moze i neka dobra knjiga o americkoj spoljnoj politici.Ozbiljno pitam.
Anonymous Posted March 3, 2012 Posted March 3, 2012 Mene samo zanima da li je Izrael u stanju da (napadom na Iran) isprovocira američku reakciju, tj. da mu ona pritrči u pomoć.
Roger Sanchez Posted March 3, 2012 Posted March 3, 2012 Ahmadinedzadova partija tek treca na izborima.Što samo pokazuje samo ono što odavna znamo - da je bio i ostat će samo pseto na Rahbarovom lancu.
korindjar Posted March 5, 2012 Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) saudijci su okrenuli cene za aprilhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-04/saudi-aramco-raises-oil-premium-for-april-sales-to-asia-u-s-cuts-europe.htmlmedium i heavy su pojeftinili za med region (grčka, italija, španija), gde se dosta trošio iranian heavy, sve ostalo je poskupelo za aziju. sad je još pitanje šta će uraditi ostali proizvođači Edited March 5, 2012 by korindjar
Sirius Posted March 8, 2012 Posted March 8, 2012 Report: Netanyahu OKed delay of Iran attack till after the election for bunker-bustersThe US will supply Israel with bunker-busting bombs and refueling planes in return for delaying a strike against Iran until at least the end of the year, Maariv reported on Thursday. During their meeting earlier this week in Washington, Barack Obama promised Benjamin Netanyahu the latest deep-penetration arms from the US arsenal as well as airborne tankers to refuel strike jets necessary for an Israeli attack on Iran. In return, Israel will agree to not take any action until after the upcoming US presidential elections in November 2012.Although rumors of the possible supply of new bombs and planes began even while Netanyahu was still in the US, Maariv’s claim, based on Western sources, is that supply of the equipment is conditional on postponing an attack. Obama gave Israel neither a green light for an attack, nor a red light, but rather a “bright yellow light,” sources told Maariv, adding that the yellow light is nearly red. Obama told Netanyahu that an Israeli attack, uncoordinated with the US, will have the most serious implications on regional stability and relations between the two countries. Maariv said that sources close to the recent meetings in Washington reported that it will be “difficult, if not impossible” for Israel to ignore Obama’s warnings.Central to the difference of opinions is at what stage of the uranium enrichment process it will become necessary to use military force. According to intelligence reports, Iran has succeeded in enriching 120 kilogram (265 lbs.) of uranium to 20 percent purity. To make a bomb the Iranians require 250 kg (550 lbs) of 90% pure uranium. However, enriching from 20% to 90% is a relatively fast process, meaning Israel may see its window for action closing. According to Maariv, the US is prepared to wait until Iran has 250 kg of 20% rich uranium, but Israel considers the current developments beyond its own red line for action.
Sirius Posted March 16, 2012 Posted March 16, 2012 Ipak: Evaluation: Most of the cabinet for Iran attackEight ministers tend to support the position of Netanyahu and Barak for attack Iran, against six opponents. Cabinet members told the Knesset, Netanyahu's speech yesterday: "It sounds like a speech preparation for attack." A senior official: "The prime minister did not wait for U.S. elections in November"
Eraserhead Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Peter Rushton. Oni jos uvek njega furaju kao sagovornika.
korindjar Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 (edited) “If you believe Hormuz will be closed, I will sell you the Empire State or the Egyptian pyramids,” Ali al-Naimi said in a briefing with reporters in Doha, Qatar today. “I want to assure you that there is no shortage of supply in the market. OPEC is supplying what it needs, we have capacity, additional reserves of 2.5 million barrels” a day.The global market is oversupplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day and inventories are rising, the minister said. Stockpiles in nations belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, were at 58.5 days worth of consumption last month and may reach 60 days this month, the Saudi minister said.Oil supply disruptions in Yemen, Sudan and Syria are located in “miniscule” producers and total no more than 500,000 barrels a day, al-Naimi said. At the same time, OPEC members are boosting capacity. Libya will probably restore daily output to about 1.7 million barrels “very soon” and Iraq has commissioned facilities to export 900,000 barrels, he said.In addition, Saudi Arabia’s overseas crude tanks are full and total about 10 million barrels, while local stockpiles are “significantly higher,” he said.“Our inventories both in Saudi Arabia and worldwide are full,” the minister said. “Our Rotterdam inventory is full, our Sidi Kerir is full, our Okinawa is full. 100 percent full.”http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-20/saudi-arabia-can-increase-oil-output-25-if-needed-naimi-says.htmlizgleda da su nagomilali suviše nafte u nadi rata i dodatne zarade na prodaji tokom prvih par dana histerije Edited March 21, 2012 by korindjar
Prospero Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Koju knjigu preporucujes za dobar opis odnosa SAD-Saudijiska Arabija? Moze i neka dobra knjiga o americkoj spoljnoj politici.Ozbiljno pitam.Ne znam da li si dobio odgovor, ali ovo se smatra maltene klasikom: Robert Vitalis, America's Kingdom: Mythmaking on the Saudi Oil Frontier
Prospero Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Special Report: Intel shows Iran nuclear threat not imminent (Reuters) - The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead....
wall Posted March 27, 2012 Posted March 27, 2012 Nije to bas tako...El Baradej: Svako ko napadne Iran potpuno je lud http://blic.rs/i/314158
korindjar Posted April 2, 2012 Posted April 2, 2012 Iran Breaks UN Resolutions on Nuclear Program, Russia Says“The scale of the Iranian nuclear program is expanding,” Ryabkov said yesterday in an interview in New Delhi. This “is in direct violation of UN resolutions.”“Some of our Western partners think more sanctions are like amulets that will protect them from evil spirits. That’s irrational,” he said. “Sanctions don’t take us to any result. They have a counter result. Sanctions are only suffocating Iran’s economy.”Ryabkov’s comments “are eyebrow-raising to say the least,” according to ING Groep NV economist Simon Quijano- Evans, who notes that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Russia this month to warn Iran it has one last chance to reach a negotiated settlement over its nuclear program, according to a March 14 report in Russia’s Kommersant newspaper.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-29/iran-breaks-un-resolutions-as-nuclear-program-grows-russia-says.html
Recommended Posts