Roger Sanchez Posted November 27, 2012 Author Posted November 27, 2012 Dobra se ovo dinamika na sitno zbiva u Ameriki - GOP mini clusterfuck nad Groverom Norquistom. Weasels! Ostavljaju ga prvi put kad je zbilja teško!
Sludge Factory Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 Beri ce ladno u shoubiznis kad mu prodje drugi mandathttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=k4Q3zKfBRnI
Gandalf Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Obamacare architect leaves White House for pharmaceutical industry jobThe pharmaceutical giant that just hired Fowler actively supported the passage of Obamacare through its membership in the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) lobby. Indeed, PhRMA was one of the most aggressive supporters - and most lavish beneficiaries - of the health care bill drafted by Fowler.
Skyhighatrist Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Beri ce ladno u shoubiznis kad mu prodje drugi mandatValabaš http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up_3vA2-9_c
hazard Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Razuman predlog za popravku preostalog Obaminog predsednikovanja. Bice zanimljivo videti da li ce se makar i jedna zamisao ostvariti, makar delimicno (sumnjam):.... (ne za predlog, nego za bilo ciju misao da ce se vise od pola ili jedne tacke sa liste ispuniti)
Roger Sanchez Posted December 17, 2012 Author Posted December 17, 2012 1 tranša GOP minority wooinga: Rep. Tim Scott will succeed Jim DeMint as South Carolina’s junior senator, two Republican sources confirmed, making him the the first African American Republican to serve in the U.S. Senate in more than three decades.Scott, 47, will become the first African American senator from the South since Reconstruction, as well as the only African American in the upper chamber. Illinois Democrat Roland Burris, who was appointed to replace Barack Obama in the Senate, last served in the chamber in November 2010.
Gandalf Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 (edited) da ima kladionica za ovo, kintu bih ulozio protiv Hagela.http://original.anti...tional-realist/ The knives are out:“Send us Hagel and we will make sure every American knows he is an anti-Semite.”That’s what a top Republican Senate aide told the Weekly Standard in response to the news that President Obama is likely to nominate former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel as his new Secretary of Defense. Normally, the Israel lobby would try to hide such viciousness, acting behind the scenes to go after their perceived enemies in ways that might repel bystanders: not this time, however. Edited December 17, 2012 by Gandalf
Roger Sanchez Posted December 17, 2012 Author Posted December 17, 2012 The Weekly Standard salutes the Republican senators who stood up against the prospect of U.N. ambassador Susan Rice as our next secretary of state. But let’s be clear: Chuck Hagel would do far more damage at Defense than Rice would have done at State. To have blocked Rice and then roll over for Hagel would be a disgrace. It would even give some credence to the thesis that Rice fell victim to a kind of sexism and certainly to old-boy-network-ism. So, if President Obama goes ahead and advances what we might call a Hagelian thesis, Republicans have an obligation to embrace their role as Obama’s antithesis, and to block him. :D
WTF Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 Da sam Barry, sad bi ozbiljno predlozio Condoleezzu, Boltona, ili Wolfovitza. Pa da s uzivanjem gledam kako ih GOP blokiraju. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roger Sanchez Posted January 1, 2013 Author Posted January 1, 2013 Barryjev politički plan ide ko po tračnicama - Senat bajpartizanski™ usvojio njegov plan, Cantor hvali Bidena kako je sve dobro obavljeno, ali House GOP će izgleda odlučiti biti krivo za rast poreza svima, ili se izrazito bolno raspasti po šavovima. Uglavnom, najluđi kokus ikada u povijesti US parlamentarizma neminovno će, s ove ili one strane - dobiti po gubici. Lajk. Barry, rokaj po luđacima.. rokaj.
Sirius Posted January 1, 2013 Posted January 1, 2013 Za razliku od ovoga gore smatram da je situacija u Vasingtonu katastrofalna na toliko mnogo nivoa.Ali, pre svega bih hteo da upitam nesrecnike iz nasih tzv. medija: odakle vam ideja da je sve zavrseno oko tzv. fiskalne provalije? Ne kazem da nece biti ali odakle vam ideja da ce Kongres kontrolisan od strane GOP lako provuci nesto sto nema velika ogranicenja u potrosnji? Evo, ja gledam vesti i postoje neke ovakve vesti: *LATOURETTE SAYS CANTOR WON'T SUPPORT BILL 'IN CURRENT FORM'Uzgred, Amerika je usla u fiskalnu provaliju. Cak i da Kongres provuce nekako dogovor, Amerika je formalno usla u fiskalnu provaliju prvog sekunda 1.1.2013. Sto je samo po sebi ponizavajuce.Juce sam imao nesrecu ili srecu da pratim uzivo desavanja u americkom Senatu a zatim i reakcije sa raznih strana. Za razliku od ovoga gore, koji govori kako Obama razvuljuje, ja sam imao drugaciji utisak slusajuci liberalne senatore DP, kao i reakcije liberalnih komentatora. Licno sam slusao kako neki od naliberalnih senatora napadaju Belu kucu zbog loseg dogovora. Isto su tvrdili i liberlani komentatori uz reci da je Obama ocajan poker igrac. Misleci na njegove lose pregovore sa GOP i popustanja, ne samo sada.Za razliku od ovoga gore koji ne zna, GOP se ranije podelio. Jos kod Plana B Boehnera se videla podela. Tada je GOP odbio predlog glavnog coveka GOP u Kongresu. Upravo je zato i doslo do ove situacije. Da je prosao Plan B verovatno bi pao i dogovor oko fiskalne provalije pre 1.1.2013.Drugi problem, slusao sam jednog senatora koji je objasnjavao da ovo nije samo ekonomski problem vec i problem demokratije. Ljudi u Srbiji ne znaju kako se u stvari doslo do nekakvog dogovora u Senatu. Bukvalno su se dva coveka zakljucala u sobi i pregovarala u poslednjim satima pred istek vremena za dogovor. Bez ikakvog znanja senatora, kongresmena i javnosti oko cega se vrti prica. Na sat vremena pred istek su samo isporucili nesto sto skoro niko nije procitao. Taj senator je poentirao: imali smo citavu godinu dana i nismo nista uspeli da dogovorimo a onda u poslednjim satima dva coveka nesto odlucuju. Mislio je da se tako radi u diktaturama ili poludiktaturama. Da ne govorim da je govorio kako Senat nije uspeo da odobri budzet SAD dve godine za redom iako je DP u vecini u Senatu a Obama je u Beloj kuci.Sa ekonomske strane, ovo je smesno i ustede su mnogo manje od planiranih. Ako uopste ovo prodje. A, uvek previse optimisticni CBO, kaze da ce ovo izazvati porast americkog duga za $4 triliona u narednih 10 godina. Sto znaci da ce verovatno biti preko $5 triliona.
Roger Sanchez Posted January 1, 2013 Author Posted January 1, 2013 Jbg, da bi sve išlo glatko i samo uz glumljene drame, prvo trebaju u Ameriki vaspostaviti jednu Russian style demokraciju™. ^_^
Recommended Posts