Dobra plata, dobro mesto, jeftin real estate

[pacey defender]

Noškić, evo ti jedna gajba, da se skućiš.http://www.zillow.co...09/323108_zpid/48k USD je za ovakvu kuću skroz dobra kupovina. Ovaj grad je dao 1 predsednika.Pre kupovine treba preboleti to što je gajba otišla na foreclosure, ali dobra plata zarađena u kapitalizmu može da otplati jeftin real estate bez zaduživanja, zar ne?

Edited September 19, 2013 by pacey defender

[noskich]

Noškić, evo ti jedna gajba, da se skućiš.

Da se skucim ne treba mi gajba, samo zemlja. Kucicu sam mogu da napravim.Kupovina stanova mi moze biti interesantna samo kao investicija, a ovde je problem lokacija. US me ne interesuje, ni za zivot ni za investiranje.Bilo je ovde nekih sema da se ulozi u nekretninu u US sve preko nekih agencija koje kupuju, izdaju, popravljaju... sve rade za tebe, ti samo da das pare.Dosta se ljudi opeklo. Ne moze da se izda, stanar napravi stetu pa pobegne, agencija uzima preveliku proviziju...To moze biti dobra prilika za nekoga ko zivi u okolini pa moze i da izda i da popravi. Ovako na daljinu ne bih se upustao u to u zemlji u kojoj sam stranac i gde nemam nikoga da mi pomogne s tim u vezi.

[noskich]

Srecni na otpadu:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b67TXGv7Ww

[noskich]

Sjajno: http://www.theonion.com/articles/temp-hides-fun-fulfilling-life-from-rest-of-office,49/BOSTON—Ty Braxton, 23, continues to hide his fun and fulfilling life from the full-time employees of Hale & Dorr, the Boston law firm for which he has temped since July.The happily underemployed Braxton."At a job like this, where you're surrounded by angry, perpetually stressed-out lawyers who are working 80 hours a week, it's important to hide the fact that you're enjoying a normal, balanced, happy life," Braxton said Monday. "People get really pissed when they hear stuff like that."

[Dagmar]

Pa kako krije svoju sreću kad ju je upravo detaljno opisao novinama?

[Shan Jan]

Sad treba da nam uzor budu ljudi sa devizom "ne mogu oni tolko malo da me plate koliko ja mogu malo da radim"?

[noskich]

Ne, sa devizom radim da zivim, ne zivim da radim.Advokati poslednji film koji su videli Gladijator, sad ce oni da pregledaju opskurni Onion, hoce , narocito nakon 10-12 sati u kancelariji.To bilo 2002, evo gde je sada chova: http://en.wikipedia....Tyondai_BraxtonOvo na kraju je stvarno sustina: "They wanted to go for the brass ring and really live the good life," Braxton said. "What they don't seem to get is that the key to living the good life is to avoid that brass ring like the fucking plague."

Edited September 22, 2013 by noskich

[Shan Jan]

Slazem se da ne treba raditi 12 sati dnevno 7 dana u nedelji (upravo sam trenutno upao u takav posao i gledam prvom prilikom da ga napustim). Ali ovaj cova je umetnik, radio je sto je morao. Nisu svi takvi. Ja naprotiv volim da radim neke stvari, sto bi rekao mali Hugo "I fix things", i to je neka satisfakcija. Kao sto je ovaj bezao svakim mogucim trenutkom da svira tako neko "bezi" svaki moguci trenutak da radi svoj posao koji voli, il bar da radi onaj deo posla koji voli. Svako ima drugaciji talenat a neciji moze samo da se prikaze radom u korporativnom okruzenju. Sustina je u tome da se ima vremena i za vanposlovne aktivnosti i tu se slazem. Jurnjava za parama je svakako najgore zlo.

[noskich]

