Mel Posted October 20 Posted October 20 3 minutes ago, Engineer said: Svisuisti, neću da glasam za manje zlo, mene politika ne zanima, bar je otvorio radna mesta, imamo prijatelje u celom svetu, i tri u federaciji Svega ovoga ne bilo da je američki narod bio dovoljno sposoban da 2016. izabere Bernija Sandersa. Nema selameta dok se ne iznadje neki nachin da se dedrzavizuju drzave i uklanjaju svi ti 'visi' efektivno vladajuci slojevi po celom svetu. Do tad svi napretci su krhki i skloni reverziji nekih tekovina koje smo imali posle WWII. Hocu reci da sam skepticna koliko bi i Berni tu mogao da pomogne.
theanswer Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Silverov poslednji update pokazuje prosek od samo 1,7% za Heris. Najniže što je bio odavno. Ovo je verovatno teritorija u kojoj Heris ne dobija EC. Ali je jako blizu. I opet kažem 1,7 može da bude i 2,7 i 0,7, čak i veća greška ne bi bila nerealna, a to je razlika od 300+ ECV za bilo koga od kandidata.
copkillah Posted October 20 Posted October 20 26 minutes ago, Engineer said: Svisuisti, neću da glasam za manje zlo, mene politika ne zanima, bar je otvorio radna mesta, imamo prijatelje u celom svetu, i tri u federaciji Svega ovoga ne bilo da je američki narod bio dovoljno sposoban da 2016. izabere Bernija Sandersa. a i da one koji glasaju za neku treću opciju ne proglašavaju bukvalno izdajnicima 1
Engineer Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Nisam to znao. Mada mislim da ljudi koji smatraju da možda neko treći može biti bolji kandidat nisu mnogo pogođeni tuđim mišljenjem. Ali u SAD je to svakako isto kao i neglasanje, pa nema ni mnogo smisla. 27 minutes ago, Mel said: Hocu reci da sam skepticna koliko bi i Berni tu mogao da pomogne. Ne znam, imao je drugačiji stav i spoljnoj i o domaćoj politici po većini pitanja od ostalih četvoro koje gledamo već skoro 10 godina u ovim trkama. Ako to ne znači ništa, onda ni izbori ne znače ništa 1
Anduril Posted October 20 Posted October 20 (edited) 1 hour ago, Moonwalker said: Degenerik kao i onaj u Kremlju. Koja je to Amerika za postovanje, rasizam, blatantna mizogonija, fejk hriscanstvo. «Prvak» radnicke klase. Mislis prodao bi Ukrajinu za slicnu uslugu? Kakav je on vojnik? Kurvar najobicniji. Na tome mu se cela predizborna kampanja svodi da je qc gazda, cak iako nema druga prava i iako ga oporezuju jos i vise. Tacno to - the elefant in the room je kako je moguce da takav covek ima blizu 50% podrske ma ko pobedio. Ovo je direktna posledica disfunkcionalnog politickog i informacionog sistema. Pre ili kasnije ce ovakvi izbori rezultirati katastrofom, a mutavi glasaci koji padaju na ovakve likove ce dobiti racun. Edited October 20 by Anduril 1
Tsai Posted October 20 Posted October 20 I dalje mislim da ce Kamala pobediti, neki unutrasnji osecaj. Dosta republikanaca ce glasati protiv Trampa
braca Posted October 20 Author Posted October 20 (edited) Koji paćenik… Kamala je rekla da je u mladosti radila za McDonalds, on zapeo da je slagala i evo rezultata : išao je da prži pomfrit da bi nešto dokazao Edited October 20 by braca 3
Moonwalker Posted October 20 Posted October 20 (edited) https://www.salon.com/2024/10/20/fighting-demons-the-new-apostolic-reformation-is-waging-a-holy-against-democracy/ Quote Unlike earlier incarnations of the Christian right, the explicit goal of the widely-discussed but little-understood NAR is to install theocracy with a democratic facade, approximately on the Iranian model. They call it “theonomy.” The movement is led by mutually recognized “apostles” and “prophets” who purport to receive direct guidance from God and see themselves engaged in spiritual warfare — literally, as in fighting actual demons — to gain dominion over the “seven mountains of culture”: family, religion, education, media, arts and entertainment, business and government. As in Iran, they wouldn’t just control government but every aspect of society, but would still call it democracy and claim, in the face of America’s "Godless Constitution," that this was what the founders wanted all along. It’s gaslighting in the name of God. Quote One result is NAR’s long time-horizon. “They think in a thousand years,” Ingersoll said. One home-school movement has developed a package for families to build “a 200-year plan for family dominion.” When she began writing about the push to roll back women’s right to vote about 15 years ago, “People would say, ‘That's crazy. That could never happen.’ I don't know that it can't happen, and among Christian nationalists there is a big discussion now about whether or not it's biblical for women to have the right to vote. If we don't think in the long term, we miss where they're going with all these things. “When we’re thinking in terms of the election or a current crisis or one particular leader, we are missing the long-term horizon with which these these efforts are made,” she continued. One way to shift focus, Ingersoll argues, is to track the use of terms that circulate in NAR circles, many of which (thanks to her) appeared in the glossary Salon published in May. These include “dominion,” ”biblical worldview,” “patriarchy” (as a positive), “government schools” instead of public schools, “civil government” instead of just government, “lesser magistrates,” “biblical spheres of authority” and “covenant marriage.” Spoiler NAR leaders "like to preserve a level of deniability. They want to be able to make outrageous claims in some contexts, but not be held accountable for them in other contexts." Edited October 20 by Moonwalker
3opge Posted October 20 Posted October 20 2 hours ago, copkillah said: a i da one koji glasaju za neku treću opciju ne proglašavaju bukvalno izdajnicima Niko ih ne proglasava izdajnicima, jednostavno su neprimetni i irelevantni
theanswer Posted October 20 Posted October 20 (edited) 2 hours ago, 3opge said: Niko ih ne proglasava izdajnicima, jednostavno su neprimetni i irelevantni A što volim kad se ovako pravite pametni a pojma nemate šta pričate Znači ovo čak nije ni super pac ad, nego Harris campaign ad. Edited October 20 by theanswer 2
3opge Posted October 20 Posted October 20 12 minutes ago, theanswer said: A što volim kad se ovako pravite pametni a pojma nemate šta pričate Znači ovo čak nije ni super pac ad, nego Harris campaign ad. aj obidji me s tvojim expertskim uvidima, gde si ti ovde cuo izraz izdajnik?
dragance Posted October 21 Posted October 21 7 hours ago, Tutankamon said: Tramp je vojnik (zavrsio je srednju vojnu skolu u Njujorku i on zna da kao vojnik mora biti a) nepredvidiv i b) imati inicijativu a to upravo sta od njega ocekujem u spoljnoj politici jer mu unutrasnju nece dati mnogo da dira (pojesce ga lobiji). Tramp je u pravu da Putin nikad ne bi ni napao Ukrajinu da je on bio na vlasti jer je ovaj nepredvidiv...sa demokratama cemo da dobijemo uobicajenu demokratsku spoljnu politiku (Obama-Bajden) gde je Amerika vreca za napucavanje koju ne postuje vise niko, gde ce da se desi da ih prestizu dogadjaji a ovi samo slezu ramenima i ne rade nista... Kakav vojnik, takva i “vojna akademija” John Gotti, FF Coppola…
Recommended Posts