Jump to content
IGNORED

Premier League 2024-25 — Memorijalni ArleKino Topić


Weenie Pooh
Valk
Message added by Valk,

Topik Premier lige je posvećen našem dragom ArleKinu, koji više nije sa nama.

Nadamo se da se u džennetu čuje grmljavina topova sa Emirata, dok ti pikaš lopte na Hajberiju.

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Pokojni Ruxin said:

 

cenim entuzijazam, ali laž ponovljena hiljadu puta neće postati istina sve dok sam ja ovde :fantom:
navedi koje tehnikalije?


Ne znam zašto uporno troluješ, kada “navijaš” za drugi klub svako malo, ali:

IMG_1684.thumb.jpeg.64ceca54af823847dcb8ef1eb3bb9fe9.jpeg

Posted (edited)

were not proven or were time-bared

 

hvala, to je to. u prevodu CAS nije našao nikakve prekršaje u svemu što je gledao, ali ćemo da se pravimo da znamo da definitivno prekršaji tamo gde nije uopšte ni gledao. kako je to tačno tehnikalija molim te?

Edited by Pokojni Ruxin
  • Haha 1
Posted

Jebucka te ono “ili”, a i dalje su kaznjeni sa €10m

Posted

čekaj, piše ILI optužba nije dokazana ILI je optužba time-bared. i ti misliš da to znači da su gledali i to što su znali otpočetka da im nije u nadležnosti, samo da bi valjda zaključili "ok jesu prekršili ali jbg ne možemo ništa"? lmao :kecman:

 

siti je kažnjen isključivo zbog toga što nije sarađivao sa uefom, kao što sam već naveo milion puta

  • Haha 1
Posted

Koji si ti smor, što sam te skidao sa IL :isuse:

 

As the charges with respect to any dishonest
concealment of equity funding were clearly more significant violations than obstructing the CFCB’s
investigations, it was not appropriate to impose a ban on participating in UEFA’s club competitions
for MCFC’s failure to cooperate with the CFCB’s investigations alone.

However, considering i) the financial resources of MCFC; ii) the importance of the cooperation of
clubs in investigations conducted by the CFCB, because of its limited investigative means; and iii)
MCFC’s disregard of such principle and its obstruction of the investigations, the CAS Panel found that
a significant fine should be imposed on MCFC and considered it appropriate to reduce UEFA’s initial
fine by 2/3, i.e. to the amount of EUR 10 million.

Posted

jebucka te reading comprehension 

Posted

Eno ti gore odlomak sa CAS sajta, pa napiši šta je oslobadjajuće.

Posted

bolje da se prebacimo na tumačenja narodskim jezikom, ne bih da osvanem ovde. evo sky prevod presude:

 

The majority of the panel found that UEFA's allegation that sponsorship income had been inflated was not proven.


Payments from Etisalat were time-barred according to UEFA's own rules, and Etihad Airways' payments were partially time-barred. Meanwhile, the CAS panel was not satisfied that UEFA had properly established their case.

 

The CAS panel said City were guilty of a severe rule breach for not co-operating with the investigation and should be seriously reproached. The panel therefore found it appropriate to fine City €10m (£8.96m).

 

izvor

 

ne treba izvinjenje, zbunjen si razumem

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Pokojni Ruxin said:

bolje da se prebacimo na tumačenja narodskim jezikom, ne bih da osvanem ovde. evo sky prevod presude:

 

The majority of the panel found that UEFA's allegation that sponsorship income had been inflated was not proven.


Payments from Etisalat were time-barred according to UEFA's own rules, and Etihad Airways' payments were partially time-barred. Meanwhile, the CAS panel was not satisfied that UEFA had properly established their case.

 

The CAS panel said City were guilty of a severe rule breach for not co-operating with the investigation and should be seriously reproached. The panel therefore found it appropriate to fine City €10m (£8.96m).

 

izvor

 

ne treba izvinjenje, zbunjen si razumem

Ja sam ti citirao CAS directly. A i u tvom Sky Sportu ti takodje kažu da je glavni problem/optužba zastarela. No, svakako će sve doći na pravo mesto oko Februara, a tu nema zastarevanja kod EPL. Tako da - strpimo se obojica. 

Edited by dragance
Posted (edited)

piše isto i tamo, samo nemam volje da crtam. glavni problem za uefin tanak slučaj možda, ali apsolutno nigde ne piše da postoje dokazani prekršaji samo jbg te tehnikalije...

Edited by Pokojni Ruxin
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Recite mi da ce izbaciti Shity da umru u mukama??

 

Molim vas recite da je to

 

I liverpul :D

Edited by kipo
Posted
8 hours ago, kipo said:

Recite mi da ce izbaciti Shity da umru u mukama??

 

Molim vas recite da je to

 

I liverpul :D


Oni su ćao čim ode Salahudin, a kao što vidiš gore to je sve izvesnije na kraju ove sezone. 

Posted
1 hour ago, John Coltrane said:


Oni su ćao čim ode Salahudin, a kao što vidiš gore to je sve izvesnije na kraju ove sezone. 

Ma nemrem vjerovati u to. Salah je pola Liverpula poslednjih koliko, upisuje gol i/ili asistenciju kad ima los dan. Ni godine mu nista ne mogu, zilav je, posti redovno, bice zvrk do 35-te ladno. Sve u svemu, ikona i ponajbitniji igrac Liverpula.

  • +1 3
  • Hvala 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...