Evo tog duznickog ropstva o kojem sve vreme pricam: http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/ekonomija/aktuelno.239.html:438708-Krediti-gradjane-guraju-u-ropstvoOva profesorka sa Filozofskog je lepo objasnila koren problema:Sistemski problem dužničkog ropstva u koji smo upali, kako kaže prof. dr Vera Vratuša Žunić, sa beogradskog Filozofskog fakulteta, počeo je još sedamdesetih, kad je višak petrodolara, posle „naftne krize“, završio na Zapadu. Banke su počele da vuku za rukav nerazvijene zemlje da uzmu dugoročne jeftine kredite za razvoj. Prvo su države, a potom i pojedinci, postali moderni robovi: Za razliku od dobro organizovane finansijske oligarhije, koja je akumulirala i ekonomsku, i političku, pa i vojnu moć, radništvo nema dovoljno organizovanu svest. Kod nas ja ne vidim spremnost da se preseče. Jedino moguće i ispravno rešenje jeste ono koje je primenio Island, koji je objavio da je cilj države da vodi računa o svojim građanima, a ne o finansijskoj oligarhiji!Bravo profesorka!Kako su razvijene zemlje postale razvijene, a nerazvijene postale nerazvijene?Tako sto razvijene kradu od nerazvijenih pa im posle pozajmljuju ta ista ukradena dobra uz kamatu.

Edited September 24, 2013 by noskich

[расејан]

Kako su razvijene zemlje postale razvijene, a nerazvijene postale nerazvijene?Tako sto razvijene kradu od nerazvijenih pa im posle pozajmljuju ta ista ukradena dobra uz kamatu.

А ако поставе себи неку власт која неће да узима те кредите, среде да им се промени власт. Видети списак земаља које немају централну банку: Андора, Монако и Ватикан, а до 2004 и Ирак. Притом се инсистира на независности тих банака, дефинисаној као независност од власти - не од ММФа, Светске банке и иних.

[noskich]

Objasnio covek `sranjizaciju` zaposlenja: http://www.strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/It’s as if someone were out there making up pointless jobs just for the sake of keeping us all working. And here, precisely, lies the mystery. In capitalism, this is precisely what is not supposed to happen. Sure, in the old inefficient socialist states like the Soviet Union, where employment was considered both a right and a sacred duty, the system made up as many jobs as they had to (this is why in Soviet department stores it took three clerks to sell a piece of meat). But, of course, this is the very sort of problem market competition is supposed to fix. According to economic theory, at least, the last thing a profit-seeking firm is going to do is shell out money to workers they don’t really need to employ. Still, somehow, it happens.While corporations may engage in ruthless downsizing, the layoffs and speed-ups invariably fall on that class of people who are actually making, moving, fixing and maintaining things; through some strange alchemy no one can quite explain, the number of salaried paper-pushers ultimately seems to expand, and more and more employees find themselves, not unlike Soviet workers actually, working 40 or even 50 hour weeks on paper, but effectively working 15 hours just as Keynes predicted, since the rest of their time is spent organising or attending motivational seminars, updating their facebook profiles or downloading TV box-sets.The answer clearly isn’t economic: it’s moral and political. The ruling class has figured out that a happy and productive population with free time on their hands is a mortal danger (think of what started to happen when this even began to be approximated in the ‘60s). And, on the other hand, the feeling that work is a moral value in itself, and that anyone not willing to submit themselves to some kind of intense work discipline for most of their waking hours deserves nothing, is extraordinarily convenient for them.Hell is a collection of individuals who are spending the bulk of their time working on a task they don’t like and are not especially good at. Say they were hired because they were excellent cabinet-makers, and then discover they are expected to spend a great deal of their time frying fish. Neither does the task really need to be done – at least, there’s only a very limited number of fish that need to be fried. Yet somehow, they all become so obsessed with resentment at the thought that some of their co-workers might be spending more time making cabinets, and not doing their fair share of the fish-frying responsibilities, that before long there’s endless piles of useless badly cooked fish piling up all over the workshop and it’s all that anyone really does.For instance: in our society, there seems a general rule that, the more obviously one’s work benefits other people, the less one is likely to be paid for it. Again, an objective measure is hard to find, but one easy way to get a sense is to ask: what would happen were this entire class of people to simply disappear? Say what you like about nurses, garbage collectors, or mechanics, it’s obvious that were they to vanish in a puff of smoke, the results would be immediate and catastrophic. A world without teachers or dock-workers would soon be in trouble, and even one without science fiction writers or ska musicians would clearly be a lesser place. It’s not entirely clear how humanity would suffer were all private equity CEOs, lobbyists, PR researchers, actuaries, telemarketers, bailiffs or legal consultants to similarly vanish. (Many suspect it might markedly improve.) Yet apart from a handful of well-touted exceptions (doctors), the rule holds surprisingly well.Real, productive workers are relentlessly squeezed and exploited. The remainder are divided between a terrorised stratum of the, universally reviled, unemployed and a larger stratum who are basically paid to do nothing, in positions designed to make them identify with the perspectives and sensibilities of the ruling class (managers, administrators, etc) – and particularly its financial avatars – but, at the same time, foster a simmering resentment against anyone whose work has clear and undeniable social value. Clearly, the system was never consciously designed. It emerged from almost a century of trial and error. But it is the only explanation for why, despite our technological capacities, we are not all working 3-4 hour days.

