USA izbori 2024 - prognoze & play by play

[copkillah]

1 minute ago, braca said:

Mene baš zanima zašto je Kamala djubre 

 

Zato što, šta god pričala, na praktičnom nivou podržava i omogućava genocid nad Palestincima.

 

Zato što se doji AIPAC novcem, u vezi sa ovim prvim.

 

Podržavala je Trampa prilikom eskalacije rata u Siriji, glasala je da se poveća vojni budžet.

 

Podržala je zakon koji primorava škole da prijavljuje učenike bez dokumenata imigracionoj službi, koja ih je zatim razdvajala od roditelja.

 

Godinama je držala mahom mlade crnce u zatvorima zbog vutre (koji nisu imali istoriju nasilja), koji su tako bili jeftina radna snaga za njene drugare iz korporacija.

 

Štitila je serijske silovatelje iz Katoličke crkve, odbijajući da pokrene procese protiv njih

 

Više puta je glasala za zabranu federalnog finansiranja abortusa.

 

Dovoljno ili?

 

 

 

[copkillah]

4 minutes ago, Vasilij Zajcev said:

Nisu se pomešala, quote-ovo sam ti oba, samo sam ih povezao u kontext. Juče si objašnjavao braci da su ga navukli, te da ovaj degenerik nije radio ovo što je ceo svet video da je radio, a danas iskačeš sa svisuistizmom. Ja ti samo držim ogledalo.

 

A što se tiče Kamale, evo najiskrenije, ja ne znam da li ljudsko smeće. I generalno ne dajem sebi za pravo da postavljam takve kvalifikacije ljudima koje ne poznajem.. Mislim da je neharizmatična, praznjikava, loš govornik... I sve takva, kakva je, 1000x pristojnija opcija od ovog orangutana s kojim pokušavaš da je izjednačiš. 

 

4 minutes ago, theanswer said:

 

Svi političari koji dođu do tog nivoa su đubrad. Nema šanse da se provuče neki normalan. 

 

Evo ti theanswerovo objašnjenje tog svisuistizma, koliko pristojnih ljudskih bića na tom nivou politike možeš da nabrojiš? Pazi, letvica za to je nisko postavljena: npr da nema više od tri stvari zbog koje bismo čak i nas dvojica lako mogli da se složimo da je ljudsko smeće.

 

Imaš u mom prethodnom postu solidan spisak zbog čega je ona đubre, a ima toga još. Nema seksualnih prestupa kao Tramp (što je nekako jedna od prvih asocijacija na njega, lik bukvalno IZGLEDA kao seksualni prestupnik, čak i da ne znamo sve o njemu), mada je pitanje koliko joj je to problematično, s obzirom da je štitila takve, pa i daleko gore od njega.

 

[Roger Sanchez]

19 minutes ago, copkillah said:

Više puta je glasala za zabranu federalnog finansiranja abortusa.

Ovo sam znao što kenjaš i podmećeš čim sam vidio. Ono, iz čista mira je glasala za tu zabranu, a zato jer je đubre?

Quote

 

He pointed out that Harris and others onstage have also voted in favor of the Hyde Amendment, which is often included in congressional spending bills that Democrats also support.

House Progressive Caucus co-chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal has broken down this tension well: One of the main reasons Democrats continue voting for Hyde in Congress is because Republicans would refuse to approve spending bills if it were taken out, increasing the potential of a government shutdown.

 

Evo još jedno đubre

Quote

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday defended his past votes for legislation containing a provision prohibiting federal funding for most abortions, while reiterating his support for abortion rights.

Sanders was asked on CNN’s “State of the Union” about his support for bills containing the Hyde Amendment, which bans using Medicaid funds for abortions unless the woman’s life is in danger or the pregnancy arises from rape or incest.

“Well, look, sometimes in a large bill you have to vote for things you don’t like,” Sanders said. “But I think my record as being literally 100 percent ‘pro-choice’ is absolutely correct.”

Prdi ti nekom drugom s tim argumentima™

Edited November 3 by Roger Sanchez

[Vasilij Zajcev]

Ma lik je bukvalno sve sa čim se ja fundamentalno ne slažem. Bogati beli naslednik koji je karijeru napravio bahateći se i unesrećujući druge. Taj odnos prema ženama je samo jedna od 100 nijansi njegovog primitivizma.

