January 18, 20223 yr Author 4 minutes ago, dùda said: ima li neka dobra duša da ovde ostavi preprič za nas sa jeftinijim kartama ? covek ispricao gore/dole sve sto su pricali team novak ljudi na forumu + forumasi iz australije tiliju zamera sto nije seo viktoriju i federaciju i jasno izasao pred tenisere nije iskljucio kao razumnu meru karantin (kao sto kina sada radi sa velikim takmicenjem) ocekuje da ako kovid popusti 3-godisnji ban ne bi trebao da bude problem brine za novaka ako ove godine svi grand slem turniri budu sledili ao
January 19, 20223 yr Just now, Lancia said: Kako ti to znas? Krenula je sa sportistima još kao klinka, bila je u vezi sa jednim našim teniserom iz Novakove generacije pa je (pametno) procenila da je Novak daleko veći potencijal i ubola je džekpot.
January 20, 20223 yr mislim da je ovde pravo mesto za ovo https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2022/2022fcafc0003 samo bih molila nekog ko dobro zna engleski a i razume se u pravo, da da ovde u kratkim crticam šta je najbitnije hvala unapred p.s. meni je ovo baš kompliovano za čitanje
January 20, 20223 yr Author 1 hour ago, dùda said: mislim da je ovde pravo mesto za ovo https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2022/2022fcafc0003 samo bih molila nekog ko dobro zna engleski a i razume se u pravo, da da ovde u kratkim crticam šta je najbitnije hvala unapred p.s. meni je ovo baš kompliovano za čitanje ovo dole ... kao sto smo i rekli ministar ima pravo, naveli i po kom clanu zakona. dao je razloge zbog kojih ima pravo nakon promisljanja (samo njemu znanog misaonog procesa) spomenuli da mozda neki drugi ministar mozda ne bi doneo takvu odluku (nisu rekli da bi taj mogao biti okarakterisan kao onaj koji vredi 5 elektora) pozvali se na neku raniju presudu (Gummow J said in Eshetu 197 CLR at 654 [137]) koja kaze da je tesko utvrditi utvrditi kriterijum koji ce reci da je neko promisljanje razumnih umova nerazumno (i.e. ministar hawke je razuman ) tj. da raumni umovi mogu doci do razlicitih zakljucaka i zato je tesko utvrditi da je odluka nerazumna Spoiler FURTHER MATTERS 103 Considerable debate took place as to how to approach the Minister’s statement of reasons in this case. We do not consider that the resolution of that debate is necessary to reach the views we have. The Minister was not obliged to give reasons, but he did so. They were evidently carefully drafted. The Court has no doubt that in respect of a matter of high public profile, care and consideration was given to the formulation of the reasons in the four days in which the Minister took to consider the matter and finalise and deliver the reasons. Nevertheless, some weight is to be given to the fact that there was no obligation to give the reasons. Further, the stricture that the reasons should not be parsed and analysed with a fine tooth comb with an eye to identification of error is always to be followed. There was a clear interrelationship among all parts of the Minister’s reasons. The themes of encouragement and emulation of a sporting hero and icon run through the reasons for satisfaction as to health and good order and the public interest. 104 Parliament has made clear in s 116 that the Minister may cancel a visa if he or she is satisfied that presence of its holder in Australia may be a risk to the health or good order of the Australian community. The Minister reached that state of satisfaction on grounds that cannot be said to be irrational or illogical or not based on relevant material. Whether or not others would have formed that state of satisfaction and the state of satisfaction as to the public interest is a consideration not to the point. The relevant states of satisfaction were of matters which involved questions of fact, projections of the future and evaluations in the nature of opinion. As Gummow J said in Eshetu 197 CLR at 654 [137]: “where the criterion of which the authority is required to be satisfied turns upon factual matters upon which reasonable minds could reasonably differ, it will be very difficult to show that no reasonable decision-maker could have arrived at the decision in question”. 105 That is the position in this case. Another person in the position of the Minister may have not cancelled Mr Djokovic’s visa. The Minister did. The complaints made in the proceeding do not found a conclusion that the satisfaction of the relevant factors and the exercise of discretion were reached and made unlawfully. 106 As the Court said at the conclusion of argument on Sunday, the Court was and is grateful to all counsel and solicitors for the comprehensive, erudite and clear submissions prepared under very tight time constraints, and for the economy and despatch of the oral argument. Such contributed significantly to the ability of the Court to deal with the matter in a timely way. I certify that the preceding one hundred and six (106) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Chief Justice Allsop, Justices Besanko and O'Callaghan.
October 28, 20222 yr 4 hours ago, April said: Ja mislim da bi ipak trebao da se vakciniše Mislim da bi pre u sebe ubrizgao arsen nego vakcinu.
October 31, 20222 yr 27 minutes ago, eumeswil said: Jel dolazi Najdžel kod Srkija opet? Misliš da je Srkiju potrebna buster doza Najdžela?
October 31, 20222 yr realno, posle one epizode iz januara, srki se povukao u kucu na planini. ne pusta ni glasa.
November 1, 20222 yr On 31.10.2022. at 14:35, Ras said: Misliš da je Srkiju potrebna buster doza Najdžela? Jok, već da je Najdželu potrebna buster doza albanske koke sa Haninih sisa.
November 1, 20222 yr Domaći film, 4 reči... Spoiler Hana i njene sise Edited November 1, 20222 yr by Ras
Create an account or sign in to comment