Edited September 25, 2013 by noskich

[noskich]

Evo cak i magazin za plutokrate Ekonomist skontao da ne valja `raditi` (tj. sedeti u kancelariji) previse: http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/09/working-hours?spc=scode&spv=xm&ah=9d7f7ab945510a56fa6d37c30b6f1709&fsrc=nlw%7Cnewe%7C9-30-2013%7C6709762%7C136679041%7CAPWorking less may make us more productive. And, as Russell argued, working less will guarantee “happiness and joy of life, instead of frayed nerves, weariness, and dyspepsia".E sad, zamisliti svet u kojem je prosecno radno vreme 15 sati nedeljno. Gde se ne ide shoping i restorane vec na piknik i kampovanje. Masovno.Gde svako ima vremena bilo koji dan da recimo odigra basket sa komsijama u kraju. Da poprica sa svima. Da ustane ujutru bez alarma.Ima jedna emisija ovde jako dobra o bastovanstvu, ali ne samo o tome, vec i uopste o do-it-yourself hobijima i zivotnom stilu: http://www.abc.net.au/gardening/Ne gledam TV, ali ovo je uzivanje gledati.

Edited October 2, 2013 by noskich

[noskich]

Sad videh sta je neko napisao u komentarima na ovaj tekst u Ekonomistu:The fact that Russell's and Keynes' optimistic predictions didn't come true, is due to a planned systematic undermining of social ideals by huge companies and their think tanks. Most of us would be satisfied with fewer material possessions and smaller bank accounts, if we would enjoy social security until death, happy family and community life, a more peaceful existence without stress and violence, pride in and connection to our cultural heritage, and closeness to nature. Many artificially created, destructive counter-developments, often cunningly masked by euphemistic or even positive sounding terms, have robbed us from everything that was dear to us. Cold digital technocracy is masked as 'innovation', international competition for local jobs called 'globalisation', loss of family and community life masked as 'emancipation', loss of cultural heritage called 'multi-culti', and destruction of nature and ancient ecological ways of production as 'efficiency'. This way the big multinational companies, helped by their apparent oppononents but de facto well-paid assistants, the 'intellectuals' who introduced 'PC' taboos, have systematically undermined the quality of our lives, for which we are 'compensated' with lots of superfluous material goods by way of consumerism masked as 'living standard'. But in order to get these goodies, we have to become slaves of the system. Without them, we can hardly survive anymore in this post-modern urban jungle. This way the companies make even more profit, on the expenses of all of us, the ecological balance of the planet, and the cultural heritage of the World's great nations, while we are not allowed to time to create, develop new ideas, and find alternative ways of living.

Edited October 2, 2013 by noskich

[noskich]

Nabasah na ovaj tekst o rasadu `kazino konzumerizma` iz Grcke jos 2011, nasa dijasporka pise utiske: http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Moj-zivot-u-inostranstvu/U-paucini-kazino-kapitalizma.sr.htmlЧињеница је да у Грчкој, у Србији као и свуда широм света постоји константно растући број једники и заједница чије финансије пуцају по свим шавовима, и испод којих нема ничег другог до голе коже непривилегованог члана друштва, чији је интелект отупљен бесмисленом забавом маса, тело омекшано удобностима модерног живота, а дух клонуо од недостатка повезаности са собом, са природом, и потраге за дубљим смислом.Ко сноси одговорност? Да ли су то моћници иза кулиса који секу и кроје светску економију и природне ресурсе према својим мерама и о чијим мотивима можемо само да нагађамо?Или су то политичари недостојни својих улога, који уместо да буду инспиративни лидери вођени чврстим принципима , осећајем правде и служењем народу који их је и изабрао, троше своје дане на политичке компромисе од којих нико нема користи, враћање услуга, чињење површних уступака зарад тренутне популарности, полирање свог имиџа и служе једино свом егу.Али, да ли су мање криви они који су добровољно подлегли масовној хипнози својевољно се уплевши у паучину материјализма, тако што су веровали шареној лажи, одрекавши се своје примарне људске способности размишљања и здравог расуђивања, и не питајући се куда све то води?

[Indy]