[copkillah]

9 minutes ago, Roger Sanchez said:

Ovo sam znao što kenjaš i podmećeš čim sam vidio. Ono, iz čista mira je glasala za tu zabranu, a zato jer je đubre?

Evo još jedno đubre

Prdi ti nekom drugom s tim argumentima™

 

I sve ostalo sam podmetnuo, je li? Evo živ nisam da objasniš šta sam podmetnuo u tome što je branila silovatelje iz Katoličke crkve.

 

7 minutes ago, Vasilij Zajcev said:

Ma lik je bukvalno sve sa čim se ja fundamentalno ne slažem. Bogati beli naslednik koji je karijeru napravio bahateći se i unesrećujući druge. Taj odnos prema ženama je samo jedna od 100 nijansi njegovog primitivizma.

 

Ali ti i dalje želiš da dokažeš ono što niko ne dovodi u pitanje, da je u pitanju najobičniji nakot za koga niko normalan iz ubeđenja ne bi mogao da glasa.

 

Samo što se radi o tome da moraš da budeš glup ko kurac i da budeš fan druge strane. Pazi koju sam reč upotrebio, FAN, da ne bude posle opet zabune. Ja razumem one koji će da zapuše nos i da operu ruke posle glasanja za nju, jer im je ova druga strana gadniija, ali eno ti poduži spisak bukvalno zlodela, pa mi reci šta je od navedenog okej za tebe.

[Roger Sanchez]

38 minutes ago, copkillah said:

Štitila je serijske silovatelje iz Katoličke crkve, odbijajući da pokrene procese protiv njih

Quote

Before Harris was elected district attorney in 2003, a U.S. Supreme Court decision made it impossible to pursue criminal prosecutions of child sexual abuse cases after statutes of limitation had expired.

2/2, dalje neću trošiti vrijeme na tvoje manipulativno kenjanje

[duma]

2 hours ago, 3opge said:

 

ali si itekako zivahan da zaseravas ovaj topik budalasanjem i cackanjem nekih koji imaju nesto da kazu.

 

Misliš na one koji su nas ubeđivali da jedino Bajden može da dobije Trampa? Na one koji su proglašavali Trampoidima one koji su protiv Bajdena?

Bajden je bio jedan od retkih koji nisu mogli da pobede Trampa.

Ili na one koji su nas ubeđivali da je Bajden bolji od Haris? 

Ako pobedi Tramp moći ćemo da kažemo da ima luđih i od nas. Neko na slobodnim izborima izabere mentalno nestabilnu osobu za predsednika? 

Tramp je bolja opcija za par diktatora, uključujući i našeg.  Pored toga i za Zelenskog. Teže će on pustiti Ukrajinu niz vodu.

 

Edited November 3 by duma

[Mr.Mxyzptlk]

zna li se kada se mogu ocekivati neki nprvi rezultati u sredu po nasem vremenu?

[theanswer]

4 hours ago, Mr.Mxyzptlk said:

zna li se kada se mogu ocekivati neki nprvi rezultati u sredu po nasem vremenu?

 

 

[dragance]

4 hours ago, Mr.Mxyzptlk said:

zna li se kada se mogu ocekivati neki nprvi rezultati u sredu po nasem vremenu?

Ništa do 6. januara dušo.

[vememah]

Spomenuto gostovanje:

 

 

Edited November 4 by vememah

[Ayatollah]

6 hours ago, Mr.Mxyzptlk said:

zna li se kada se mogu ocekivati neki nprvi rezultati u sredu po nasem vremenu?

 

Toplo ti savetujem da odeš na spavanje i vidiš rezultate ujutro, osim ako nisi noćna ptica koja voli da noćobdija i nema nikakve obaveze u sredu. Ja sam dva prethodna izbora sedeo do pola noći, i pre 3 ujutro nemaš iole bitnije informacije.

[Gojko & Stojko]

 

How Trump "Won"—A Warning

 

[Nov 3, 2024: Atlanta, GA] No, I don’t have a crystal ball. But I do have 25 years’ experience investigating voting trickery. And what I see here in Georgia is ugly. What I’ve seen in Arizona, Texas, Michigan and Wisconsin is uglier.

 

So, I’m warning right now: unless action is taken, and now, by the US Department of Justice to protect the vote, I don’t see how Vice-President Kamala Harris can win.

