Svet

[No7]

Хихи, истина.Него сe јуче десила много значајнија ствар у Русији. После много неуспешних и некоплетних покушаја,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMlpwIboboE

[pacey defender]

According to news reports, Slovenian-based Ghanaian doctor and politician Peter Bossman was in the lead with over 30% of votes after yesterday's election to become mayor of the lovely seaside town of Piran. The race will now go into run-offs against the current sitting mayor who had just over 20% of the vote.

Edited October 11, 2010 by pacey defender

[Shan Jan]

wtf?! Svaka cast

[pacey defender]

Rođen je u Gani, ali kako piše u intervjuu koji je dao za Jutarnji list, 1979.godine je došao na studije u SFRJ.http://www.jutarnji.hr/zeli-promijeniti-piran--a-mijenja-sve-nas-balkance/887892/Bio je i odbornik u skupštini opštine, i predsednik mesne zajednice. ovo su mu predizborni spotovi:http://video.moglik.com/v/N2uLAzrMVlo/Peter-Bossman-o-ureditvi-smetišča.htmhttp://videos.wittysparks.com/id/4005288335da li je bilo sličnih primera u evropi? da imigrant postane gradonačelnik?

Edited October 11, 2010 by pacey defender

[Filipenko]

Aha, došao je u totalitarni SFRJ gde se nije poštovao ljudski život, baš čudno.

[Shan Jan]

Eh Tito i Jugoslavija. Zbog toga nas stara crnacka garda docekuje sa osmehom svuda u Africi. Mi im davali ucitelje, lekare i inzenjere a oni nama sve zive poslove. Znao je matori zanat :)

[Muwan]

Da li je stvarno ovo rekao ili su naši novinari kreativno tumačili?

Ministar spoljnih poslova Izraela Avigdor Liberman zatražio od EU da prestane da "daje lekcije" o mirovnom procesu na Bliskom istoku i da najpre reši probleme Evrope "na Kavkazu i na Kipru, i sukob Srbije i Kosova" a tek potom da deli savete Izraelu.

[onamonamo]

Ubec su fasisti na lokalu dobili 28% glasova...kad odbijemo nas auslendere, iz yu i turske, a i ostale, ispada da preko pola beca glasuje za fasiste

[Muwan]

To je zato što im država Austrija nije omogućila perspektivu.

[MancMellow]

To je zato što im država Austrija nije omogućila perspektivu.

[barrcode]

da , s tim što - koliko sam shvatio - srbi iz Beča su velikom većinom glasali za Strache-a tj. FPO, koji im se uveliko udvarao pre izbora.

[onamonamo]

hahahaha, kostunica je neobavesten, marko je nosio gajbice, a drzava nije omogucila perspektivu, hahaha

da , s tim što - koliko sam shvatio - srbi iz Beča su velikom većinom glasali za Strache-a tj. FPO, koji im se uveliko udvarao pre izbora.

bogte, sad sam tek vido, pa taj strahe ne priznaje laznu drzavu...e glupih srba ako ih je time pridobio

[MancMellow]

hahahaha, kostunica je neobavesten, marko je nosio gajbice, a drzava nije omogucila perspektivu, hahaha

Ma jok, nisam se ja smejao zbog toga, nego tome što se Beowl tako ironično i grubo podsmevao teškoj socijalnoj situaciji vođa navijača i njihovih siromašnih sledbenika iz najugroženijih senjačkih delova srpskog društva.

bogte, sad sam tek vido, pa taj strahe ne priznaje laznu drzavu...e glupih srba ako ih je time pridobio

+1 Edited October 14, 2010 by M16

[onamonamo]

izrazih bojazan da ce se drzavno omogucavanje perspektive po duhovitosti pribliziti prethodno nabrojanim posalicama.no, ima jos nesto, pre neki dan je u politici bila vest da srbi u austriji traze status manjine (ove godine su stekli pravo), a odma sledeci dan demanti od srpskih udruzenja iz beca... to mi bas bilo onako cudno...

[Filipenko]

Top Physics Professor Resigns From Post, Denouncing Global Warming "Fraud""[T]he global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it... has corrupted so many scientists" -- Harold LewisIn perhaps the biggest critique delivered against the current state of global warming research "consensus", since "climategate" at the University of East Anglia, a renowned physics professor has written a lengthy letter resigning from the American Physical Society and condemning the state of warming research.The letter was penned by Harold Lewis, an Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and is addressed to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society. Professor Lewis enjoyed a decorated career. A World War II veteran, entering the world of academia upon his return home, Professor Lewis wrote multiple books and made valuable contributions to the fields of missile defense and nuclear power. Recently, Professor Lewis took an interest to the topic of global warming research, as many of his physicist colleagues were becoming actively engaged in it.What he found was alarming to him and in his resignation letter, he voices outrage and what he feels is a financially-motivated fraud that is corrupting his fellow scientists. His following resignation letter was published, in its entirety, by the Academic Advisory Council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), which he became a member of late this year. The GWPF is a UK think tank that takes a critical stance on proposed global warming legislation.California meteorologist turned blogger Anthony Watts describes it as "a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door". Whether you agree or disagree with the current state of global warming research, it's hard to argue with that assertion. Here we have a prominent researcher in one of the primary fields of global warming research -- physics -- putting his reputation on the line to challenge what he feels is clear and present wrongdoing. Even if you believe that mankind is causing warming, the fact that vast sums of money are being poured into research to prove and examine mankind's supposed contribution to warming is certainly troublesome. After, all, as seen with politics and religion, the dollar is the almighty corrupter. While many researchers that would be loathe to publish biased materials and potentially fraudulent materials for a grant, there's likely many that wouldn't be.The APS is the world's second largest organization of physicists, behind the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.

Evo i šta je napisao čovek:

Professor Lewis writes:Dear Curt:When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.<5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition. APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.Hal

Iskreno rečeno, očekujem da ga Indy napuši zbog toga što se radi o samozvanom stručnjaku za sve koji dobija popularnost zbog interneta dostupnog svakom tupadžiji... <_<