Bajden - jedno staro i očekivano presidency?

[dragance]

2 hours ago, Weenie Pooh said:

 

Ima li neku definisanu jurisdikciju taj sud? Ono kao, nadležan je za sve zločine počinjene na planeti Zemlji, u Sunčevom sistemu, u našem kraku Mlečnog puta, nešto?

Taj iskasapljeni Saudijac je imao prijavljeno boravište, radio i imao azil u SAD, kao i njegova verenica. Zato je sud nadležan. 

Edited December 8, 2022 by dragance

[Peter Fan]

13 minutes ago, x500 said:

Izvinjavam se za off-topic. 

 

@zorglub procenti koje pominjes mogu da budu vezan za savezni budzet rahmetli SFRJ. Vecina stvari se finansirala iz republickih budzeta. Tek par stvari je islo iz saveznog: vojska, diplomatija, par saveznih ogoljenih institucija i fond za razvoj. 

 

Doduse, deo para za vojsku u sirem smislu su finansirale republike kroz TO i firme kroz tzv radnicke bataljone (kao deo TO).

 

Nego, kad vec pricamo o dugovima i o Dzou, otkud SAD tako veliki dug?! Oko 700 milijardi godisnje se trosi za servisiranje duga. Meni to deluje kao puno para i pritom dug jos uvek raste.

 

Ovo, plus su poslije 1974. republike imale mogucnost zaduzivanja napolju mimo federacije. Tada je najvise i uzela maha republicka autarhija, pa je bukvalno svako selo imalo svoju pivaru, seceranu, itd. To je bilo strasno neefikasno , sve i da ne u to ne uracunamo poslovicnu neefikasnost vecine drustvenih poduzeca.

 

Nego, opet trolujete temu rezerivsanu za mog precednika:

 

 

[Amos]

Diskusija o levici iz prethodnih nekoliko dana prebačena topik koji čami usamljen mesecima: 

 

 

[eumeswil]

STO donela odluku kontra američkih trgovinskih mera u vezi čelika i aluminijuma. Ovi im u skladu sa filozofijom rules based international ordera odgovaraju da se nose u kurac, neće oni njima govoriti šta će da rade.

 

 

[Weenie Pooh]

Ništa lepše nego kontinuitet vladavine u stabilokratiji, zašto bi se politika menjala kad jednu stranku zameni druga - drastično & fundamentalno drugačija! - kad su u pitanju vitalni nacionalni interesi?

 

(Jer drugim zemljama, naravno, uopšte nije u interesu da zaštite svoju industriju metala, to je samo Amerikancima stvarno bitno.)

 

Dakle Trump tarife lepo uveo 2018, a dvaes' druge, dvaes' druge, Biden nastaviiio...

[eumeswil]

Bogotac.

 

 

[askeladden]

Zasto da se suzdrzava od pisanja po narodu?

[Lezilebovich]

Niko da pomene da i Bajden uzima suvenire™ u vidu klasifikovanih dokumenata. 
 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64244007

Edited January 12, 2023 by Lezilebovich

[3opge]

evo nove zlobabe na pomolu

 

 

 

 

[Zverilla]

On 8.12.2022. at 20:53, dragance said:

Taj iskasapljeni Saudijac je imao prijavljeno boravište, radio i imao azil u SAD, kao i njegova verenica. Zato je sud nadležan. 

Otkad se za nadležnos suda gleda gde oštećena strana živi?

Kolko me sećanje služi, nadležnost ide po tome gde se desio zločin. Npr  zato je za ubistvo Tatona bio nadležan srpski a ne francuski sud. 

[Lezilebovich]

26 minutes ago, 3opge said:

evo nove zlobabe na pomolu

 

 

 

 

 

kažu™ da je ipak malo manje zadrta od ostatka stranke, pre svega oko klime (ako sam dobro razumeo). detalj pre nego što se kandidovala 

 

 

[Meazza]

Sta sam vam rekao? Pa LOL.

 

Chinese spy balloon may have been blown off intended course – report

 

US officials who tracked balloon from launch on Hainan island reportedly examining possibility that unusual weather took it over North America

 

US authorities “haven’t seen any indication or anything that points specifically to the idea that these three objects were part of [China’s] spy balloon program or that they were definitely involved in external intelligence,” national security council spokesperson John Kirby said.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/15/japan-says-aerial-objects-spotted-in-recent-years-were-likely-chinese-spy-balloons

 

 

Edited February 20, 2023 by Meazza

[bags]

On 1. 2. 2023. at 23:13, 3opge said:

evo nove zlobabe na pomolu

 

 

 

 

 

Koliko zla izlazi iz ove dve zene...

[Peter Fan]

Dje je i sta radi Sleepy Joe:

 

WASHINGTON — Finally, there is a peace deal of sorts in the Middle East. Not between Israel and the Arabs, but between Saudi Arabia and Iran, which have been at each other’s throats for decades. And brokered not by the United States but by China.

This is among the topsiest and turviest of developments anyone could have imagined, a shift that left heads spinning in capitals around the globe. Alliances and rivalries that have governed diplomacy for generations have, for the moment at least, been upended.

The Americans, who have been the central actors in the Middle East for the past three-quarters of a century, almost always the ones in the room where it happened, now find themselves on the sidelines during a moment of significant change. The Chinese, who for years played only a secondary role in the region, have suddenly transformed themselves into the new power player. And the Israelis, who have been courting the Saudis against their mutual adversaries in Tehran, now wonder where it leaves them.

“There is no way around it — this is a big deal,” said Amy Hawthorne, deputy director for research at the Project on Middle East Democracy, a nonprofit group in Washington. “Yes, the United States could not have brokered such a deal right now with Iran specifically, since we have no relations. But in a larger sense, China’s prestigious accomplishment vaults it into a new league diplomatically and outshines anything the U.S. has been able to achieve in the region since Biden came to office.”

 

[Peter Fan]

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/11/us/politics/saudi-arabia-iran-china-biden.html