USA izbori 2024 - prognoze & play by play

[braca]

 

 

[Roger Sanchez]

20 hours ago, Mel said:

U Srbiji za Trampa u dlaku isto ljudi koliko i u Americi

Rekao bih da se čini da je puno popularniji, za jednu debelu dlaku

[braca]

Trump se više ni ne pretvara da nije u full fašističkom modu : 

 

 

[vememah]

 

5% misli da su oboje fašisti.

 

Dakle, oko 2/3 Amerikanaca misli da je bar jedan od dvoje predsedničkih kandidata fašista.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-fascist-concerns-poll/story?id=115083795

Edited Friday at 13:29 by vememah

[vememah]

 

 

 

[dunja]

Mali intrmeco za vesti iz sveta novinarstva, pošto danas na društvenim medijima trenduje zgražavanje en masse odlukom Washington Posta i LA Times da ne endorsuju nijednog od kandidata, u stilu:

 

Spoiler

 

Ono sto je zanimljivo je da su u slučaju oba lista novinari endorsovali Harrisovu, da bi to onda vlasnici novina blokirali, na šta su onda zaposleni javno reagovali (u slučaju WP, novinarski esnaf se zvanično oglasio izjavom, ne znam za LA Times). Enivej, šire u tekstu iz, well, WP:

 

Spoiler

The Washington Post says it will not endorse a candidate for president

 

Publisher William Lewis explained the decision as a return to the newspaper’s roots.

The Washington Post’s editorial board announced Friday that it will not make an endorsement in this year’s presidential contest, for the first time in 36 years, or in future presidential races.

The decision, 11 days before an election that most polls show as too close to call, marks the second time this week that a major media organization has declined to issue an endorsement in the race between the Republican nominee, former president Donald Trump, and his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, after years of making such endorsements. Earlier this week, Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times, blocked a planned endorsement of Harris, prompting the resignation of the newspaper’s editorials editor.

An endorsement of Harris had been drafted by Post editorial page staffers but had yet to be published, according to two sources briefed on the sequence of events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — according to the same sources.

“This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty. Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners),” former Post executive editor Martin Baron, who led the paper while Trump was president, said in a text message to The Post. “History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”

In a column published on The Post’s website Friday, Post Publisher William Lewis described the decision as a return to the newspaper’s roots of non-endorsement. The Post only began regularly endorsing presidential candidates in 1976, when the paper endorsed Jimmy Carter “for understandable reasons at the time.”

“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable,” Lewis wrote. “We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”

Lewis also portrayed the decision as a “statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds.”

The decision has roiled many on the editorial staff, which operates independently from The Post’s news staff, a long-standing tradition of American journalism designed to separate opinion writing from day-to-day news coverage.

The Los Angeles Times faced scrutiny and reader backlash over Soon-Shiong’s decision not to publish the planned endorsement of Harris. The biotech mogul said he wanted the editorial board to provide an analysis of each candidate’s policies to give readers “clear and nonpartisan information side-by-side.” The decision prompted the resignation of editorials editor Mariel Garza, who said the move made the paper look “craven and hypocritical.”

Soon-Shiong’s daughter, Nika Soon-Shiong, wrote on social media that the decision not to endorse a candidate has prompted “controversy and confusion” and implied that the decision had to do with the Biden-Harris administration’s policies on Israel and Gaza.

“This is not a vote for Donald Trump. This is a refusal to ENDORSE a candidate that is overseeing a war on children,” she wrote. “I trust the Editorial Board’s judgment. For me, genocide is the line in the sand.”

The Post had not always issued presidential election endorsements. In announcing The Post’s decision on Friday, Lewis cited an editorial The Post’s editorial board wrote in 1960 explaining its decision not to endorse a candidate in that year’s presidential race, after doing so in five of the six previous elections, the exception being an endorsement of Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952:

“In the light of hindsight we retain the view that the arguments for [Eisenhower’s] nomination and election were compelling. But hindsight also has convinced us that it might have been wiser for an independent newspaper in the Nation’s Capital to have avoided formal endorsement.”

Beginning in 1976, however, The Post began regularly endorsing candidates during each presidential election cycle, with the exception of 1988, when it declined to make a recommendation in the contest between George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis. In the 1976 race, The Post endorsed Democrat Jimmy Carter. All of its subsequent endorsements have been Democrats.

 

Meanwhile, komšijski Philadelphia Inquirer danas endorsovao Harrisovu jer, vele, "There has never been a more important presidential election in our lifetime. The road to the White House may well run through Pennsylvania and every vote matters."

 

Vredi znati i mali detalj da je vlasnik Iinquirera community nonprofit, Philadelphia Foundation.

 

Edited Friday at 18:59 by dunja

[Jimmy Kowalski]

 

[April]

Dok ne vidim da Tramp jebe pandu, nije se desilo. 

[Budja]

8 hours ago, copkillah said:

kamo lepe sreće da je tako

 

nego je taj klip malo secnut, postoji šansa i da je rekao nešto između

 

 

 

Cudi me da dosad nisi shvatio da Braca kaci, sto bi Yoyogi rekao, smece sa interneta.

 

 

[Čutura]

 

[Weenie Pooh]

6 hours ago, Čutura said:

 

 

Daj neke hajlajtse, ko će da sluša tri sata tog sranja da bi izvukao bisere.

 

Evo npr. rešenja za spas američke demokratije - prekvalifikovati Trampa da bude psihijatar, da leči kitove.

 

 

Edited Saturday at 09:39 by Weenie Pooh

[zorglub]

[Tutankamon]

Izašlo mi ovo na youtubu, ne znam koliko je korektno (mislim vrlo), jeste da čovek navija za Trampa ali ima pregršt informacija

https://www.youtube.com/@Election_Time/videos

[vememah]

 

Quote

Here’s a comparison of 2024 vs. 2020 vs. 2016:

• Today, the RealClearPolitics average of national polls shows Harris +0.9. Compare this to 2020, when on the same day, it was Biden +8.0 and in 2016, it was Clinton +5.9.

• So, Harris is not doing as good as Biden and Clinton. The tightness in the national polls is also reflected in key battlegrounds.

• Today, the RealClearPolitics average of battleground polls shows Trump +1.1. Compare this to 2020, when on the same day, it was Biden +4.0 and in 2016, it was Clinton +5.0.

https://tippinsights.com/tipp-tracking-poll-day-13-trump-and-harris-deadlocked-at-48/

[Weenie Pooh]