Why? Join me in going back to the future.

 

The day is November 6: This coming Wednesday. A group of MAGA fanatics called True the Vote has, according to an NAACP estimate, challenged the ballots of over 300,000 Georgians—not surprisingly, mostly voters of color. (We’re not guessing: the Palast Investigations Team contacted 800 of these Georgians.)

 

Trump has been promoting, and raising millions for, True the Vote, which announced its aim of challenging 2 MILLION through Election Day. What’s particularly dangerous is that True the Vote’s 40,000 vigilante volunteers will be blocking the count of ballots on Election Day itself and the days after. Hundreds of thousands of voters who mail in their ballots have no idea their votes are about to be thrown into the electoral dumpster.

 

On November 8: I expect Georgia’s MAGA-controlled county elections boards to remove one in five of those challenged. In 2020, Trump asked Georgia officials to “find” 11,780 votes. Now they will “find” 60,000 voters to remove—enough for Trump to “win” the State of Georgia.

 

November 9: The NAACP files suit to overturn the vigilante challenges because they were submitted too close to an election (and after).  But the Supreme Court’s shock ruling last week allowing new purges of voter rolls in Virginia effectively nullifies the National Voter Registration Act which was supposed to block these last-minute sneak attacks on voter rolls.   

 

November 12: Arizona disqualifies 30,000 “provisional” ballots, overwhelmingly cast in Hispanic precincts, tipping the race to Trump. (According to the federal Elections Assistance Commission, a breathtaking 2.7 million provisional ballots were rejected in 2020.  Who gets shunted to these provisional “placebo” ballots? If you’re Black, Asian-American or Hispanic, the chance you’ll be shunted to a “provisional” ballot is 300% higher than if you’re a white voter.)

 

December 11: This is the final day under the Constitution –– and new law written by GOP Senate majority leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) –– for each state governor to submit the names of the winning Electors. Get ready for this to happen: Michigan again disqualifies tens of thousands of ballots. (Note: Michigan disqualified 75,000 ballots in Detroit in 2016 as “spoiled,” i.e. unreadable, because scanners simply broke down.) Another “Brooks Brothers riot” organized, as in 2000, by Roger Stone, now a chieftain of the Proud Boy, creates mayhem in the Wayne County (Detroit) elections office. That stops the count in Michigan. As a result, Michigan can’t submit its slate of electors by the absolute “certification” deadline of December 11, and the state, though won by Harris, loses all its Electoral votes.

 

December 17: In Nevada’s capital, Carson City, there is mayhem surrounding the State House. The Three-Percenters pick up the war cry, “Give us Trump or we light this whole sh*t on fire.”  (We filmed Trump crony Ali Alexander, with Alex Jones, saying exactly those words in front of Georgia’s Governor’s Mansion after the last election.

 

In my admittedly dark nightmare, the Molotov cocktails fly and the AR-15s slaughter dozens of pro-democracy demonstrators. The well-planned riots in Nevada and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, are not unexpected. Derek Molenhour, a booster of the openly-armed Three Percenters’ militias, told me, they have long prepared to launch what he calls their “revolution,” justified because Harris, they are certain, could only win by stealing the election.

 

We can easily imagine that the chaos and flames of insurrection could prevent Nevada’s and Pennsylvania’s newly elected members of the Electoral College, from meeting to officially cast their ballots by the December 17 deadline.

 

Trump would be thrilled. With no candidate receiving 270 Electoral votes, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson will declare that the race will now be decided by the rules of the 12th Amendment. The 12th Amendment dictates that the House of Representatives will choose our President—and dig this—each state gets one single vote. California and New York will each get a vote. South and North Dakota each get a vote chosen by their Congressional delegations.

 

With 26 Congressional delegations controlled by Republicans, though a tiny minority of the US population, Trump would be voted back in as President.

 

On January 20, Americans stunned by this pseudo-legal coup d’état march on Washington. Newly inaugurated President Trump orders troops to round up, even shoot, those complaining about the theft of our democracy.

 

We are charged with “sedition.”

 

By January 21, I could be writing my column in an orange suit.

 

And I’ll have to tell my cell-mates, “I told you so.”

 

SaE

[braca]

I onda se MAGA čudi kad neko kaže da su djubrad :

 

Ceo niz je za povaraćanje 

[braca]